Red light camers/Emergency vehicles
#4
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Notts, UK
Posts: 4,935
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yep,
I would fight it in court, remember take the emergency vehicle's number if possible.
Could be a life or death call and you'd have to be a complete **** not to let an emergency vehicle through.
One day it could be your own life on the line, I've been there myself.
Cheers
Lee
I would fight it in court, remember take the emergency vehicle's number if possible.
Could be a life or death call and you'd have to be a complete **** not to let an emergency vehicle through.
One day it could be your own life on the line, I've been there myself.
Cheers
Lee
#5
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Swilling coffee at my lab bench
Posts: 9,096
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Unfortunately, the law doesn't allow going through a red light, even if there's an emergency vehicle behind you. There's no exception provided.
I guess that if that vehicle is a police car, and the officer inside actually signals you to go through, then that would be OK because the police have the power to direct traffic. You could claim in court that you were signalled to go through the light by a police officer.
I guess that if that vehicle is a police car, and the officer inside actually signals you to go through, then that would be OK because the police have the power to direct traffic. You could claim in court that you were signalled to go through the light by a police officer.
#6
I wouldn't. I would try to move over as much as possible but wouldn't go through. Insurance companies aren't interested in the dynamics of points on a licence and 3 points for going through a red would be more harsh than three for a sp30.
AFIK emergency services are told not to encourage you to run a red.
AFIK emergency services are told not to encourage you to run a red.
#7
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Markyate.Imprezas owned:-wrx-sti5typeR-p1-uk22b-modded my00. Amongst others!
Posts: 8,541
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yep,
I would fight it in court, remember take the emergency vehicle's number if possible.
Could be a life or death call and you'd have to be a complete **** not to let an emergency vehicle through.
One day it could be your own life on the line, I've been there myself.
Cheers
Lee
I would fight it in court, remember take the emergency vehicle's number if possible.
Could be a life or death call and you'd have to be a complete **** not to let an emergency vehicle through.
One day it could be your own life on the line, I've been there myself.
Cheers
Lee
Still, we'd see what I'd do in the situation, but either way I'd be taking no points for it.
Trending Topics
#8
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Notts, UK
Posts: 4,935
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So are you saying you would sit at a red light with and Ambulance behind you with blues and two's on?
An Ambulance that could possibly have someone's Mother/Daughter/Father/Son/Wife/Husband in the back in a life threating situation and your conscience would allow you to just sit there?
I'm sorry I couldn't do that even if it meant that I maybe fined.
Magistrates do have the ability to not issue penatlties in exeptional circumstances.
Cheers
Lee
An Ambulance that could possibly have someone's Mother/Daughter/Father/Son/Wife/Husband in the back in a life threating situation and your conscience would allow you to just sit there?
I'm sorry I couldn't do that even if it meant that I maybe fined.
Magistrates do have the ability to not issue penatlties in exeptional circumstances.
Cheers
Lee
#9
So are you saying you would sit at a red light with and Ambulance behind you with blues and two's on?
An Ambulance that could possibly have someone's Mother/Daughter/Father/Son/Wife/Husband in the back in a life threating situation and your conscience would allow you to just sit there?
I'm sorry I couldn't do that even if it meant that I maybe fined.
An Ambulance that could possibly have someone's Mother/Daughter/Father/Son/Wife/Husband in the back in a life threating situation and your conscience would allow you to just sit there?
I'm sorry I couldn't do that even if it meant that I maybe fined.
Due to the fact the cameras do not discriminate nor have the ability to show discretion, peoples attittude will soon swing towards not breaking the law. As said above, if you have 9 points, mortgage, family to feed etc, you are taking a big gamble.
If the lights don't have a camera, thats a totally diferent scenario.
#10
Some one once told me that Post Office vans can go through red lights because they have the Queens head on them!!!!!!!!!!
LOL....LOL....Very Bizarre if true..........lolololol
LOL....LOL....Very Bizarre if true..........lolololol
#11
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sheffield; Rome of the North
Posts: 17,582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
*de minimis non curat praetor or de minimis non curat lex: the law does not concern itself with trivial matters (unfortunately no longer the case..... )
#12
Police - no. not if I had to go through a red light or mount the pavement.
I've had occasions to meet the three public services above and that is precisely what has precipitated my different approach. Sad to say it but imho the police have a long way to go to earn the respect of the general public and I lay the blame for this 50% at nu-labias door and 50% at the increasing number of woodentop jumped up little hitler plastic bobbies out there. Tw@s.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
LMAO at the Infraction for "Insulting other Members"
Does this mean that there is someone out there who considers themselves a "Woodentop Jumped up little Hitler Plastic Bobby" who takes offence at being called a TW@ ??
Last edited by jods; 08 November 2008 at 09:07 PM.
#13
If you get into a position where you can only release someone on blues and twos by running a red light, then you haven't been paying attention and you haven't been reading the road. Go and learn to drive
(In reality, they will slow down a bit and then drive down the other side of the road if it is really urgent)
(In reality, they will slow down a bit and then drive down the other side of the road if it is really urgent)
#14
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: London
Posts: 1,143
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#19
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Warrington
Posts: 4,554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have watched others trying to mount an 8" kerb from lane 2 onto a central reservation to get out of the way of an ambulance , I couldn't do it, a gap soon opened in lane 1
It would be quite simple for the law to be amended, adding the phrase "Thou shalt not pass a red traffic light unless moving out of the way of an emergency vehicle displaying blue lights and sounding its siren" should do it. But that would be too simple.
Surely if no accident is caused then there is no reason to prosecute?
It would be quite simple for the law to be amended, adding the phrase "Thou shalt not pass a red traffic light unless moving out of the way of an emergency vehicle displaying blue lights and sounding its siren" should do it. But that would be too simple.
Surely if no accident is caused then there is no reason to prosecute?
#22
Scooby Regular
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Here, There, Everywhere
Posts: 10,619
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Personally speaking, I'd sit there until the lights changed. It would be very hard though, as your conscience says get out of the way as someone life could be in danger.
However after watching a case on Watchdog (I think) about a bloke who did just that and got zapped by a traffic light camera. Went to court pretty sure he'd get it withdrawn due to the circumstance. Didn't go as planned. Guy was still prosecuted. 3 points and a fine. May have been more than the standard fine/points as he dared fight it.
However after watching a case on Watchdog (I think) about a bloke who did just that and got zapped by a traffic light camera. Went to court pretty sure he'd get it withdrawn due to the circumstance. Didn't go as planned. Guy was still prosecuted. 3 points and a fine. May have been more than the standard fine/points as he dared fight it.
#23
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: A powerslide near you
Posts: 10,261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
In most cases, you don't need to go through the junction (or even the light), just be moving over out the way.
Of course, if you've stopped one inch from the car in front or right on the line of the junction then you've dug your own grave!
#24
Yep,
I would fight it in court, remember take the emergency vehicle's number if possible.
Could be a life or death call and you'd have to be a complete **** not to let an emergency vehicle through.
One day it could be your own life on the line, I've been there myself.
Cheers
Lee
I would fight it in court, remember take the emergency vehicle's number if possible.
Could be a life or death call and you'd have to be a complete **** not to let an emergency vehicle through.
One day it could be your own life on the line, I've been there myself.
Cheers
Lee
There was a case however of some chap who moved forward to let an ambulance pass the lights, but in doing so he just managed to trip the camera behind him, he did not cross the lights. He was still fined even though his story was backed by the ambulance station in Court! I seem to remember this was posted on this forum once.
Les
#25
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: A powerslide near you
Posts: 10,261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I agree with what you say, it is the obviously correct action.
There was a case however of some chap who moved forward to let an ambulance pass the lights, but in doing so he just managed to trip the camera behind him, he did not cross the lights. He was still fined even though his story was backed by the ambulance station in Court! I seem to remember this was posted on this forum once.
Les
There was a case however of some chap who moved forward to let an ambulance pass the lights, but in doing so he just managed to trip the camera behind him, he did not cross the lights. He was still fined even though his story was backed by the ambulance station in Court! I seem to remember this was posted on this forum once.
Les
#28
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Markyate.Imprezas owned:-wrx-sti5typeR-p1-uk22b-modded my00. Amongst others!
Posts: 8,541
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#29
If it was a cop car, then to be totally honest I'm not 100% sure.
But if it was an ambulance or Fire engine then to me its a no brainer . . .
Get the F*ck out of the way!
If you're observant enough ( you use your mirrors), you will have seen / heard the emergency vehicle approaching, and should have moved out of the way before it gets behind you.
The number of times I've pulled over for an ambulance and a car following me has simply overtaken me because they haven't seen it
But if it was an ambulance or Fire engine then to me its a no brainer . . .
Get the F*ck out of the way!
If you're observant enough ( you use your mirrors), you will have seen / heard the emergency vehicle approaching, and should have moved out of the way before it gets behind you.
The number of times I've pulled over for an ambulance and a car following me has simply overtaken me because they haven't seen it
#30
As someone else said camera partnerships and magistrates are allowed to deal only in fact. If you did jump a red then the fact that it was for a very good and altruistic reason does not even nter the equation. It is an absolute offence. I therefore would not ease through a red if it had a 'computer says no' camera on it. I just couldn't deal with the hassle, cost, paperwork and days off work fighting the system.
They have caused this negative approach due to their greedy adherence to blind invoicing, statistics that big themselves up and due to a complete absence of common sense in many matters.
D