Stamp duty is axed below £175,000
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 1,348
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Stamp duty is axed below £175,000
BBC NEWS | Politics | Stamp duty is axed below £175,000
Stamp duty is to be axed for a year on properties costing less than £175,000 in an effort to kick start the ailing housing market.
Stamp duty is to be axed for a year on properties costing less than £175,000 in an effort to kick start the ailing housing market.
#3
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Runway two seven right.
Posts: 6,652
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
LOL, it's a drop in the ocean. With house prices falling buyers are saving the amount this increase equates to every 10 days or so.
Govt has no ideas. Get rid.
Govt has no ideas. Get rid.
#5
Pontificating
What a joke
Their leaking that this "might" happen some weeks ago effectively brought the market to a stand still as well as removing more thousands from the values and when they finally come out with it it's on properties less that £175,000.00. 1 bedroom studio flat anyone ?
Someone needs to give these guys their final written warning, come on Liz as their employer sort it out
Their leaking that this "might" happen some weeks ago effectively brought the market to a stand still as well as removing more thousands from the values and when they finally come out with it it's on properties less that £175,000.00. 1 bedroom studio flat anyone ?
Someone needs to give these guys their final written warning, come on Liz as their employer sort it out
#7
Scooby Regular
It could actually increase the value of some homes.
My mother recently sold a flat in Oxfordshire and although it could easily have gone for over £130K but she went for £125K to make it a more attractive purchase.
My mother recently sold a flat in Oxfordshire and although it could easily have gone for over £130K but she went for £125K to make it a more attractive purchase.
Trending Topics
#8
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Worthing..
Posts: 7,575
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The average property price is lower than £175,000 so it will reduce for quite alot of people.
However, given that people are unwilling to spend at all, or ar eunable to get a mortgage, I doubt a reduction of £1,750 is going to make any difference.
They need to stop tinkering, the market is adjusting; let it do it. It will be more painful if they don't.
However, given that people are unwilling to spend at all, or ar eunable to get a mortgage, I doubt a reduction of £1,750 is going to make any difference.
They need to stop tinkering, the market is adjusting; let it do it. It will be more painful if they don't.
Last edited by PeteBrant; 02 September 2008 at 09:39 AM.
#9
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: There is only one God - Elvis!
Posts: 8,328
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The Goverment are in a desperate situation and are panicking now, even with their new measures they're going to suffer such a humiliating defeat come election time and will be out on there *****.
The British public has had enough to be quite frank and will vote accordingly
The British public has had enough to be quite frank and will vote accordingly
#10
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: God's promised land
Posts: 80,907
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The average property price is lower than £175,000 so it will reduce for quite alot of people.
However, given that people are unwilling to spend at all, or ar eunable to get a mortgage, I doubt a reduction of £1,750 is going to make any difference.
They need to stop tinkering, the market is adjusting; let it do it. It will be more painful if they don't.
However, given that people are unwilling to spend at all, or ar eunable to get a mortgage, I doubt a reduction of £1,750 is going to make any difference.
They need to stop tinkering, the market is adjusting; let it do it. It will be more painful if they don't.
#11
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: CHIPP'N HAM
Posts: 3,931
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
plus it's hardly going to encourage the people who are selling their £175k (or less) houses, so all it will do is help shift the cheap new build stuff.
Well done
Well done
#12
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Worthing..
Posts: 7,575
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If you bought a property for the same price today, you pay zero.
How are you not saving £1750?
#13
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Dull White BMW
Posts: 5,052
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What would help is to move the £250k threshold up a bit. However, I agree with Pete, the market is overpriced and needs to correct although for the Government to admit this would be political suicide. Like they can get more unpopular!
Steve
Steve
#15
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Worthing..
Posts: 7,575
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well seeing as the leaked reports effectively stopped house sales in thier tracks (why the **** didn't theey just come out and say they were going to do it?) it probably doesn;t affect that many people.
