Police chief's 'Orwellian' fears
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Disco, Disco!
Posts: 21,825
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Police chief's 'Orwellian' fears
BBC NEWS | UK | Police chief's 'Orwellian' fears
CCTV seems to be the answer to this governments fears and the Police have embraced it with open arms, it should be part of the solution not the basis for policing in the UK!
CCTV seems to be the answer to this governments fears and the Police have embraced it with open arms, it should be part of the solution not the basis for policing in the UK!
#3
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Disco, Disco!
Posts: 21,825
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Too true,
I feel that the seniorpolice are just waking up to this and that everyday people are just sick of the injustices they see every day. The police have lost a lot of public support because of inicitives imposed on them by government - badly thought out targets, speeding being the most important crime, etc.
Sadly, a few real senior cops, not the carreer cops we seem to have should have stood up and been counted instead of just rubber stamping stupid, ill thought out ideas and knee jerk reactions and massaging the politicians egos.
We are the ones suffering due to this...
I feel that the seniorpolice are just waking up to this and that everyday people are just sick of the injustices they see every day. The police have lost a lot of public support because of inicitives imposed on them by government - badly thought out targets, speeding being the most important crime, etc.
Sadly, a few real senior cops, not the carreer cops we seem to have should have stood up and been counted instead of just rubber stamping stupid, ill thought out ideas and knee jerk reactions and massaging the politicians egos.
We are the ones suffering due to this...
#7
My point being is that this is being talked about on another thread.
Its like having two threads going about the same thing..
Its like me starting a thread now entitled "Police Chiefs CCTV worries"
Its like having two threads going about the same thing..
Its like me starting a thread now entitled "Police Chiefs CCTV worries"
Trending Topics
#8
BBC NEWS | UK | Police chief's 'Orwellian' fears
CCTV seems to be the answer to this governments fears and the Police have embraced it with open arms, it should be part of the solution not the basis for policing in the UK!
CCTV seems to be the answer to this governments fears and the Police have embraced it with open arms, it should be part of the solution not the basis for policing in the UK!
#9
But it’s not the basis of policing – it’s just another tool which we use. Similar to DNA and fingerprints
Remember it was the local council which installs the CCTV and the vast majority of the public are in favour – so is it not the council doing what the public want…?
Remember it was the local council which installs the CCTV and the vast majority of the public are in favour – so is it not the council doing what the public want…?
#10
I getting a feeling of deja vu...
#12
Les
#13
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Runway two seven right.
Posts: 6,652
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Because the crime wasn't captured on CCTV Les. Without it, the police are unable to proceed with an investigation. I suggest you petition your council for wider CCTV coverage. You'll be Ok then.
#16
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Disco, Disco!
Posts: 21,825
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hi Felix
How will the police know if there is any DNA or fingerprint evidence without checking the car, if the scum took things from inside the car then maybe they touched the interior or left hairs or cut themselves, etc.
Without checking how can anyone come to that conclusion!?!
#17
Guest
Posts: n/a
Hi Felix
How will the police know if there is any DNA or fingerprint evidence without checking the car, if the scum took things from inside the car then maybe they touched the interior or left hairs or cut themselves, etc.
Without checking how can anyone come to that conclusion!?!
How will the police know if there is any DNA or fingerprint evidence without checking the car, if the scum took things from inside the car then maybe they touched the interior or left hairs or cut themselves, etc.
Without checking how can anyone come to that conclusion!?!
Dave
#18
A car widow shatters on impact, so no chance of anyone cutting themselves and hence no blood. Also apart from the driver’s mirror, inside of the cowling and the inside of the glass – there are no surfaces to get any fingerprints
If there are no witnesses, no CCTV, no items left at the scene, no suspects – why do you need a police officer to attend.
If there are no witnesses, no CCTV, no items left at the scene, no suspects – why do you need a police officer to attend.
#19
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Disco, Disco!
