Notices
Non Scooby Related Anything Non-Scooby related

RAF Tornado navigator ejected whilst upside down

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 15 November 2007, 01:33 PM
  #1  
Sonic'
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Sonic''s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Couch Spud
Posts: 9,277
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RAF Tornado navigator ejected whilst upside down

BBC NEWS | England | Norfolk | Probe into navigator death begins

Seems a little odd, no mention of potential suicide, but does seem a bizarre accident
Old 15 November 2007, 01:39 PM
  #2  
Vampire
Scooby Regular
 
Vampire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Have they said if the seat actually ejected or just fell out? I remember someone was killed a few years back after a seat fell from a (privately owned ex-RAF) Jet Provost which rolled inverted.

Pretty sad either way.
Old 15 November 2007, 01:40 PM
  #3  
Sonic'
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Sonic''s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Couch Spud
Posts: 9,277
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

They have said it 'ejected' but haven't said whether it was a fault or deliberate

It might just have been really bad timing

Apparently the crew were BAE Civilians
Old 15 November 2007, 01:40 PM
  #4  
Snazy
Scooby Regular
 
Snazy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: S.E London
Posts: 13,654
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Civilian crew too
Old 15 November 2007, 01:42 PM
  #5  
Sbradley
Scooby Regular
 
Sbradley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Croydon - returned to democracy! Yay!!
Posts: 3,682
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'll avoid being pedantic and pointing out that the poor guy was a civilian contractor, not RAF... (OK, you beat me to it anyway)

Edited to add that the terms used to rather strongly imply an ejection rather than a seat falling out. Though I'll not discount anything just yet...

I can think of a couple of scenarios:

Inexperienced guy in the back, pilot pulls a couple of over enthusiastic moves, nav freaks out and pulls the handle thinking that the aircraft has departed controlled flight.

Aircraft does depart controlled flight. Pilot recovers but nav has already gone.

Seat malfunction (almost unheard of and rarer still giving an uncommanded ejection).

New Martin Baker seats are supposed to be good for an inverted ejection at, I believe, 500', so the biggest question I'd be asking is what was a Tornado doing inverted over Sandringham at below that height?

SB

PS Generally if you're outside the seat envelope on a modern seat then you may as well go anyway as you're waaaaaay beyond recovering the aircraft...

Last edited by Sbradley; 15 November 2007 at 01:44 PM. Reason: Caveats
Old 15 November 2007, 01:49 PM
  #6  
billythekid
Scooby Regular
 
billythekid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,574
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I reckon it was an accidental ejection, has happened before - more than once.
Old 15 November 2007, 01:52 PM
  #7  
Snazy
Scooby Regular
 
Snazy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: S.E London
Posts: 13,654
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Sbradley
I'll avoid being pedantic and pointing out that the poor guy was a civilian contractor, not RAF... (OK, you beat me to it anyway)

Edited to add that the terms used to rather strongly imply an ejection rather than a seat falling out. Though I'll not discount anything just yet...

I can think of a couple of scenarios:

Inexperienced guy in the back, pilot pulls a couple of over enthusiastic moves, nav freaks out and pulls the handle thinking that the aircraft has departed controlled flight.

Aircraft does depart controlled flight. Pilot recovers but nav has already gone.

Seat malfunction (almost unheard of and rarer still giving an uncommanded ejection).

New Martin Baker seats are supposed to be good for an inverted ejection at, I believe, 500', so the biggest question I'd be asking is what was a Tornado doing inverted over Sandringham at below that height?

SB

PS Generally if you're outside the seat envelope on a modern seat then you may as well go anyway as you're waaaaaay beyond recovering the aircraft...
all sound reasonable to me.
Old 15 November 2007, 02:05 PM
  #8  
PaulC72
Scooby Regular
 
PaulC72's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: RIP Tam.
Posts: 5,108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Shame either way, I would have thought there was a system that stopped ejection happening when the plane was upside down?
Old 15 November 2007, 02:07 PM
  #9  
Banality
BANNED
 
Banality's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Living in the land of milk and honey, wouldn't you like to as well?
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PaulC72
Shame either way, I would have thought there was a system that stopped ejection happening when the plane was upside down?
Sometimes you might need to eject when the craft is inverted though so a system like that wouldn't be desireable.
Old 15 November 2007, 02:33 PM
  #10  
WRX_Dazza
Scooby Regular
 
WRX_Dazza's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Going further than the station and back !!! ZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzz
Posts: 11,097
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i saw a tornado in Norfolk giving it some throttle on wednesday afternoon about 3.00pm on my way back home...

hope it wasn't the same plane !!!

tragic news ....
Old 15 November 2007, 02:38 PM
  #11  
davegtt
Scooby Senior
 
davegtt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Next door to the WiFi connection
Posts: 16,293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by WRX_Dazza
i saw a tornado in Norfolk giving it some throttle on wednesday afternoon about 3.00pm on my way back home...

hope it wasn't the same plane !!!

tragic news ....
No offence but so what if it was the same plane? Not like you knew the pilot or anything, if it wasnt that plane it was certainly another plane. Already happened.

Sorry it just seemed like a silly comment to make.
Old 15 November 2007, 02:50 PM
  #12  
Brendan Hughes
Scooby Regular
 
Brendan Hughes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: same time, different place
Posts: 11,313
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

A bad case of premature ejection.
Old 15 November 2007, 02:54 PM
  #13  
DCI Gene Hunt
Scooby Senior
 
DCI Gene Hunt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: RIP - Tam the bam & Andy the Jock
Posts: 14,333
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

All BAES aircrew are either ex RAF aircrew or on secondment from the RAF, and are regularly trained (on a monthly basis) in aircraft emergencies. So the fact they were civilian is neither here nor there
Old 15 November 2007, 03:53 PM
  #14  
WRX_Dazza
Scooby Regular
 
WRX_Dazza's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Going further than the station and back !!! ZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzz
Posts: 11,097
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by davegtt
No offence but so what if it was the same plane? Not like you knew the pilot or anything, if it wasnt that plane it was certainly another plane. Already happened.

Sorry it just seemed like a silly comment to make.


so you wouldn't think any different if you saw the actual plane itself??

it just got me thinking thats all.

look at your own fecking comment for sillyness

troll somewhere else
Old 15 November 2007, 04:06 PM
  #15  
davegtt
Scooby Senior
 
davegtt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Next door to the WiFi connection
Posts: 16,293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

lol no, Id just think wow, I saw that not long before it happened. Not like it was something that happened on a train you would normally have been on or anything and you had a lucky escape or something, oh sod it, you know what I meant anyway.
Old 15 November 2007, 06:01 PM
  #16  
Holy Ghost
Scooby Regular
 
Holy Ghost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,615
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PaulC72
Shame either way, I would have thought there was a system that stopped ejection happening when the plane was upside down?

**

seats now are all-aspect. upside down, stationary, you name it. you never know when the lethal MOD bean counters will try and get you.
Old 15 November 2007, 06:02 PM
  #17  
andythejock01wrx
Scooby Regular
 
andythejock01wrx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Edinburgh (ish)
Posts: 8,089
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Holy Ghost
**

seats now are all-aspect. upside down, stationary, you name it. you never know when the lethal MOD bean counters will try and get you.
Holy, how come your posts start with a couple of asterix's ? (not of the "Gaul" type !)
Old 15 November 2007, 06:37 PM
  #18  
Prasius
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Prasius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,914
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Living in Norfolk its just been on the local news.

Canopy had gone, seat had gone, and there was damage to the tailplane. From what was said it doesn't sound as if the seat initiated, it simply wasn't bolted in place, so when the aircraft inverted, the seat dropped through the canopy and hit the tail of the aircraft on the way out.

Someone is going to be in a world of ****.
Old 15 November 2007, 07:19 PM
  #19  
Brit_in_Japan
Scooby Regular
 
Brit_in_Japan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: No longer Japan !
Posts: 1,742
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

As someone who has experience of the Martin Baker Mk10A in Tornados, all I can tell you is that without the facts, which certainly won't be released whilst an Air Accident Investigation is taking place (and may not be subsequently), it's all speculation.

It could have been a normal ejection sequence initiated in error, or it could have been an un-commanded ejection which is rare but not unknown.

My condolences to the family of the BAe flight crew concerned.
Old 15 November 2007, 07:39 PM
  #20  
Sbradley
Scooby Regular
 
Sbradley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Croydon - returned to democracy! Yay!!
Posts: 3,682
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Brit_in_Japan
As someone who has experience of the Martin Baker Mk10A in Tornados, all I can tell you is that without the facts, which certainly won't be released whilst an Air Accident Investigation is taking place (and may not be subsequently), it's all speculation.

