Notices
Non Scooby Related Anything Non-Scooby related

30m to be spent enforcing smoking ban Tough on smoking...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 15 February 2007, 08:43 AM
  #1  
The Zohan
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
The Zohan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Disco, Disco!
Posts: 21,825
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Unhappy 30m to be spent enforcing smoking ban Tough on smoking...

....tough on the causes of smoking.

(On R5 Live news this morning)

Govenment training 2000 officers to enforce the ban at a cost of 30m. Some of these oficers will go undercover - FFS! is it April 01 already?

now that is really getting at the root of all evil and wil reduce crime to alomst nil.

Well done NL - Good and well thought out use of public money, especially when you see a third teenager shot dead in his home in London!

Last edited by The Zohan; 15 February 2007 at 08:49 AM.
Old 15 February 2007, 09:01 AM
  #2  
druddle
Scooby Regular
 
druddle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Berkshire
Posts: 5,528
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Like its the governments fault that some stupid wannabe schoolboy gangsters want to kill each other......

Dave
Old 15 February 2007, 09:05 AM
  #3  
SJ_Skyline
Scooby Senior
 
SJ_Skyline's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Limbo
Posts: 21,922
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Money well spent... what else will these 2000 officers be empowered to spy on? and more importantly, how much will they cost annually after the £30M has been spent training them?
Old 15 February 2007, 09:16 AM
  #4  
The Zohan
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
The Zohan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Disco, Disco!
Posts: 21,825
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by druddle
Like its the governments fault that some stupid wannabe schoolboy gangsters want to kill each other......

Dave
not saying it is, this is about priorities and good judicious use of public funds

These srtupid wannabe kids still leave families devastated because of their immature attitudes or even from a financial POV think of the expence and police time in investigating this sort of crime

Last edited by The Zohan; 15 February 2007 at 09:19 AM.
Old 15 February 2007, 09:24 AM
  #5  
David Lock
Scooby Regular
 
David Lock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Weston Super Mare, Somerset.
Posts: 14,102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

They'll probably be allowed to search kids for a pack of puffs but if they find a gun in their pocket they'll have to keep quiet about it
Old 15 February 2007, 09:29 AM
  #6  
Seamaster
BANNED
 
Seamaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 659
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

great .Its about time smokers got some grief for all the grief they have caused us none smokers.

I will be the first to call the feds if I see someone breaking the law about it.

"FREE THE LUNGS"
Old 15 February 2007, 10:44 AM
  #7  
Trout
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Trout's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 15,271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Paul Habgood
....tough on the causes of smoking.

(On R5 Live news this morning)

Govenment training 2000 officers to enforce the ban at a cost of 30m. Some of these oficers will go undercover - FFS! is it April 01 already?

now that is really getting at the root of all evil and wil reduce crime to alomst nil.

Well done NL - Good and well thought out use of public money, especially when you see a third teenager shot dead in his home in London!
Given the cost of treating smoking related diseases there is probably a very strong cost benefit from legislating the reduction of smoking opportunities and ultimately the reduction in smoking.

The cost of treating smoking related cancer and disease is a phenomally high financial burden on the NHS - £30m is a drop in the ocean.

It's called performance managed healthcare - I guess this is why some people are in Government and you aren't

Rannoch
Old 15 February 2007, 10:48 AM
  #8  
Leslie
Scooby Regular
 
Leslie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 39,877
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Some of us could not bear the thought of having to be so dishonest to be in a government like this one.

Les
Old 15 February 2007, 10:58 AM
  #9  
Luan Pra bang
Scooby Regular
 
Luan Pra bang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Rannoch
Given the cost of treating smoking related diseases there is probably a very strong cost benefit from legislating the reduction of smoking opportunities and ultimately the reduction in smoking.

The cost of treating smoking related cancer and disease is a phenomally high financial burden on the NHS - £30m is a drop in the ocean.

It's called performance managed healthcare - I guess this is why some people are in Government and you aren't

Rannoch
We both know that the tax benefit to smoking pays for the cost of treating smoking related diseases 10 times over.
Old 15 February 2007, 11:06 AM
  #10  
KiwiGTI
Scooby Regular
 
KiwiGTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,631
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Just think it's a sad comment on Britain today and the state of society that they have to employ 2000 people to act as narcs to tell and prosecute fellow citizens, even before the ban has had a chance to work and be self-policed.

Pathetic. (And I'm a non-smoker)
Old 15 February 2007, 11:19 AM
  #11  
Shark Man
Scooby Regular
 
Shark Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Ascended to the next level
Posts: 7,498
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'm waiting for Gatso to manufacture a smoke detector that takes your picture when it senses that your smoking in a public building.

This is why they want a barcode stamped on your forehead for ID purposes.....
Old 15 February 2007, 11:46 AM
  #12  
SiPie
Scooby Regular
 
SiPie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Scotland
Posts: 7,249
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

As mentioned in the other thread...the ban will more or less police itself.

Load of fuss about nothing really, has caused little grief up here as most people have enough common sense to appreciate the reasoning behind the ban etc

Enjoy the fresh air




PS Downside = If you happen to live directly above a busy pub or club then prepare for no sleep till after the pub shuts (although some pub landlords up here are now restricting areas outside where people pcan and can't go to to smoke after receiving complaints from residents living above etc...) and plenty of fights kicking off in your street
Old 15 February 2007, 11:51 AM
  #13  
D1CCY
Scooby Regular
 
D1CCY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: East Yorkshire
Posts: 1,966
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'm anti smoking but this is typical NL. Create new rules/regulations and then get out the big stick to enforce.
Old 15 February 2007, 11:59 AM
  #14  
MJW
Scooby Senior
 
MJW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: West Yorks.
Posts: 4,130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Rannoch
Given the cost of treating smoking related diseases there is probably a very strong cost benefit from legislating the reduction of smoking opportunities and ultimately the reduction in smoking.
Yep well said - now all that needs to be done is the same treatment for all the other ***-ends who deliberately put themselves and others at risk like rugby players, sky divers, mountain bikers and Robbie Williams.
Old 15 February 2007, 12:27 PM
  #15  
The Zohan
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
The Zohan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Disco, Disco!
Posts: 21,825
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Rannoch
Given the cost of treating smoking related diseases there is probably a very strong cost benefit from legislating the reduction of smoking opportunities and ultimately the reduction in smoking.

The cost of treating smoking related cancer and disease is a phenomally high financial burden on the NHS - £30m is a drop in the ocean.

It's called performance managed healthcare - I guess this is why some people are in Government and you aren't

Rannoch


'Performanced managed healthcare' indeed, not NL's latest hard-on for change, 'sticking plaster management' more like


Hmm,

I have no asperations to be in government and having done a lot of work fo the NHS and the govenrment over the years i have a good insight into what goes on and io have sen money wasted by them both first hand.

I keep hearing about how much smokers take out f the NHS, how about the £4+ per packet that goes in tax, is spent on the NHS in that case?

I wonder how much is the cost of treating smoking related illnes. Does anyone have any real ststistics on this?

I an all for stopping smoking in public and inflicting it on other people.

I believe this will be prety much self regulating and not require this sort of expendature.

I do think 30m could be better spent than on smoking police - real; police would be a start!

If we are going to ban smoking and drive it from the face of the country because it is bad for us, bad for other people who do not smoke and cost the NHS millions then what about banning drinking of alcohol for exaclty the same reasons.

Just as valid

It will never happen

Last edited by The Zohan; 15 February 2007 at 12:31 PM.
Old 15 February 2007, 12:34 PM
  #16  
Paul3446
Scooby Regular
 
Paul3446's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 3,236
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Roll on July 1st.

I can't wait to see sad little groups of smokers huddled on street corners taking a furtive drag to satisfy their pathetic cravings, while non-smokers are having a great time in the pub.

I wonder if that is the cool image they had in mind when they took up the habit.
Old 15 February 2007, 12:39 PM
  #17  
SJ_Skyline
Scooby Senior
 
SJ_Skyline's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Limbo
Posts: 21,922
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I've had a rethink - getting paid to sit in the pub all day and maybe issue a few on the spot fines? Where do I sign up?
Old 15 February 2007, 12:40 PM
  #18  
johnfelstead
Scooby Regular
Support Scoobynet!
 
johnfelstead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Posts: 11,439
Received 53 Likes on 30 Posts
Default

Gets 2000 more votes on the payrole, whilst ramping up the surveylance society. Job Done for NL yet again.
Old 15 February 2007, 12:41 PM
  #19  
SiPie
Scooby Regular
 
SiPie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Scotland
Posts: 7,249
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I believe this will be prety much self regulating and not require this sort of expendature.
It will
Old 15 February 2007, 03:43 PM
  #20  
Norman D. Landing
Scooby Regular
 
Norman D. Landing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 892
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Well from ash's own website (ash.org.uk) "The Treasury earned £8,000 Million in revenue from tobacco duties for the financial year 2005-2006 (EXCLUDING VAT)"

Also "About 80% of the price of a packet of cigarrettes consists of taxation".

Go on, how much does the NHS cost (for smoking related diseases) ? Ok I'll tell you, again from ash's own website "Smoking costs the NHS approximately £1.5 billion a year for treating diseases caused by smoking"

OOOPS !!!

Tell me where they're going to get that £6.5 Billion quid from when no-one smokes and no-one has those diseases? Ah, thats right, all you non smokers will start to cough up, unlucky !

Lifes a bitch aint it

ASH - Action on Smoking and Health UK
Old 15 February 2007, 03:51 PM
  #21  
The Zohan
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
The Zohan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Disco, Disco!
Posts: 21,825
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Norman D. Landing
Well from ash's own website (ash.org.uk) "The Treasury earned £8,000 Million in revenue from tobacco duties for the financial year 2005-2006 (EXCLUDING VAT)"

Also "About 80% of the price of a packet of cigarrettes consists of taxation".

Go on, how much does the NHS cost (for smoking related diseases) ? Ok I'll tell you, again from ash's own website "Smoking costs the NHS approximately £1.5 billion a year for treating diseases caused by smoking"

OOOPS !!!

Tell me where they're going to get that £6.5 Billion quid from when no-one smokes and no-one has those diseases? Ah, thats right, all you non smokers will start to cough up, unlucky !

Lifes a bitch aint it

ASH - Action on Smoking and Health UK
<whispers> you put 8 million not billion at the top!

We about time there is some balance, asuming ASH are not acurate and say 100% out that would only be 3 billion leaving 5 billion for the treasury.
Old 15 February 2007, 04:04 PM
  #22  
Norman D. Landing
Scooby Regular
 
Norman D. Landing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 892
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Paul Habgood
<whispers> you put 8 million not billion at the top!

We about time there is some balance, asuming ASH are not acurate and say 100% out that would only be 3 billion leaving 5 billion for the treasury.
<Whispers, £8,000 Million = £8 Billion>

Moderators eh?
Old 15 February 2007, 04:07 PM
  #23  
The Zohan
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
The Zohan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Disco, Disco!
Posts: 21,825
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking

Originally Posted by Norman D. Landing
<Whispers, £8,000 Million = £8 Billion>

Moderators eh?

LMFAO - You cannot get the staff, cetainly true in my case.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
12
18 November 2015 07:03 AM
dpb
Non Scooby Related
14
03 October 2015 10:37 AM
the shreksta
General Technical
27
02 October 2015 03:20 PM
Ganz1983
Subaru
5
02 October 2015 09:22 AM
Benrowe727
ScoobyNet General
7
28 September 2015 07:05 AM



Quick Reply: 30m to be spent enforcing smoking ban Tough on smoking...



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:50 AM.