Bush - worlds number one terrorist?
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Tellins, Home of Super Leagues finest, and where a "split" is not all it seems.
Posts: 5,504
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Bush - worlds number one terrorist?
Man thrown off plane for 'terror' t-shirt | Metro.co.uk
It has to be seen to be believed!!!
Not even an american airline
Freedom of speech is no longer valid in the western world... Conform or be punished
It has to be seen to be believed!!!
Not even an american airline
Freedom of speech is no longer valid in the western world... Conform or be punished
#3
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Runway two seven right.
Posts: 6,652
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Man thrown off plane for 'terror' t-shirt | Metro.co.uk
It has to be seen to be believed!!!
Not even an american airline
Freedom of speech is no longer valid in the western world... Conform or be punished
It has to be seen to be believed!!!
Not even an american airline
Freedom of speech is no longer valid in the western world... Conform or be punished
Same man walks through security, gets talking to a guard and says " What do you think of Bush? Worlds number 1 terrorist?"
He gets pulled out, questioned and misses his flight until staff are satisfied of his credentials. ( That would happen )
What's the difference?
#4
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Croydon - returned to democracy! Yay!!
Posts: 3,682
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Good point, but Qantas got all self-righteous about the risk that the shirt might cause offence, not that it made the wearer a potential security risk...
Out of interest, what's the score with tickets, refunds etc if you miss your flight through being (innocently) detained by airport security?
SB
Out of interest, what's the score with tickets, refunds etc if you miss your flight through being (innocently) detained by airport security?
SB
#5
Don't forget this man was also prevented from boarding a flight at Heathrow by UK security apparently with the same t-shirt.
Here are more details. The guy is making a point and being a ********.
Qantas bans man over wearing 'Bush number 1 terrorist' shirt - 22 Jan 2007 - World
Here are more details. The guy is making a point and being a ********.
Qantas bans man over wearing 'Bush number 1 terrorist' shirt - 22 Jan 2007 - World
Last edited by KiwiGTI; 24 January 2007 at 02:19 PM.
#7
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Epsom
Posts: 5,832
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Who deems what is offensive? I find anyone who thinks Nu Labour is good idea offensive, are they going to be prevented from flying because I find them offensive? Its a ridiculous test
Trending Topics
#8
Man thrown off plane for 'terror' t-shirt | Metro.co.uk
It has to be seen to be believed!!!
Not even an american airline
Freedom of speech is no longer valid in the western world... Conform or be punished
It has to be seen to be believed!!!
Not even an american airline
Freedom of speech is no longer valid in the western world... Conform or be punished
not sure i agree with you there. if you're going to be deliberately inflammatory, you've got to take the possible consequences. don't forget, all airlines reserve the right to refuse you your seat - for whatever reason they deem fit.
sounds like the guy was trolling for a reaction in the stupidest of places, albeit to make his point. besides, no skipper/cabin crew would run the risk/distraction of him perhaps gobbing off and causing a ruck with someone at 35,000 ft who took exception to his provocative stance. he's clearly an argument waiting to happen.
#11
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Croydon - returned to democracy! Yay!!
Posts: 3,682
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It gets better. He was allowed through and then raised the subject himself - basically saying "Hey look at me - I've got this t-shirt on that you banned before and this time you've let it go..."
The bloke has elevated himself to a level of ****-dom previously reserved for certain trolls on this here board...
SB
The bloke has elevated himself to a level of ****-dom previously reserved for certain trolls on this here board...
SB
#12
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Runway two seven right.
Posts: 6,652
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It gets better. He was allowed through and then raised the subject himself - basically saying "Hey look at me - I've got this t-shirt on that you banned before and this time you've let it go..."
The bloke has elevated himself to a level of ****-dom previously reserved for certain trolls on this here board...
SB
The bloke has elevated himself to a level of ****-dom previously reserved for certain trolls on this here board...
SB
#13
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Tellins, Home of Super Leagues finest, and where a "split" is not all it seems.
Posts: 5,504
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think almost all on the flight would agree with his sentiment anyway so it would be unlikely to cause a furore on the plane once on.
Once searched, so to establish he was carrying no threat to the safety of the plane he should have been allowed to fly as normal under the same laws as the other passengers.
If I fly out from Manchester wearing a Man United top, or a rock band logo'd tshirt, I wouldnt expect to be told to take it off because someone might find it offensive...
Who deems what T-shirt is offensive? Do the american airport authorities make sure that this is printed on each ticket, next to the 'dont bring a bomb or gun on the plane' bit?
I guess if his tshirt had said 'death to non muslims', I might have felt differently, however
Once searched, so to establish he was carrying no threat to the safety of the plane he should have been allowed to fly as normal under the same laws as the other passengers.
If I fly out from Manchester wearing a Man United top, or a rock band logo'd tshirt, I wouldnt expect to be told to take it off because someone might find it offensive...
Who deems what T-shirt is offensive? Do the american airport authorities make sure that this is printed on each ticket, next to the 'dont bring a bomb or gun on the plane' bit?
I guess if his tshirt had said 'death to non muslims', I might have felt differently, however
#14
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Runway two seven right.
Posts: 6,652
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This guy wasn't wearing a football or rock group t-shirt.
#15
bit harsh brendan. not to tenerife i haven't.
but would you not say that brit binge drinkers getting even more irritatingly pi55ed-up in the air on a charter flight might be viewed slightly differently to someone attempting to board a scheduled flight operated by a country whose troops are at war, bearing a contentious slogan guaranteed to provoke a reaction? [not least in that the former issue is usually in the air and the latter one clearly on the ground and therefore easier to address].
regardless, you still hear of pi55ed passengers being refused entry at the gate, pi55ed passengers being arrested at their destination, pi55ed passengers being returned on the next flight back home and even entirely pi55ed planes being re-routed for safety reasons.
would he have worn a T-shirt with "osama bin-laden: world's #1 terrorist" while attempting to board a scheduled PIA flight in islamabad? i doubt it. i also suspect he'd have been given an equally difficult time by PIA ground staff at islamabad if he'd worn the bush one...
Last edited by Holy Ghost; 24 January 2007 at 03:43 PM.
#16
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: same time, different place
Posts: 11,313
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
2 Posts
If the guy had been taken off a flight in Texas or New York, I'd say your argument would have merit, there's a risk of a fight. But in Australia? No way. And I think you've got the point that people are far more at risk of creating a ruckus at 35 000 feet in other situations, when they are still allowed to fly, than this.
HG, I don't like your political views but I like most of your posts, they're usually valid, intelligent and well-argued. I thought the above was an exception, you were going a bit too tabloid
HG, I don't like your political views but I like most of your posts, they're usually valid, intelligent and well-argued. I thought the above was an exception, you were going a bit too tabloid
#17
If the guy had been taken off a flight in Texas or New York, I'd say your argument would have merit, there's a risk of a fight. But in Australia? No way. And I think you've got the point that people are far more at risk of creating a ruckus at 35 000 feet in other situations, when they are still allowed to fly, than this.
HG, I don't like your political views but I like most of your posts, they're usually valid, intelligent and well-argued. I thought the above was an exception, you were going a bit too tabloid
HG, I don't like your political views but I like most of your posts, they're usually valid, intelligent and well-argued. I thought the above was an exception, you were going a bit too tabloid
well it's a difficult, arguably subjective call; i would imagine the rule of thumb is err on the side of caution wherever possible/practical when it's a vulnerable aluminium tube under pressure.
that's kind of you to say brendan; proof positive that different views can co-habit without needing a flamesuit. for what it's worth, the same goes for your posts.
tabloid? oh dear. i must have inadvertently sat on my mother-in-law's daily mail ....
#18
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Tellins, Home of Super Leagues finest, and where a "split" is not all it seems.
Posts: 5,504
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That is true, but he was an australian dude not of an ethnic group in terms of this thread. I appreciate aussies are criminals and only work in bars but for the sake of this thread we'll move on
I would imagine that some of the london tube bombers and the 9/11 hijackers wore cotton tshirts. soo using your logic, cotton tshirts, regardless of logo should be banned full stop because ethnic groups DO wear them when commiting suicide...
I have a tshirt that says "I'm Spartacus" on it... Would I be prevented to fly because my passport says my name is Abdabadoodle MacPoodle?
Having read the other article now, I support the guy, in fact I applaud him for innocently challenging free speech and I pity the petulance of those that stopped him flying...
#19
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Runway two seven right.
Posts: 6,652
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
About your passport? Yes you would, if that isn't your real name.
Now, to the real world.
As someone that works at an airport, knows the current security situation, and many of the security guards who have to, on a daiy basis, put up with **** from muppets like this let me say this.
You sir, are a tw@t.
#20
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Tellins, Home of Super Leagues finest, and where a "split" is not all it seems.
Posts: 5,504
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well good for you. I admire your principled stand.
About your passport? Yes you would, if that isn't your real name.
Now, to the real world.
As someone that works at an airport, knows the current security situation, and many of the security guards who have to, on a daiy basis, put up with **** from muppets like this let me say this.
You sir, are a tw@t.
About your passport? Yes you would, if that isn't your real name.
Now, to the real world.
As someone that works at an airport, knows the current security situation, and many of the security guards who have to, on a daiy basis, put up with **** from muppets like this let me say this.
You sir, are a tw@t.
#22
You can't have totally free speech and I think there are many t-shirts that could be considered offensive.
#23
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Edinburgh (ish)
Posts: 8,089
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Bollox to the fact he wasn't allowed to fly. Still, I wouldn't have bee anywhere near as "principled". "Ok, where's your XXXXXXL Quantas t-shirt ?!"
#26
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Edinburgh (ish)
Posts: 8,089
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#27
#28
The airline, because people carrying/wearing political statements are just bad plain for business. Just look at all the bad publicity they got from this idiot and his t-shirt!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
28
28 December 2015 11:07 PM