Notices
Non Scooby Related Anything Non-Scooby related

No joking this time. Qantas 7474 emergency descent..

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 25, 2008 | 09:54 AM
  #1  
FlightMan's Avatar
FlightMan
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 6,652
Likes: 0
From: Runway two seven right.
Default No joking this time. Qantas 7474 emergency descent..

BBC NEWS | World | Asia-Pacific | Hole forces Qantas plane to land


Good job the crew. Tough old birds those 747's!
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2008 | 09:56 AM
  #2  
DCI Gene Hunt's Avatar
DCI Gene Hunt
Scooby Senior
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 14,333
Likes: 0
From: RIP - Tam the bam & Andy the Jock
Default

''There was a rush of wind as the air pressure came down. It got people's attention"
It would focus the mind somewhat
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2008 | 10:01 AM
  #3  
f1_fan's Avatar
f1_fan
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
From: .
Default

Flightman, A new username perhaps? My I suggest Clairvoyant?
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2008 | 10:06 AM
  #4  
j4ckos mate's Avatar
j4ckos mate
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,283
Likes: 0
Default

dont believe you this time
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2008 | 10:18 AM
  #5  
Scoob99's Avatar
Scoob99
Scooby Regular
20 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 7,655
Likes: 0
From: Skoda Kamiq Monte Carlo 7 Speed DSG now bought and loving it!!!!!
Default

Kin Ell anyone feel a draft in here well done to all the crew, all I can say is my Ar$e would have been keeping up with the engines
Cheers
Colin
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2008 | 10:18 AM
  #6  
pimmo2000's Avatar
pimmo2000
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 14,661
Likes: 5
From: On a small Island near France
Default

How many will sue !!
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2008 | 10:21 AM
  #7  
lozgti's Avatar
lozgti
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,490
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by pimmo2000
How many will sue !!
I know.Aren't humans complete ar**s nowadays.As if being alive isn't good enough.

Well done pilots (who must have been thinking 'please stay on wing,please stay on')
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2008 | 10:33 AM
  #9  
TelBoy's Avatar
TelBoy
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 80,907
Likes: 0
From: God's promised land
Default

Flightman, do you think the increase in aviation fuel costs has led any airlines to compromise on safety, or are aircraft checks still as rigorous as ever?
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2008 | 10:56 AM
  #11  
andys's Avatar
andys
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jun 1999
Posts: 779
Likes: 0
Default

wonder if its terroist related?
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2008 | 11:42 AM
  #12  
billythekid's Avatar
billythekid
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,574
Likes: 0
Default

Looks like bird strike damage to me.
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2008 | 11:43 AM
  #13  
SirFozzalot's Avatar
SirFozzalot
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 19,633
Likes: 1
From: Essex
Default

Scary stuff! Glad the pilots managed to get it down safely!
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2008 | 11:47 AM
  #14  
movi-star's Avatar
movi-star
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 704
Likes: 0
From: at a petrol pump somewhere
Default

Looks like something has gone bang in the Luggage holdall, could have been deliberate.
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2008 | 12:02 PM
  #15  
FlightMan's Avatar
FlightMan
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 6,652
Likes: 0
From: Runway two seven right.
Default

Originally Posted by TelBoy
Flightman, do you think the increase in aviation fuel costs has led any airlines to compromise on safety, or are aircraft checks still as rigorous as ever?
All I'll say is that I was offered QF to Melbourne on a business trip earlier this year. I politely declined and went BA via Sydney instead.

To those people reading reports of "plunging 20,000ft " It's media bullsh!t.

The aircraft was a 30,000ft and breathable air is around 10,000ft. So it rapidly descended ( not plunged ) under the pilots control to where it was safe for passengers to remove the masks. A guy on Radio 5 earlier who was on the flight said " Well, you could tell we were descending, but nothing more than on a normal flight "

Like I said, media bullshi!t.

Last edited by FlightMan; Jul 25, 2008 at 12:06 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2008 | 12:05 PM
  #16  
TelBoy's Avatar
TelBoy
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 80,907
Likes: 0
From: God's promised land
Default

Yeah but on heresay or what you know for a fact?
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2008 | 12:15 PM
  #17  
DCI Gene Hunt's Avatar
DCI Gene Hunt
Scooby Senior
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 14,333
Likes: 0
From: RIP - Tam the bam & Andy the Jock
Default

If it was a 747C variant it will already be within the Ageing Airplane Program, which was a Boeing initiative to increase the level of inspections regarding the structural integrity of older aircraft.