That said, I would imagine that many buyers dropped their offer price by the stamp duty cost to cover themselves.
#17
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: God's promised land
Posts: 80,907
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That was my point, the marginal rate (i love marginal rates, me) rather than the outright saving which, as you correctly point out, could be £1,750. If anyone bought after Darling had suggested a tax break window, well, more fool them.
#18
Why do they persist with things like HIPS as well? Scrap it,its unpoular with everyone except the government.
Agreed on prices thoug.They have to come down because no way are lenders going to go back to the sort of lending practices that caused the boom.
People will have to face the fact they will need at least 10% Deposit,can only (in most cases) borrow 3x salary so I'm afraid houses will have to come down to meet wages.
Stamp duty means sod all in the great scheme of things
(And when will one decent reporter ask Brown about Boom and Bust?)
Agreed on prices thoug.They have to come down because no way are lenders going to go back to the sort of lending practices that caused the boom.
People will have to face the fact they will need at least 10% Deposit,can only (in most cases) borrow 3x salary so I'm afraid houses will have to come down to meet wages.
Stamp duty means sod all in the great scheme of things
(And when will one decent reporter ask Brown about Boom and Bust?)
#20
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Worthing..
Posts: 7,575
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I actually like the principle behind HIPS, just not the execution
Why should conveyancing solicitors et al get the same money multiple times for doing the same job for buyers when one falls through?
Its like an MoT for your car; You don;t get the MoT redone if a sale falls through, nor is it the buyers responsbility.
Surveys/conveyancing etc should be the responsibility of the seller, not the buyer.
Why should conveyancing solicitors et al get the same money multiple times for doing the same job for buyers when one falls through?
Its like an MoT for your car; You don;t get the MoT redone if a sale falls through, nor is it the buyers responsbility.
Surveys/conveyancing etc should be the responsibility of the seller, not the buyer.
#21
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Bring back infractions!
Posts: 4,554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#22
The main thing behind it is energy efficiency junk
Most basic example.
Someone sees a beautiful 300 year old cottage.Part of HIPS pack says what a load of non double glazed centrally heated junk. Score...3/100.
Its all part of the rubbish green argument and there are just so many reasons why getting one does not help sellers or buyers.Just the people who prepare the packs
Most basic example.
Someone sees a beautiful 300 year old cottage.Part of HIPS pack says what a load of non double glazed centrally heated junk. Score...3/100.
Its all part of the rubbish green argument and there are just so many reasons why getting one does not help sellers or buyers.Just the people who prepare the packs
#23
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: riding the crest of a wave ...
Posts: 46,493
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes
on
12 Posts
I actually like the principle behind HIPS, just not the execution
Why should conveyancing solicitors et al get the same money multiple times for doing the same job for buyers when one falls through?
Its like an MoT for your car; You don;t get the MoT redone if a sale falls through, nor is it the buyers responsbility.
Surveys/conveyancing etc should be the responsibility of the seller, not the buyer.
Why should conveyancing solicitors et al get the same money multiple times for doing the same job for buyers when one falls through?
Its like an MoT for your car; You don;t get the MoT redone if a sale falls through, nor is it the buyers responsbility.
Surveys/conveyancing etc should be the responsibility of the seller, not the buyer.
#25
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Worthing..
Posts: 7,575
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The main thing behind it is energy efficiency junk
Most basic example.
Someone sees a beautiful 300 year old cottage.Part of HIPS pack says what a load of non double glazed centrally heated junk. Score...3/100.
Its all part of the rubbish green argument and there are just so many reasons why getting one does not help sellers or buyers.Just the people who prepare the packs
Most basic example.
Someone sees a beautiful 300 year old cottage.Part of HIPS pack says what a load of non double glazed centrally heated junk. Score...3/100.
Its all part of the rubbish green argument and there are just so many reasons why getting one does not help sellers or buyers.Just the people who prepare the packs
#28
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Worthing..
Posts: 7,575
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts