If you was a MP would you be in trouble?
#1
If you was a MP would you be in trouble?
I'm sure we've put company expenses down that are stupid little things but I can’t ever see myself put OTT claims in.
The girls in accounts used to tell me all sorts of stories about Sales Reps claims.
If I was a MP which would mean I was a corrupt lying scum bag I’m sure I would have claimed all sorts of expenses.
The girls in accounts used to tell me all sorts of stories about Sales Reps claims.
If I was a MP which would mean I was a corrupt lying scum bag I’m sure I would have claimed all sorts of expenses.
#2
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: RIP Tam.
Posts: 5,108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think most people would bend the truth a little for personnal gain.
Some of the expenses claims are not that bad its the ones who have properly taken the pee that annoy me, and they think it was ok to doso.
Some of the expenses claims are not that bad its the ones who have properly taken the pee that annoy me, and they think it was ok to doso.
#4
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
Yep probably, I'm so disorganised with my finances I'd be bound to do something that looked suspicious..
To be honest I'm getting more fedup with our media than our MPs at the mo, the reporting is so un-balanced and inflammatory.
Shore some of the MPs have taken the pee and I'm not happy about it, but most MPs are not lying swindlers at all, many go into politics to make difference rather than whinge like some on this forum(other threads not this one) I can understand the anger, I'm angry myself! but to hurl abuse at all mps and to say they are all in it for personal gain is a lode of tosh, be fecked if Id want to do there job even for the wage they are on, which isn't a lot when u consider what they have to do.( flame suite on)...as I say though there are some that are taking the pee, maybe we need some process to kick them out and vote for a replacement? rather than trial by a gossip shop media.
To be honest I'm getting more fedup with our media than our MPs at the mo, the reporting is so un-balanced and inflammatory.
Shore some of the MPs have taken the pee and I'm not happy about it, but most MPs are not lying swindlers at all, many go into politics to make difference rather than whinge like some on this forum(other threads not this one) I can understand the anger, I'm angry myself! but to hurl abuse at all mps and to say they are all in it for personal gain is a lode of tosh, be fecked if Id want to do there job even for the wage they are on, which isn't a lot when u consider what they have to do.( flame suite on)...as I say though there are some that are taking the pee, maybe we need some process to kick them out and vote for a replacement? rather than trial by a gossip shop media.
#7
Scooby Senior
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: West Yorks.
Posts: 4,130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well as an MP I would have known that 4 years ago a Freedom of Information request was submitted for MPs expenses and therefore would not have claimed for anything that looked even vaguely dodgy. Unfortunately the retarded f*ckwits who took the **** lacked such foresight, or perhaps assumed the British public would be ok with them using taxpayers money to fund lavish lifestyles.
Trending Topics
#8
Whilst it annoys me - the individuals concerned don't annoy me any more than someone with 6 kids still claiming child benefit does.
The vast majority of the claims that have been reported are in the rules; whilst they may be distasteful/immoral/a bit cheeky, there is nothing actually wrong with them.
The fact that they are allowed to claim for these things is what is at fault - I'm amazed at some of the claims that have been paid, but I'm a bit dubious of anyone who claims that they wouldn't wrangle their employer out of every little bit of expenses that they could get away with! I know I would!
The vast majority of the claims that have been reported are in the rules; whilst they may be distasteful/immoral/a bit cheeky, there is nothing actually wrong with them.
The fact that they are allowed to claim for these things is what is at fault - I'm amazed at some of the claims that have been paid, but I'm a bit dubious of anyone who claims that they wouldn't wrangle their employer out of every little bit of expenses that they could get away with! I know I would!
#9
Whilst it annoys me - the individuals concerned don't annoy me any more than someone with 6 kids still claiming child benefit does.
The vast majority of the claims that have been reported are in the rules; whilst they may be distasteful/immoral/a bit cheeky, there is nothing actually wrong with them.
The fact that they are allowed to claim for these things is what is at fault - I'm amazed at some of the claims that have been paid, but I'm a bit dubious of anyone who claims that they wouldn't wrangle their employer out of every little bit of expenses that they could get away with! I know I would!
The vast majority of the claims that have been reported are in the rules; whilst they may be distasteful/immoral/a bit cheeky, there is nothing actually wrong with them.
The fact that they are allowed to claim for these things is what is at fault - I'm amazed at some of the claims that have been paid, but I'm a bit dubious of anyone who claims that they wouldn't wrangle their employer out of every little bit of expenses that they could get away with! I know I would!
Les
#10
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
Darts aint sport lol like the name, whose the news reader that's on 92k? that's a pee take if they have a go at mps when they get paid that much. Prasius you best not have any plans to become an MP mate "I know I would", u just know that post will be dug up by the media and used against you and you'll be labelled as a swindler, or something worse.
#15
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Deepest Darkest Kernow
Posts: 4,404
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
During my time at a previous company we did just that! Well actually it was for my customers/agent in Korea where it was expected! One night my boss spent over £4k on his credit card - maxed it out, good lad.
Of course I never participated *cough cough*
Of course I never participated *cough cough*
#16
Scooby Regular
The fact that they are allowed to claim for these things is what is at fault - I'm amazed at some of the claims that have been paid, but I'm a bit dubious of anyone who claims that they wouldn't wrangle their employer out of every little bit of expenses that they could get away with! I know I would!
hanging baskets, dog food etc etc just do not meet this criteria
its not the rules per se its mainly the inerpretation application and enforcement
#17
How did you get a receipt?
#18
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Deepest Darkest Kernow
Posts: 4,404
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
We were lucky in the fact that our MD knew the score
We used to buy the bars chip's or $'s (a bit like a casino) on our credit card and naturally you'd get a receipt. The 'money' could then be used to buy drinks, food, dances etc etc - use your imagination. It would just be claimed as entertaining customers - a few customer names and bob's your uncle!
We used to buy the bars chip's or $'s (a bit like a casino) on our credit card and naturally you'd get a receipt. The 'money' could then be used to buy drinks, food, dances etc etc - use your imagination. It would just be claimed as entertaining customers - a few customer names and bob's your uncle!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post