madness - who does not understand what "10 items or less" means?
01 September 2008, 12:10 AM
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 1,348
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
madness - who does not understand what "10 items or less" means?
BBC NEWS | Business | Tesco checks out wording change
Tesco is to change the wording of signs on its fast-track checkouts to avoid any linguistic dispute. The supermarket giant is to replace its current "10 items or less" notices with signs saying "Up to 10 items".
Tesco is to change the wording of signs on its fast-track checkouts to avoid any linguistic dispute. The supermarket giant is to replace its current "10 items or less" notices with signs saying "Up to 10 items".
01 September 2008, 12:33 AM
#7
As much as I don't like the whole 10 items or less thing, I really can't understand why they need to re-word it. It is fairly simple, even for stupid people to understand what that actually means.
Justifying some people's jobs I think. Take it from me, working in retail, this crap goes on all the time.
Justifying some people's jobs I think. Take it from me, working in retail, this crap goes on all the time.
Trending Topics
01 September 2008, 12:35 AM
#9
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
01 September 2008, 12:37 AM
#11
Scooby Regular
As much as I don't like the whole 10 items or less thing, I really can't understand why they need to re-word it. It is fairly simple, even for stupid people to understand what that actually means.
Justifying some people's jobs I think. Take it from me, working in retail, this crap goes on all the time.
Justifying some people's jobs I think. Take it from me, working in retail, this crap goes on all the time.
ere there really are stupid people about,you know the ones that can't read but are claiming hundreds a week on benefits,and im amazed there isnt a post up saying the sign is in ten different languages,and English being the last..
01 September 2008, 12:40 AM
#13
Scooby Regular
Does he look bovvered, does he, eh ? Eh ?
To this day, I haven't infracted anyone except the **** spammers who appear in the Scoobynet Live Forum overnight. I find it a little sad really. Having said that, I've just spent five minutes voting all Tam's recent post positive
To this day, I haven't infracted anyone except the **** spammers who appear in the Scoobynet Live Forum overnight. I find it a little sad really. Having said that, I've just spent five minutes voting all Tam's recent post positive
01 September 2008, 12:41 AM
#14
Scooby Regular
Shame, I like a good rebel 
That'll be it for in here tonight then, 'moff to watch a DVD and while away the last 5 1/2 hours of my night shift
I might be back if anything interesting happens, otherwise I might look at pictures of nipples if I can find any
That'll be it for in here tonight then, 'moff to watch a DVD and while away the last 5 1/2 hours of my night shift
I might be back if anything interesting happens, otherwise I might look at pictures of nipples if I can find any
Last edited by corradoboy; 01 September 2008 at 12:45 AM.
01 September 2008, 12:47 AM
#16
Does he look bovvered, does he, eh ? Eh ?
To this day, I haven't infracted anyone except the **** spammers who appear in the Scoobynet Live Forum overnight. I find it a little sad really. Having said that, I've just spent five minutes voting all Tam's recent post positive
To this day, I haven't infracted anyone except the **** spammers who appear in the Scoobynet Live Forum overnight. I find it a little sad really. Having said that, I've just spent five minutes voting all Tam's recent post positive
01 September 2008, 12:54 AM
#17
Scooby Regular
01 September 2008, 01:17 AM
#25
BANNED
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: In exile :D
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
you!
01 September 2008, 02:18 AM
#29
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (22)
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Doncaster, S. Yorks.
Posts: 21,415
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
would the retarded w4nkwr who infracted Tam like to stand up and have an educated debate about the post, or would you rather have all of Scoobynet know you are a half brain with an infraction button?
p.s. - maybe you don't know this, but it only takes about 5 seconds with the right software to find out who you are. I have the right software and at lunchtime time tomorrow I might just decide to let the Scoobynet Massive know what a retard you really are...... then again - I might spend a few days making you show yourself to be the **** that you are, but I think you might just do that for me
p.s. - maybe you don't know this, but it only takes about 5 seconds with the right software to find out who you are. I have the right software and at lunchtime time tomorrow I might just decide to let the Scoobynet Massive know what a retard you really are...... then again - I might spend a few days making you show yourself to be the **** that you are, but I think you might just do that for me
I think a couple of the infractions were for deliberate abuse of the swear filter. If you remember back to February last year, I was banned for this. Basically I deliberatley changed a couple of the letters in cvnt a different colour to bypass the swear filter, the same as what Tam has done. So that is my guess as to why he has (or should have recieved) infractions.
For the record FB, feel free to 'check me out' if you wanted to mate, I've only just seen the thread so couldn't have zapped Tambob.
Also, after apologising to webby, I was reinstated. Was a thread in policy I think where a few members revolted against my ban.So in a sentance I'd have thought breaking a T & C of the site, (more than once) has got him banned. He could say 'retard', 'spaccer' or whatever a 1,000 times, but once you edit your post and change a couple of letters colour etc and fiddle about with it, like me, you leave yourself wide open.
Bit ****, but thats how it is
