Latest Vulcan petition to Prime Minister
#1
Guest
Posts: n/a
Latest Vulcan petition to Prime Minister
#2
Not being funny, I'm a big fan of the Vulcan.
But don't you think in the current economic climate that No. 10 would really want to splash cash out on this project? I think the Discovery Channel should fund it and make a big long documentary out of it.
But don't you think in the current economic climate that No. 10 would really want to splash cash out on this project? I think the Discovery Channel should fund it and make a big long documentary out of it.
#6
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Wellingborough
Posts: 1,107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The thousands of people that have made the Vulcan to the Sky fundraising effort the BIGGEST bar none non humanatarian fund raising this country has ever seen would disagree with you !!!!
Last edited by finchyboy; 23 October 2008 at 09:24 PM.
#7
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Surrey/London borders.
Posts: 8,300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Trending Topics
#9
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Wellingborough
Posts: 1,107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That sort of attitude is why i had to tell my Son the other day that we used to be able to fly to New York in under 4 hour's !!!
He's entitle to his own opinion though.
He's entitle to his own opinion though.
#10
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Surrey/London borders.
Posts: 8,300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
No, I'm just not a plane-spotting geek
I wouldn't want any of the taxes I pay wasted on a piece of junk that serves no purpose.
If people want to keep it flying then let them pay for it privately.
I actually used to work on the Vulcan when I was in the RAF and still saw no reason for it then.
I wouldn't want any of the taxes I pay wasted on a piece of junk that serves no purpose.
If people want to keep it flying then let them pay for it privately.
I actually used to work on the Vulcan when I was in the RAF and still saw no reason for it then.
#12
No, I'm just not a plane-spotting geek
I wouldn't want any of the taxes I pay wasted on a piece of junk that serves no purpose.
If people want to keep it flying then let them pay for it privately.
I actually used to work on the Vulcan when I was in the RAF and still saw no reason for it then.
I wouldn't want any of the taxes I pay wasted on a piece of junk that serves no purpose.
If people want to keep it flying then let them pay for it privately.
I actually used to work on the Vulcan when I was in the RAF and still saw no reason for it then.
It actually paid a very large part in saving this country from nuclear destruction as I suspect you very well know.
Les
#14
It is in the same league as Spitfires and Lancasters and Hurricanes etc. People love to see them fly and it keeps the memories of what was achieved in their names alive. That alone is sufficient justfication for maintaining them.
Les
Les
#15
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Muppetising life
Posts: 15,449
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
They should definitely maintain it. Its a far more worthy cause then many of the other shocking wastes of money this gov comes up with. If you don't maintain these things they are gone forever. Its not like some other pointless monument that can be delayed
#16
#18
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (45)
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Huntingdon Cambs
Posts: 3,989
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I work on Raf Wyton and RAF Brampton and IMHO i think the money could be better spent else where even though its a stunning bit of kit but i think the times come for the country to stop waisting money on stuff thats not really needed IMHO If there was spare cash then i wouldn't see a problem but with the way the recession is going i think it is unfair to use tax payers money!
#19
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Far Corfe
Posts: 3,618
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I get quite emotional to see the Battle of Britain flight, but whilst I think the Vulcan is a magnificent aircraft its not really the same is it?
#20
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (45)
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Huntingdon Cambs
Posts: 3,989
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Back then there was only 2 still flying and the other was in Canada but think that 1 has no been grounded! "Think"
#21
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (45)
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Huntingdon Cambs
Posts: 3,989
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Lovely to see it but I dont think its in the same league as those planes that helped us beat our foes in a real war. I dont think one ever dropped a bomb in anger did it?
I get quite emotional to see the Battle of Britain flight, but whilst I think the Vulcan is a magnificent aircraft its not really the same is it?
I get quite emotional to see the Battle of Britain flight, but whilst I think the Vulcan is a magnificent aircraft its not really the same is it?
Very true and i see the sunset dance with the Vulcan fly by a few months ago at Raf Wyton.
#25
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (40)
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Marlow, Bucks.