It could have been a normal ejection sequence initiated in error, or it could have been an un-commanded ejection which is rare but not unknown.

My condolences to the family of the BAe flight crew concerned.
Oi! This is Scoobynet!

Reasonable, informed posts suggesting that pure speculation is pointless and nailing the important issue are not appropriate here...

SB

Old 15 November 2007, 09:02 PM
  #21  
Brit_in_Japan
Scooby Regular
 
Brit_in_Japan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: No longer Japan !
Posts: 1,742
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'm sorry, I've made myself look stupid there !
Old 15 November 2007, 09:06 PM
  #22  
Sonic'
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Sonic''s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Couch Spud
Posts: 9,277
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Brit_in_Japan
I'm sorry, I've made myself look stupid there !
Thats ok, we all do it from time to time, I mean just look at my plastered wall thread, thats me a numptie for a bit now
Old 15 November 2007, 10:00 PM
  #23  
The Snug Rhino
Scooby Regular
 
The Snug Rhino's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: I have ad blocked my rep - so dont waste your time!
Posts: 1,548
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Sbradley
the biggest question I'd be asking is what was a Tornado doing inverted over Sandringham at below that height?
Taking a Polaroid?
Old 15 November 2007, 10:17 PM
  #24  
jjones
Scooby Regular
 
jjones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Posts: 4,410
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by The Snug Rhino
Taking a Polaroid?
Old 16 November 2007, 08:36 AM
  #25  
MikeCardiff
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
MikeCardiff's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Cardiff
Posts: 2,266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Probably inverted because the pilot was playing around - still a terrible accident though - you dont expect to go up for a nice fun fly around and end up with the police having to tell your wife and kids you're dead.

On a similar note - I live near the airport, and for a couple of days we had the new Typhoon taking off from there - you could tell it was coming because it went up vertically for a couple of miles then vanished - never heard so much noise from a jet ( most planes taking off over our direction are smaller 2 engine commercial jets going off on holiday ) but looked awesome.

Apparently there was no good reason for the pilot to take off like that, they just do it because they can .
Old 16 November 2007, 08:53 AM
  #26  
DCI Gene Hunt
Scooby Senior
 
DCI Gene Hunt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: RIP - Tam the bam & Andy the Jock
Posts: 14,333
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MikeCardiff
Probably inverted because the pilot was playing around - still a terrible accident though - you dont expect to go up for a nice fun fly around and end up with the police having to tell your wife and kids you're dead.

On a similar note - I live near the airport, and for a couple of days we had the new Typhoon taking off from there - you could tell it was coming because it went up vertically for a couple of miles then vanished - never heard so much noise from a jet ( most planes taking off over our direction are smaller 2 engine commercial jets going off on holiday ) but looked awesome.

Apparently there was no good reason for the pilot to take off like that, they just do it because they can .
They're designed to take off at that angle, if they took off at anything less they'd go supersonic...
Old 16 November 2007, 10:26 AM
  #27  
Leslie
Scooby Regular
 
Leslie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 39,877
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

As was stated, all this is pure conjecture ane ther is no way any of us can why it happened. I am sorry for the bloke concerned.

As I understand it, it is possible for the seat to be steered by the rocket system to a better angle if operated while inverted.

Les
Old 16 November 2007, 10:31 AM
  #28  
BlkKnight
Scooby Regular
 
BlkKnight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: High Wycombe
Posts: 3,763
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

True, I think altitude & relative speed are important factors though.
Old 16 November 2007, 12:44 PM
  #29  
J4CKO
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
J4CKO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 19,384
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Tragic.

You never think of non millitary types flying these kids of planes, apart from the poor chap falling out it sounds like a superb job.

My dad used to work on the buses as a pump fitter and they used to take the buses out on test, same kind of thing but the pilots didnt get the joy of driving towards a bus stop slowing down and not stopping.
Old 16 November 2007, 12:54 PM
  #30  
rkbycrof
Scooby Regular
 
rkbycrof's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Immingham, NE Lincs
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Sbradley
New Martin Baker seats are supposed to be good for an inverted ejection at, I believe, 500', so the biggest question I'd be asking is what was a Tornado doing inverted over Sandringham at below that height?
I thought I'd heard that this happened at around 5000 feet?

I think I read somewhere that there was significant damage to the tail fin, does this suggest the rocket hadn't fired or been fired?

Terrible tragedy whatever the circumstances....


Quick Reply: RAF Tornado navigator ejected whilst upside down



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:38 PM.