Police requesting DNA.........what rights?
#1
Police requesting DNA.........what rights?
I don't want to go into the why's and wherefores, but a friend, (no, NOT me), has had the coppers round requesting his DNA for an ongoing investigation.
He wanted to know how long they keep it for, why, and if he had the right to refuse. The copper didn't know, so went away to find out and is back tonight, apparently.
Any lawyers out there advise?
TIA, Alcazar
He wanted to know how long they keep it for, why, and if he had the right to refuse. The copper didn't know, so went away to find out and is back tonight, apparently.
Any lawyers out there advise?
TIA, Alcazar
#2
Scooby Regular
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Here, There, Everywhere
Posts: 10,619
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Seriously, I'd tell them to go **** themselves. Or just not answer the door.
They can't make you give a DNA sample unless you are convicted of something, or you give your permission.
If it's a good looking WPC, suggest giving a sperm sample.
They can't make you give a DNA sample unless you are convicted of something, or you give your permission.
If it's a good looking WPC, suggest giving a sperm sample.
#4
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Never do names esp. Joey, spaz or Mong
Posts: 39,688
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Get hold of your partners drool and rub it around your mouth when you hear the door bell and then let them swab you.
Mine came back pregnant
Mine came back pregnant
#5
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 12,304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
One way or another he's going end up on the DNA database and short of a future givernment scrapping it, he'll be on it for all time.
#7
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Logged Out
Posts: 10,221
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Trending Topics
#8
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Markyate.Imprezas owned:-wrx-sti5typeR-p1-uk22b-modded my00. Amongst others!
Posts: 8,541
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#10
But try telling that to the young lad who was convicted of something because they found his DNA on a letter...........he just HAPPENED to have posted one in the same box, but HIS DNA was on record, so............another crime cleared up
Alcazar
#12
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Oo'p Norf
Posts: 873
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If he's not suspected of anything and they're just doing an area trawl of DNA samples, I would tell them to poke off. They're not going to arrest him just so they can get his prints and DNA sample.. that is unless he is a suspect.
#14
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: In a Galaxy far, far away....
Posts: 604
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yes they can! Can take your DNA if you have been arrested - dont have to be convicted. And it's kept for ever......
#15
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Oo'p Norf
Posts: 873
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yep but they've got to arrest you for something first, or take you in for a caution. They're not going to do that as a means to an end just to get your DNA sample. I mean they'd have to have a good reason to arrest you, otherwise that'd open a huge can of worms with people claiming for false arrest left, right and centre.
#16
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: GC8 Enthusiast - Scumball3000 Team 69
Posts: 2,002
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I don't want to go into the why's and wherefores, but a friend, (no, NOT me), has had the coppers round requesting his DNA for an ongoing investigation.
He wanted to know how long they keep it for, why, and if he had the right to refuse. The copper didn't know, so went away to find out and is back tonight, apparently.
Any lawyers out there advise?
TIA, Alcazar
He wanted to know how long they keep it for, why, and if he had the right to refuse. The copper didn't know, so went away to find out and is back tonight, apparently.
Any lawyers out there advise?
TIA, Alcazar
Its a brave new world.....
#17
Scooby Regular
#18
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Surrey/London borders.
Posts: 8,300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You don't have to give it. Simple.
It can only be taken if arrested.
But refusing can give grounds to be arrested in certain cases.
Depends why they want it.
It can only be taken if arrested.
But refusing can give grounds to be arrested in certain cases.
Depends why they want it.
#19
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: I've joined the Focus family
Posts: 7,623
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Alcazar, I appreciate you won't go into specifics, but the DNA maybe required for elimination purposes. Has your 'friend' been the victim of crime recently??
#20
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
Link?
DNA on letters is taken from the sticky bit under the flap. It's rather difficult to see how it could have got there by cross-contamination (true cross contamination, as opposed to the type imagined by defence lawyers and anti-NDNABP people, is actually pretty rare). A far more convincing explanation is that the person in question licked the sticky bit of the letter. If the DNA got there by cross-contamination you'd expect a mix of multiple donors, not just a single clean DNA hit. Like the kind you'd get if they were guilty as charged.
