While england burns, Nero fiddles :(
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 12,329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
While england burns, Nero fiddles :(
Nice to know our interests are being looked after
PM in vow to scrap cluster bombs - MSN News UK - news & weather
obviously far more important than
Brown: High oil prices here to stay - MSN News UK - news & weather
So reaching out connects him to us,
Many people would like to reach out and show him how they feel at the mo
Mart
PM in vow to scrap cluster bombs - MSN News UK - news & weather
obviously far more important than
Brown: High oil prices here to stay - MSN News UK - news & weather
So reaching out connects him to us,
Many people would like to reach out and show him how they feel at the mo
Mart
#2
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Sunny BELFAST
Posts: 19,408
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#4
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Epsom
Posts: 5,832
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As for me - UN Peace Prize should go the US Marine Corps
#7
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: .
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Oh that was ridicule was it? Sorry I mistook it for a childish jibe speculating about my sexual preferences presumably because you are unable to come up with anything more intelligent hence my request. Anyway haven't you got school tomorrow?
Trending Topics
#10
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Epsom
Posts: 5,832
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Anyway enough of the love-in, back OT. Brown has his socialist commitments dont you know. Those Unions need to be appeased some how and he's spent all the cash....
#12
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Weston Super Mare, Somerset.
Posts: 14,102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Putting aside the handbags at dawn discussion above cluster bombs are evil vicious things. And yes they are far more important than a couple of pence per litre.
On the oil side I just heard Brown say on the news that bringing in a couple of new North Sea oilfields on stream is going to secure UK supplies. He knows that's bollox and we know that's bollox
dl
On the oil side I just heard Brown say on the news that bringing in a couple of new North Sea oilfields on stream is going to secure UK supplies. He knows that's bollox and we know that's bollox
dl
#15
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: yorkshire (mostly)
Posts: 1,865
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
agree ,my brother served in iraq and kosovo and afgan but have i ever asked him about it no i havnt because im not really bothered at the minute i do care about petrol prices because id rather save the money and spend it on my kids.
o and them cluster bombs they are banned in the uk now and every country cannot stockpile them here except for one country USA what is all that about .
america probably have enough clusterbombs to clusterbomb the entire british isle's
o and them cluster bombs they are banned in the uk now and every country cannot stockpile them here except for one country USA what is all that about .
america probably have enough clusterbombs to clusterbomb the entire british isle's
#17
#18
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I can't speak for the other you choose to insult, but you must be an absolute right wing wacko, if you consider my moderate positions on most subjects to be 'lefty' or 'socialist'
#20
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (34)
You are the first to bemoand the lack of respect in our country, so why do you show such scant respect for some people on here.
I can't speak for the other you choose to insult, but you must be an absolute right wing wacko, if you consider my moderate positions on most subjects to be 'lefty' or 'socialist'
I can't speak for the other you choose to insult, but you must be an absolute right wing wacko, if you consider my moderate positions on most subjects to be 'lefty' or 'socialist'
Your crime is the failure to share his opinion.
#21
I personally dont want to pay taxes to a goverment that uses stuff like that, ok war is nasty but unexploded bomblets and landmines killing and maiming kids is actually quite important. Ok fuel prices affect us all, in real time but I would prefer to see an X5 4.8is driver pass out at the petrol station kiosk than see a photo of a 4 year old kid without any legs.
We have a pretty dire financial situation going on in the Uk at the moment but I dont think worthy initiatives should stop so we can wallow more effectively in the misery of things being more expensive, my kids may have to not get dropped off at friends 15 miles away by car on a whim, but on the plus side I wont see them jump 20 feet in the air and be scattered over a wide area when they play in our garden.
Ok, the yanks arent so bothered but if the Uk and other countries do something then maybe they might get the point, unlikely but at least our conscience is clean.
We have a pretty dire financial situation going on in the Uk at the moment but I dont think worthy initiatives should stop so we can wallow more effectively in the misery of things being more expensive, my kids may have to not get dropped off at friends 15 miles away by car on a whim, but on the plus side I wont see them jump 20 feet in the air and be scattered over a wide area when they play in our garden.
Ok, the yanks arent so bothered but if the Uk and other countries do something then maybe they might get the point, unlikely but at least our conscience is clean.
#22
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: riding the crest of a wave ...
Posts: 46,493
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes
on
12 Posts
Putting aside the handbags at dawn discussion above cluster bombs are evil vicious things. And yes they are far more important than a couple of pence per litre.
On the oil side I just heard Brown say on the news that bringing in a couple of new North Sea oilfields on stream is going to secure UK supplies. He knows that's bollox and we know that's bollox
dl
On the oil side I just heard Brown say on the news that bringing in a couple of new North Sea oilfields on stream is going to secure UK supplies. He knows that's bollox and we know that's bollox
dl
#24
Scooby Regular
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Here, There, Everywhere
Posts: 10,619
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I don't see why we should ban them. In war innocent people get hurt. Look at the Second world war. Did the Germans give a hoot that they might kill an innocent British person? No. Did we with them? No.
I can see the argument for banning them, but TBH, I'd rather we had/used them that someone else using them on us.
Do suicide bombers care if they kill innocent victims? No. What's the difference. We kill innocent people, so do they.
It is a war afterall. Maybe we should settle our differences with a Football match? Actually, with our England team that's probably a bad idea.
I can see the argument for banning them, but TBH, I'd rather we had/used them that someone else using them on us.
Do suicide bombers care if they kill innocent victims? No. What's the difference. We kill innocent people, so do they.
It is a war afterall. Maybe we should settle our differences with a Football match? Actually, with our England team that's probably a bad idea.
#25
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: riding the crest of a wave ...
Posts: 46,493
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes
on
12 Posts
I don't see why we should ban them. In war innocent people get hurt. Look at the Second world war. Did the Germans give a hoot that they might kill an innocent British person? No. Did we with them? No.
I can see the argument for banning them, but TBH, I'd rather we had/used them that someone else using them on us.
Do suicide bombers care if they kill innocent victims? No. What's the difference. We kill innocent people, so do they.
It is a war afterall. Maybe we should settle our differences with a Football match? Actually, with our England team that's probably a bad idea.
I can see the argument for banning them, but TBH, I'd rather we had/used them that someone else using them on us.
Do suicide bombers care if they kill innocent victims? No. What's the difference. We kill innocent people, so do they.
It is a war afterall. Maybe we should settle our differences with a Football match? Actually, with our England team that's probably a bad idea.
Rest of your post isnt worth responding to
#26
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Madchester
Posts: 646
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I don't see why we should ban them. In war innocent people get hurt. Look at the Second world war. Did the Germans give a hoot that they might kill an innocent British person? No. Did we with them? No.
I can see the argument for banning them, but TBH, I'd rather we had/used them that someone else using them on us.
Do suicide bombers care if they kill innocent victims? No. What's the difference. We kill innocent people, so do they.
It is a war afterall. Maybe we should settle our differences with a Football match? Actually, with our England team that's probably a bad idea.
I can see the argument for banning them, but TBH, I'd rather we had/used them that someone else using them on us.
Do suicide bombers care if they kill innocent victims? No. What's the difference. We kill innocent people, so do they.
It is a war afterall. Maybe we should settle our differences with a Football match? Actually, with our England team that's probably a bad idea.
I Agree.
Infact cluster bombs arnt actually designed to kill people. They are designed to blow up runways and millitary bases leaving unexpolded shels behind so that they cant just go and repair them once we have stopped bombing them.
They are not used in built up civilian areas for obvious reasons. So unless the enemy millitants have decided to use the local school kids to clear up the rubble from their base, there should'nt be any 4 year olds with their legs blown off.
SetoN
#27
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Worthing..
Posts: 7,575
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If you were the head of a military junta, who would you use to clear minefields or airstrips with clusters bombs? Trained soldiers or expendable civilians?
You can't measure everything by how it work here.
As for the use of cluster bombs, we have a responsbility to take a lead in things like this and land mines etc.
Ther eis incontravertible evidence that they cause absolute carnage amongst civilians long after the warring factions have cleared off.
Just because some of our enemies might not have any qualms about killing civilians does not mean we should cat the same.
The same applies to toture, the use of chemical weapons all sorts of things that can cause unnecessary harm to civilian populations.
#28
Scooby Regular
Watched something last night showing where some yanks had dumped a load of cluster bombs on a convoy that was trying to flee from them or something. Didn't look like a runway to me....
I'm sure there are other methods of blowing people/runways up that don't have to leave unexploded bombs everywhere.
Forgot to say, I in no way think that what is on the news is always absolutely factual so what I saw may have been something else entirely. I would still say that they aren't only used miles away from civilian inhabited areas though.
I'm sure there are other methods of blowing people/runways up that don't have to leave unexploded bombs everywhere.
Forgot to say, I in no way think that what is on the news is always absolutely factual so what I saw may have been something else entirely. I would still say that they aren't only used miles away from civilian inhabited areas though.
Last edited by Torquemada; 29 May 2008 at 01:53 PM. Reason: Had to add a bit before someone started ranting about not believing what I see on the news, lol
#29
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Madchester
Posts: 646
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well considering child soldiers aren't uncommon in certain parts of the world, that isn't altogether unlikely.
If you were the head of a military junta, who would you use to clear minefields or airstrips with clusters bombs? Trained soldiers or expendable civilians?
You can't measure everything by how it work here.
As for the use of cluster bombs, we have a responsbility to take a lead in things like this and land mines etc.
Ther eis incontravertible evidence that they cause absolute carnage amongst civilians long after the warring factions have cleared off.
Just because some of our enemies might not have any qualms about killing civilians does not mean we should cat the same.
The same applies to toture, the use of chemical weapons all sorts of things that can cause unnecessary harm to civilian populations.
If you were the head of a military junta, who would you use to clear minefields or airstrips with clusters bombs? Trained soldiers or expendable civilians?
You can't measure everything by how it work here.
As for the use of cluster bombs, we have a responsbility to take a lead in things like this and land mines etc.
Ther eis incontravertible evidence that they cause absolute carnage amongst civilians long after the warring factions have cleared off.
Just because some of our enemies might not have any qualms about killing civilians does not mean we should cat the same.
The same applies to toture, the use of chemical weapons all sorts of things that can cause unnecessary harm to civilian populations.