Posts: 6,106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I work on Raf Wyton and RAF Brampton and IMHO i think the money could be better spent else where even though its a stunning bit of kit but i think the times come for the country to stop waisting money on stuff thats not really needed IMHO If there was spare cash then i wouldn't see a problem but with the way the recession is going i think it is unfair to use tax payers money!
#26
#27
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (40)
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Marlow, Bucks.
Posts: 6,106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Although the primary weapon for the Vulcan was nuclear, Vulcans could carry up to 21 x 1,000 pounds (454 kg) bombs in a secondary role. The only combat missions involving the Vulcan took place in the 1982 Falklands War with Argentina, when Vulcans, in the Black Buck operations flew the 3,380 nautical miles (6,260 km) from Ascension Island to Stanley.[6][7] There were three missions to bomb the airfield at Stanley; two to attack Argentine radar installations with missiles and two missions were cancelled.
#28
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: My turbo blows, air lots of it!!
Posts: 9,073
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i just paid £139.95 to renew my bloody TV license, perhaps we could create a petition to the PM saying if he dosent lower it were going to roll up the licenses and ram them up his ar$e next year
#29
Lovely to see it but I dont think its in the same league as those planes that helped us beat our foes in a real war. I dont think one ever dropped a bomb in anger did it?
I get quite emotional to see the Battle of Britain flight, but whilst I think the Vulcan is a magnificent aircraft its not really the same is it?
I get quite emotional to see the Battle of Britain flight, but whilst I think the Vulcan is a magnificent aircraft its not really the same is it?
It was a major part of the Nuclear Deterrent during the Cold War which you may not actually remember. It was ready to deliver a very large "bucket of sunshine" to the Eastern Bloc if there was any attack from them on the West.Initially there were always Vulcans on standby ready to take off in the case of such an attack. You have to realise that the Vulcan was feared by the Soviets right up to the time it was taken out of service. They knew that they could shoot some of them down but not enough to stop gross destruction of their own lands. They were ready to fly at any time of the day or night and in any weather on a low level attack and could also out turn any fighter at high level.
You also obviously don't know that during the Falklands War that the Vulcan flew the longest ever trip in history by a bomber aircraft in order to blast the runway so that the Argentine Air Force was unable to use the airfield for fighters which was of major significance in the winning of that war by the UK.
So just about everything you said was wrong!
Les
#30
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (40)
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Marlow, Bucks.
Posts: 6,106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You don't know too much about the history of the Vulcan by the looks of it.
It was a major part of the Nuclear Deterrent during the Cold War which you may not actually remember. It was ready to deliver a very large "bucket of sunshine" to the Eastern Bloc if there was any attack from them on the West.Initially there were always Vulcans on standby ready to take off in the case of such an attack. You have to realise that the Vulcan was feared by the Soviets right up to the time it was taken out of service. They knew that they could shoot some of them down but not enough to stop gross destruction of their own lands. They were ready to fly at any time of the day or night and in any weather on a low level attack and could also out turn any fighter at high level.
You also obviously don't know that during the Falklands War that the Vulcan flew the longest ever trip in history by a bomber aircraft in order to blast the runway so that the Argentine Air Force was unable to use the airfield for fighters which was of major significance in the winning of that war by the UK.
So just about everything you said was wrong!
Les
It was a major part of the Nuclear Deterrent during the Cold War which you may not actually remember. It was ready to deliver a very large "bucket of sunshine" to the Eastern Bloc if there was any attack from them on the West.Initially there were always Vulcans on standby ready to take off in the case of such an attack. You have to realise that the Vulcan was feared by the Soviets right up to the time it was taken out of service. They knew that they could shoot some of them down but not enough to stop gross destruction of their own lands. They were ready to fly at any time of the day or night and in any weather on a low level attack and could also out turn any fighter at high level.
You also obviously don't know that during the Falklands War that the Vulcan flew the longest ever trip in history by a bomber aircraft in order to blast the runway so that the Argentine Air Force was unable to use the airfield for fighters which was of major significance in the winning of that war by the UK.
So just about everything you said was wrong!
Les