The 747 itself is indeed a tough old bird however I would place emphasis on the "old" within that statement.....
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2008 | 12:15 PM
  #18  
FlightMan's Avatar
FlightMan
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 6,652
Likes: 0
From: Runway two seven right.
Default

Originally Posted by TelBoy
Yeah but on heresay or what you know for a fact?
What I know, and what I'll say here are two different things. I did fly, quite happily I'll add, QF on 4 separate flights whilst in OZ.

You can draw your own conclusions.
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2008 | 12:18 PM
  #19  
TelBoy's Avatar
TelBoy
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 80,907
Likes: 0
From: God's promised land
Default

I hate riddles Spit it out man
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2008 | 12:18 PM
  #20  
Account deleted by request's Avatar
Account deleted by request
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,832
Likes: 0
Default

What exactly is it you do flightman, you appear to have a fantastic knowledge of airplanes.

I doubt a birdstrike could happen at 30000+ft and it would have to be a bloody big bird to cause 2.5-3m of damage. I'm no expert though.

chop
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2008 | 12:22 PM
  #21  
j4ckos mate's Avatar
j4ckos mate
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,283
Likes: 0
Default

he is a plane spotter
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2008 | 12:24 PM
  #22  
FlightMan's Avatar
FlightMan
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 6,652
Likes: 0
From: Runway two seven right.
Default

Originally Posted by DCI Gene Hunt
If it was a 747C variant it will already be within the Ageing Airplane Program, which was a Boeing initiative to increase the level of inspections regarding the structural integrity of older aircraft.

The 747 itself is indeed a tough old bird however I would place emphasis on the "old" within that statement.....
I believe the a/c was VH-OJH. First flight was 1990 so its not an old aircraft.

Its also the same a/c that ran off the runway in Bangkok in 1999.
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2008 | 12:26 PM
  #23  
KiwiGTI's Avatar
KiwiGTI
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,631
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by FlightMan
I believe the a/c was VH-OJH. First flight was 1990 so its not an old aircraft.

Its also the same a/c that ran off the runway in Bangkok in 1999.
I thought it was VH-OJK? It has just come out of maintenance in Australia where it had serious corrosion problems found during an IFE upgrade.
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2008 | 12:31 PM
  #24  
Shark Man's Avatar
Shark Man
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 7,498
Likes: 0
From: Ascended to the next level
Default

For a second I thought it was yet "another" 747 cargo door failure. On closer inspection the door is perfectly intact.

Is there a vent located around there on the underside?
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2008 | 12:32 PM
  #25  
FlightMan's Avatar
FlightMan
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 6,652
Likes: 0
From: Runway two seven right.
Default

I'd be astonished it it was as bird strike. Normally there is blood and remnants splattered across the area hit, so I doubt it very much. 30,000ft is just too high.

I'd guess ( and it is just a guess ) it's an issue with the cargo door. Something similar happened to a UA 747 out of LAX in 1989. IIRC Accident Investigation did a programme on it. Same sort of scenario. A "bang/thump" loss of cabin pressure. Rapid decent to a safe landing. I think in that incident debris meant two engines were shutdown. That didn't happen in this case.

And as Jacko's mate knows, I don't possess one a/c registration of any note!
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2008 | 12:39 PM
  #26  
FlightMan's Avatar
FlightMan
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 6,652
Likes: 0
From: Runway two seven right.
Default

Originally Posted by KiwiGTI
I thought it was VH-OJK? It has just come out of maintenance in Australia where it had serious corrosion problems found during an IFE upgrade.
Kiwi, yes, your spot on. I've just spoken to a QF contact at LHR and it's OJK.

First flew 1991 and has just had an overhaul.
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2008 | 12:43 PM
  #27  
FlightMan's Avatar
FlightMan
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 6,652
Likes: 0
From: Runway two seven right.
Default

OK, nothing to do with the cargo door. What do you think the pilot is thinking? "SHEEEET" springs to mind.

Reply
Old Jul 25, 2008 | 12:51 PM
  #28  
DCI Gene Hunt's Avatar
DCI Gene Hunt
Scooby Senior
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 14,333
Likes: 0
From: RIP - Tam the bam & Andy the Jock
Default

...are they bags I can see in the hole? I thought they all went inside baggage containers.....
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2008 | 12:53 PM
  #29  
TelBoy's Avatar
TelBoy
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 80,907
Likes: 0
From: God's promised land
Default

I know **** all about planes, but i'm surprised this sort of thing doesn't happen a lot more regularly on something that moves along at 500mph+
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2008 | 12:55 PM
  #30  
DCI Gene Hunt's Avatar
DCI Gene Hunt
Scooby Senior
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 14,333
Likes: 0
From: RIP - Tam the bam & Andy the Jock
Default

There isn't much between you and the outside either....
Reply



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:24 AM.