No joking this time. Qantas 7474 emergency descent..
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Runway two seven right.
Posts: 6,652
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
No joking this time. Qantas 7474 emergency descent..
BBC NEWS | World | Asia-Pacific | Hole forces Qantas plane to land
Good job the crew. Tough old birds those 747's!
Good job the crew. Tough old birds those 747's!
#5
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Jaguar 3.0 sport now bought, Am loving it!!!!!
Posts: 7,653
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Kin Ell anyone feel a draft in here well done to all the crew, all I can say is my Ar$e would have been keeping up with the engines
Cheers
Colin
Cheers
Colin
#7
Trending Topics
#9
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: God's promised land
Posts: 80,907
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Flightman, do you think the increase in aviation fuel costs has led any airlines to compromise on safety, or are aircraft checks still as rigorous as ever?
#10
Guest
Posts: n/a
Just been reading this on Sky News, plunging 20,000 feet must have been a bit of a shock. Every time I read of panic on an airplane I can't help but think of the panicking scene in the film Airplane. Imagine having to get back on another plane to finish your journey after that. I was going to say i'd get a boat the rest of the way but with the Phillipines record on ferries actually i'd rather get back on a plane!
Last edited by Bravo2zero_sps; 25 July 2008 at 10:59 AM.
#15
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Runway two seven right.
Posts: 6,652
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
To those people reading reports of "plunging 20,000ft " It's media bullsh!t.
The aircraft was a 30,000ft and breathable air is around 10,000ft. So it rapidly descended ( not plunged ) under the pilots control to where it was safe for passengers to remove the masks. A guy on Radio 5 earlier who was on the flight said " Well, you could tell we were descending, but nothing more than on a normal flight "
Like I said, media bullshi!t.
Last edited by FlightMan; 25 July 2008 at 12:06 PM.
#17
Scooby Senior
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: RIP - Tam the bam & Andy the Jock
Posts: 14,333
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If it was a 747C variant it will already be within the Ageing Airplane Program, which was a Boeing initiative to increase the level of inspections regarding the structural integrity of older aircraft.
The 747 itself is indeed a tough old bird however I would place emphasis on the "old" within that statement.....
The 747 itself is indeed a tough old bird however I would place emphasis on the "old" within that statement.....
#18
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Runway two seven right.
Posts: 6,652
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#20
What exactly is it you do flightman, you appear to have a fantastic knowledge of airplanes.
I doubt a birdstrike could happen at 30000+ft and it would have to be a bloody big bird to cause 2.5-3m of damage. I'm no expert though.
chop
I doubt a birdstrike could happen at 30000+ft and it would have to be a bloody big bird to cause 2.5-3m of damage. I'm no expert though.
chop
#22
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Runway two seven right.
Posts: 6,652
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If it was a 747C variant it will already be within the Ageing Airplane Program, which was a Boeing initiative to increase the level of inspections regarding the structural integrity of older aircraft.
The 747 itself is indeed a tough old bird however I would place emphasis on the "old" within that statement.....
The 747 itself is indeed a tough old bird however I would place emphasis on the "old" within that statement.....
Its also the same a/c that ran off the runway in Bangkok in 1999.
#23
I thought it was VH-OJK? It has just come out of maintenance in Australia where it had serious corrosion problems found during an IFE upgrade.
#24
Scooby Regular
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Ascended to the next level
Posts: 7,498
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
For a second I thought it was yet "another" 747 cargo door failure. On closer inspection the door is perfectly intact.
Is there a vent located around there on the underside?
Is there a vent located around there on the underside?
#25
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Runway two seven right.
Posts: 6,652
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'd be astonished it it was as bird strike. Normally there is blood and remnants splattered across the area hit, so I doubt it very much. 30,000ft is just too high.
I'd guess ( and it is just a guess ) it's an issue with the cargo door. Something similar happened to a UA 747 out of LAX in 1989. IIRC Accident Investigation did a programme on it. Same sort of scenario. A "bang/thump" loss of cabin pressure. Rapid decent to a safe landing. I think in that incident debris meant two engines were shutdown. That didn't happen in this case.
And as Jacko's mate knows, I don't possess one a/c registration of any note!
I'd guess ( and it is just a guess ) it's an issue with the cargo door. Something similar happened to a UA 747 out of LAX in 1989. IIRC Accident Investigation did a programme on it. Same sort of scenario. A "bang/thump" loss of cabin pressure. Rapid decent to a safe landing. I think in that incident debris meant two engines were shutdown. That didn't happen in this case.
And as Jacko's mate knows, I don't possess one a/c registration of any note!
#26
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Runway two seven right.
Posts: 6,652
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts