Notices
Non Scooby Related Anything Non-Scooby related

Stamp duty is axed below £175,000

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02 September 2008, 09:15 AM
  #1  
gazza-uk
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
gazza-uk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 1,348
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Stamp duty is axed below £175,000

BBC NEWS | Politics | Stamp duty is axed below £175,000
Stamp duty is to be axed for a year on properties costing less than £175,000 in an effort to kick start the ailing housing market.
Old 02 September 2008, 09:19 AM
  #2  
TelBoy
Scooby Regular
 
TelBoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: God's promised land
Posts: 80,907
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Why bother? Is a £50k extension to a 1% tax really going to make any difference?

Darling, you are the weakest link, goodbye.
Old 02 September 2008, 09:21 AM
  #3  
FlightMan
Scooby Regular
 
FlightMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Runway two seven right.
Posts: 6,652
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

LOL, it's a drop in the ocean. With house prices falling buyers are saving the amount this increase equates to every 10 days or so.

Govt has no ideas. Get rid.
Old 02 September 2008, 09:24 AM
  #4  
TopBanana
Scooby Regular
 
TopBanana's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 9,781
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

This is like pushing on a piece of string. Ridiculous, but I suppose it ends the uncertainly they caused by leaking the rumours.
Old 02 September 2008, 09:26 AM
  #5  
Funkii Munkii
Pontificating
 
Funkii Munkii's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Conrod Straight
Posts: 11,574
Received 9 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

What a joke

Their leaking that this "might" happen some weeks ago effectively brought the market to a stand still as well as removing more thousands from the values and when they finally come out with it it's on properties less that £175,000.00. 1 bedroom studio flat anyone ?

Someone needs to give these guys their final written warning, come on Liz as their employer sort it out
Old 02 September 2008, 09:30 AM
  #6  
boxst
Scooby Regular
 
boxst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 1998
Posts: 11,905
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

That will do very little to help with anything. The free loans for 5 years for first time buyers for 30% is slightly better.

Steve
Old 02 September 2008, 09:31 AM
  #7  
EddScott
Scooby Regular
 
EddScott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: West Wales
Posts: 12,573
Received 64 Likes on 32 Posts
Default

It could actually increase the value of some homes.

My mother recently sold a flat in Oxfordshire and although it could easily have gone for over £130K but she went for £125K to make it a more attractive purchase.

Trending Topics

Old 02 September 2008, 09:32 AM
  #8  
PeteBrant
Scooby Regular
 
PeteBrant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Worthing..
Posts: 7,575
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The average property price is lower than £175,000 so it will reduce for quite alot of people.

However, given that people are unwilling to spend at all, or ar eunable to get a mortgage, I doubt a reduction of £1,750 is going to make any difference.

They need to stop tinkering, the market is adjusting; let it do it. It will be more painful if they don't.

Last edited by PeteBrant; 02 September 2008 at 09:39 AM.
Old 02 September 2008, 09:32 AM
  #9  
The Chief
Scooby Regular
 
The Chief's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: There is only one God - Elvis!
Posts: 8,328
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The Goverment are in a desperate situation and are panicking now, even with their new measures they're going to suffer such a humiliating defeat come election time and will be out on there *****.

The British public has had enough to be quite frank and will vote accordingly
Old 02 September 2008, 09:45 AM
  #10  
TelBoy
Scooby Regular
 
TelBoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: God's promised land
Posts: 80,907
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PeteBrant
The average property price is lower than £175,000 so it will reduce for quite alot of people.

However, given that people are unwilling to spend at all, or ar eunable to get a mortgage, I doubt a reduction of £1,750 is going to make any difference.

They need to stop tinkering, the market is adjusting; let it do it. It will be more painful if they don't.
You what? All he's done is extend the upper limit from £125k to £175k, so nobody has saved £1,750 at all, it's £500 maximum. Tinkering at its worst.
Old 02 September 2008, 09:49 AM
  #11  
scooby L
Scooby Regular
 
scooby L's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: CHIPP'N HAM
Posts: 3,931
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

plus it's hardly going to encourage the people who are selling their £175k (or less) houses, so all it will do is help shift the cheap new build stuff.

Well done
Old 02 September 2008, 09:50 AM
  #12  
PeteBrant
Scooby Regular
 
PeteBrant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Worthing..
Posts: 7,575
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TelBoy
You what? All he's done is extend the upper limit from £125k to £175k, so nobody has saved £1,750 at all, it's £500 maximum. Tinkering at its worst.
If you bought a property yesterday for £174,999 you would pay £1749.99 in stamp duty.

If you bought a property for the same price today, you pay zero.

How are you not saving £1750?
Old 02 September 2008, 09:56 AM
  #13  
Steve vRS
Scooby Regular
 
Steve vRS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Dull White BMW
Posts: 5,052
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

What would help is to move the £250k threshold up a bit. However, I agree with Pete, the market is overpriced and needs to correct although for the Government to admit this would be political suicide. Like they can get more unpopular!

Steve
Old 02 September 2008, 09:59 AM
  #14  
darts_aint_sport
Scooby Regular
 
darts_aint_sport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 685
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PeteBrant
If you bought a property yesterday for £174,999 you would pay £1749.99 in stamp duty.
And how p*ssed off would you be
Old 02 September 2008, 10:03 AM
  #15  
PeteBrant
Scooby Regular
 
PeteBrant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Worthing..
Posts: 7,575
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by darts_aint_sport


And how p*ssed off would you be


Well seeing as the leaked reports effectively stopped house sales in thier tracks (why the **** didn't theey just come out and say they were going to do it?) it probably doesn;t affect that many people.