Posts: 21,825
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A car widow shatters on impact, so no chance of anyone cutting themselves and hence no blood. Also apart from the driver’s mirror, inside of the cowling and the inside of the glass – there are no surfaces to get any fingerprints
If there are no witnesses, no CCTV, no items left at the scene, no suspects – why do you need a police officer to attend.
If there are no witnesses, no CCTV, no items left at the scene, no suspects – why do you need a police officer to attend.
LOL!
FFS Felix you just have to be joking, this is just the attitude that winds people up, it is the WGAF attitude that does not get anyone anywhere in this day and age and the police are not exempt either, far from it!
How can you know, 100% for sure there is not any forsensic evidence without attending. Assuption is the mother of all ****-ups so do not assume!
To say otherwise without seeing the scene is arrogant, short sighted and foolhardy!
Last edited by The Zohan; 22 May 2007 at 04:04 PM.
#20
Les
#21
Policing at its best.....| the Daily Mail
#22
LOL!
FFS Felix you just have to be joking, this is just the attitude that winds people up, it is the WGAF attitude that does not get anyone anywhere in this day and age and the police are not exempt either, far from it!
How can you know, 100% for sure there is not any forsensic evidence without attending. Assuption is the mother of all ****-ups so do not assume!
To say otherwise without seeing the scene is arrogant, short sighted and foolhardy!
FFS Felix you just have to be joking, this is just the attitude that winds people up, it is the WGAF attitude that does not get anyone anywhere in this day and age and the police are not exempt either, far from it!
How can you know, 100% for sure there is not any forsensic evidence without attending. Assuption is the mother of all ****-ups so do not assume!
To say otherwise without seeing the scene is arrogant, short sighted and foolhardy!
Experience and a few questions asked when you phoned, would establish the need for SOCO. Fingerprint lifts can only be gained from completely flat surfaces.
The only other method to gain partial lifts from un-even surfaces is to pass a haze of effectively ‘super-glue’ over the item and then chemically treat it. This would destroy your car completely and the chance of getting a recognisable lift is negligible.
It would also take days to complete, so Alcazar’s son who was assaulted will have to wait even longer to have his photos done.
I believe Roy Whiting’s van was taken to bits and they couldn’t find a recognisable fingerprint – and he was driving the thing.
#23
Guest
Posts: n/a
As has been said countless times and by countless people, the trust in the police is now at rock bottom - and all you do is trot out party lines that do nowt to raise that trust!
Well done, Felix.
Dave
#25
OK, we will attend every job - but don’t complain if yours is held on a queue for days. You might have to leave you car untouched for a week/month to allow SOCO to view it- - and when they do, they might have to take chunks of your car away which you won’t get back.
To show we are not target driven, we will answer every call as it comes in. So Mrs Miggens having her garden gnome stolen by “…..it must be that family in the next street, I haven’t seen anything, but it must be them….” will be dealt with first over a house burglary.
To show we are not target driven, we will answer every call as it comes in. So Mrs Miggens having her garden gnome stolen by “…..it must be that family in the next street, I haven’t seen anything, but it must be them….” will be dealt with first over a house burglary.
#26
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Disco, Disco!
Posts: 21,825
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
OK, we will attend every job - but don’t complain if yours is held on a queue for days. You might have to leave you car untouched for a week/month to allow SOCO to view it- - and when they do, they might have to take chunks of your car away which you won’t get back.
To show we are not target driven, we will answer every call as it comes in. So Mrs Miggens having her garden gnome stolen by “…..it must be that family in the next street, I haven’t seen anything, but it must be them….” will be dealt with first over a house burglary.
To show we are not target driven, we will answer every call as it comes in. So Mrs Miggens having her garden gnome stolen by “…..it must be that family in the next street, I haven’t seen anything, but it must be them….” will be dealt with first over a house burglary.
Also if the scum know that there is not follow up then what is to stop them, no much.
This can only lead (in most cases) to more of the same crimes and more crime to deal with making things worse and so on, you have to break the cycle. If it means we need more socco's or cops then so be it but your way the criminals win!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Steve Prockter
ScoobyNet General
51
07 March 2000 09:50 PM