Steve Wright Charged!!!
Steve Wright Charged!!!
Trending Topics
22 December 2006, 08:31 AM
#8
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,701
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So the BBC have really shafted that other blokes reputation now by broadcasting the anonymous interview he gave them for background, where he told them all about him ******** several of the prossies and taking them to get their drugs. Nice going.
22 December 2006, 08:34 AM
#9
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,759
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Iwan
So the BBC have really shafted that other blokes reputation now by broadcasting the anonymous interview he gave them for background, where he told them all about him ******** several of the prossies and taking them to get their drugs. Nice going.
i think he gave that information to the press in an interview of his own free will
22 December 2006, 09:22 AM
#13
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,701
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by wakeboardar
i think he gave that information to the press in an interview of his own free will
I guess he was a bit naive to believe they'd not broadcast it.
Btw I never liked Steve Wright's show.
22 December 2006, 09:28 AM
#15
Originally Posted by lightning101
It will be interesting now that he is innocent to see the 'evidence' that they had to keep him in custody for 4 days 
22 December 2006, 09:30 AM
#16
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Never do names esp. Joey, spaz or Mong
Posts: 39,688
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What I mean is that the police had to apply to the court to extend the time they could keep him in custody, they justified this by presenting their 'evidence' to magistrates 
22 December 2006, 11:29 AM
#20
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 3,236
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yes, it's called the law. You need to give your reasons for continuing to question someone further, but you don't need to produce evidence that they are guilty. Quite obvious really, if they had evidence that they were guilty they wouldn't need to keep questioning them, they'd just charge them. 
Still why pass up an opportunity to knock the Police eh?
Still why pass up an opportunity to knock the Police eh?
22 December 2006, 11:35 AM
#21
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Never do names esp. Joey, spaz or Mong
Posts: 39,688
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Who is knocking the police 
I just didn't understand the 4 days thing and wanted someone to explain it.
Why so paranoid ? I've never had any bother with the police, in fact quite the reverse.
I just didn't understand the 4 days thing and wanted someone to explain it.
Why so paranoid ? I've never had any bother with the police, in fact quite the reverse.
22 December 2006, 11:47 AM
#22
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 3,236
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sorry, just assumed you were one of the people on here who slag off the police at every opportunity. 
The police have to show that extended time for questioning is required. In a case like this I would imagine that would be fairly simple to do.
The police have to show that extended time for questioning is required. In a case like this I would imagine that would be fairly simple to do.
22 December 2006, 12:29 PM
#24
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Tellins, Home of Super Leagues finest, and where a "split" is not all it seems.
Posts: 5,504
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
They should have canned the investigation weeks ago and spent the money on more speed cameras
22 December 2006, 01:34 PM
#26
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 526
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Iwan
So the BBC have really shafted that other blokes reputation now by broadcasting the anonymous interview he gave them for background, where he told them all about him ******** several of the prossies and taking them to get their drugs. Nice going.
And as for the picture of him on the front page of The Star or The Sun in stockings and suspenders.........................poor f**ker,i just hope he gets to keep his job in Tesco's
22 December 2006, 01:45 PM
#27
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 267
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by paul2070
And as for the picture of him on the front page of The Star or The Sun in stockings and suspenders.........................poor f**ker,i just hope he gets to keep his job in Tesco's
22 December 2006, 06:17 PM
#29
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 267
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by paul2070
22 December 2006, 06:22 PM
#30
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 526
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Am i the only one (on here at least),that was ever so slightly disappointed that they caught him so soon??? I thought we might have a modern day Peter Sutcliffe on our hands,and he managed 13.