That said, I would imagine that many buyers dropped their offer price by the stamp duty cost to cover themselves.
Old 02 September 2008, 10:04 AM
  #16  
scooby L
Scooby Regular
 
scooby L's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: CHIPP'N HAM
Posts: 3,931
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default



But if you'd just bought a house knowing the stamp duty threshold was going to be "adjusted" then you deserve all you get
Old 02 September 2008, 10:06 AM
  #17  
TelBoy
Scooby Regular
 
TelBoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: God's promised land
Posts: 80,907
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

That was my point, the marginal rate (i love marginal rates, me) rather than the outright saving which, as you correctly point out, could be £1,750. If anyone bought after Darling had suggested a tax break window, well, more fool them.
Old 02 September 2008, 10:11 AM
  #18  
lozgti
Scooby Regular
 
lozgti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,490
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Why do they persist with things like HIPS as well? Scrap it,its unpoular with everyone except the government.

Agreed on prices thoug.They have to come down because no way are lenders going to go back to the sort of lending practices that caused the boom.

People will have to face the fact they will need at least 10% Deposit,can only (in most cases) borrow 3x salary so I'm afraid houses will have to come down to meet wages.

Stamp duty means sod all in the great scheme of things

(And when will one decent reporter ask Brown about Boom and Bust?)
Old 02 September 2008, 10:13 AM
  #19  
dpb
Scooby Regular
 
dpb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: riding the crest of a wave ...
Posts: 46,493
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

Cheap bribe to keep in with the electorate - itll work as well as anything else they can come up with
Old 02 September 2008, 10:17 AM
  #20  
PeteBrant
Scooby Regular
 
PeteBrant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Worthing..
Posts: 7,575
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I actually like the principle behind HIPS, just not the execution

Why should conveyancing solicitors et al get the same money multiple times for doing the same job for buyers when one falls through?

Its like an MoT for your car; You don;t get the MoT redone if a sale falls through, nor is it the buyers responsbility.

Surveys/conveyancing etc should be the responsibility of the seller, not the buyer.
Old 02 September 2008, 10:23 AM
  #21  
Coffin Dodger
Scooby Regular
 
Coffin Dodger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Bring back infractions!
Posts: 4,554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PeteBrant
If you bought a property yesterday for £174,999 you would pay £1749.99 in stamp duty.

If you bought a property for the same price today, you pay zero.

How are you not saving £1750?
Because you are only saving £1749.99
Old 02 September 2008, 10:24 AM
  #22  
lozgti
Scooby Regular
 
lozgti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,490
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The main thing behind it is energy efficiency junk

Most basic example.

Someone sees a beautiful 300 year old cottage.Part of HIPS pack says what a load of non double glazed centrally heated junk. Score...3/100.

Its all part of the rubbish green argument and there are just so many reasons why getting one does not help sellers or buyers.Just the people who prepare the packs
Old 02 September 2008, 10:28 AM
  #23  
dpb
Scooby Regular
 
dpb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: riding the crest of a wave ...
Posts: 46,493
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PeteBrant
I actually like the principle behind HIPS, just not the execution

Why should conveyancing solicitors et al get the same money multiple times for doing the same job for buyers when one falls through?

Its like an MoT for your car; You don;t get the MoT redone if a sale falls through, nor is it the buyers responsbility.

Surveys/conveyancing etc should be the responsibility of the seller, not the buyer.
Seems fare enough if you left your deposit with the seller if you changed your mind
Old 02 September 2008, 10:34 AM
  #24  
PeteBrant
Scooby Regular
 
PeteBrant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Worthing..
Posts: 7,575
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Coffin Dodger
Because you are only saving £1749.99
Old 02 September 2008, 10:35 AM
  #25  
PeteBrant
Scooby Regular
 
PeteBrant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Worthing..
Posts: 7,575
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by lozgti
The main thing behind it is energy efficiency junk

Most basic example.

Someone sees a beautiful 300 year old cottage.Part of HIPS pack says what a load of non double glazed centrally heated junk. Score...3/100.

Its all part of the rubbish green argument and there are just so many reasons why getting one does not help sellers or buyers.Just the people who prepare the packs
Yup I agree the energy efficiency side needs looking at.
Old 02 September 2008, 11:14 AM
  #26  
unclebuck
Scooby Regular
 
unclebuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Talk to the hand....
Posts: 13,331
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs down

They are easing our pain - we must thank them......





Old 02 September 2008, 11:35 AM
  #27  
Leslie
Scooby Regular
 
Leslie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 39,877
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

What kind of a property can you get these days for £175K or less?

Les
Old 02 September 2008, 11:37 AM
  #28  
PeteBrant
Scooby Regular
 
PeteBrant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Worthing..
Posts: 7,575
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Leslie
What kind of a property can you get these days for £175K or less?

Les

An average one. The average property price in the UK is £168,000.
Old 02 September 2008, 11:38 AM
  #29  
dpb
Scooby Regular
 
dpb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: riding the crest of a wave ...
Posts: 46,493
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

Exactly Les

Before Nu Labia - a good sized detached house that was *worth* 175
Old 02 September 2008, 12:26 PM
  #30  
J4CKO
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
J4CKO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 19,384
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Whats next, A free Doormat with every house over 250k coutersy of the government ?


Quick Reply: Stamp duty is axed below £175,000



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:05 PM.