But in answer to the original question, no, he doesn't have to provide, but if he does his profile will stay on the DB for ever.
M
#21
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Surrey/London borders.
Posts: 8,300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
No it won't.
It will be destroyed if he is giving it voluntarily to eliminate him/her.
It's only kept forever if arrested for a recordable offence.
It will be destroyed if he is giving it voluntarily to eliminate him/her.
It's only kept forever if arrested for a recordable offence.
#23
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Markyate.Imprezas owned:-wrx-sti5typeR-p1-uk22b-modded my00. Amongst others!
Posts: 8,541
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I was under the impression that any DNA collected, including elimination DNA, was kept on the database.
#24
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 12,304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The expansion of the database in 2001 to allow for retention of samples even after charges are dropped or an acquittal is obtained, has led to the profiles of 24,000 innocent children and teenagers being kept on the ‘criminal database’. The Sunday Times asserts that some of these children may have simply been victims of or witnesses to an incident
UK National DNA Database retains innocent children's DNA
UK National DNA Database retains innocent children's DNA
#25
Since our leaders want to build a complete database on us all for their own reasons, I would not trust them to destroy any DNA sample they took for whatever reason.
You seem to have a right lot of coppers round your way Alcazar. They appear to be a bit "previous" in all respects. Trouble is they could even use the prevention of terrorism act to arrest him as they did with that elderly man who had the temerity to criticise that creepy politician at their conference with one word for goodness sake!
Difficult to know what to do but I would definitely insist on knowing their reason for wanting the sample.
Les
You seem to have a right lot of coppers round your way Alcazar. They appear to be a bit "previous" in all respects. Trouble is they could even use the prevention of terrorism act to arrest him as they did with that elderly man who had the temerity to criticise that creepy politician at their conference with one word for goodness sake!
Difficult to know what to do but I would definitely insist on knowing their reason for wanting the sample.
Les
#26
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Tellins, Home of Super Leagues finest, and where a "split" is not all it seems.
Posts: 5,504
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
'kin 'ell! The mass paranoia on here leads me to think that 99% of the people on here were raised on LSD from their mums bussoms!
I would happily walk into a police station today and give a DNA sample without a second thought.
Stories of stitch ups arent new and go back to the before DNA were even letters in the alphabet and so add nothing to this debate... If you dont want to provide a sample (when not having been arrested) as a matter of principal then that should be up to you, but beyond your moral beliefs there is no sound reason why you shouldnt be itching to get that swab in your gob.
I would happily walk into a police station today and give a DNA sample without a second thought.
Stories of stitch ups arent new and go back to the before DNA were even letters in the alphabet and so add nothing to this debate... If you dont want to provide a sample (when not having been arrested) as a matter of principal then that should be up to you, but beyond your moral beliefs there is no sound reason why you shouldnt be itching to get that swab in your gob.
Last edited by Abdabz; 19 July 2007 at 11:32 AM.
#29
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 12,304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
DNA can be taken from those arrested, and retained permanently even if they're not charged or found guilty, and the collection of scene of crime samples is also a valuable mining area. In the case of arrests, you could see situations where large numbers of demonstrators are arrested then released without charge (this happens fairly often), but have their DNA added to the database anyway
Report warns of dangers of UK's DNA database | The Register
Report warns of dangers of UK's DNA database | The Register
#30
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Surrey/London borders.
Posts: 8,300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It's not............
The quote you have presented relates to people who have been arrested and then not found guilty, or never charged. Their DNA was taken as a matter of course after arrest, not to eliminate them, and will stay on the file.
People who are requested to give their DNA but not arrested have their DNA destroyed once comparison has been made and they are eliminated.
The quote you have presented relates to people who have been arrested and then not found guilty, or never charged. Their DNA was taken as a matter of course after arrest, not to eliminate them, and will stay on the file.
People who are requested to give their DNA but not arrested have their DNA destroyed once comparison has been made and they are eliminated.
Last edited by fatherpierre; 19 July 2007 at 12:55 PM.