7300 jobs lost in the last 24hours...
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Scoobynet
Posts: 5,387
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
7300 jobs lost in the last 24hours...
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article...172951,00.html
This is starting to get silly, just recently we've had:
Ntl - 6000 jobs cut
Littlewoods direct - 1200 cut
Orange - 2000 cut
TVR - hundreds cut
Peugeot - few thousand cut wasnt it?
How long is this going to go on for? Seems every other day you hear of a firm going under, or cutting significant numbers of jobs?....
This is starting to get silly, just recently we've had:
Ntl - 6000 jobs cut
Littlewoods direct - 1200 cut
Orange - 2000 cut
TVR - hundreds cut
Peugeot - few thousand cut wasnt it?
How long is this going to go on for? Seems every other day you hear of a firm going under, or cutting significant numbers of jobs?....
#2
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Disco, Disco!
Posts: 21,825
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It is a sad state of affairs. I am sure would have been natural wastage but out of 7000 approx - I wonder how many.
I wonder what job opportunities will be avaliable to these people.
Kinda follows on from
http://bbs.scoobynet.co.uk/showthread.php?t=509528
I wonder what job opportunities will be avaliable to these people.
Kinda follows on from
http://bbs.scoobynet.co.uk/showthread.php?t=509528
Last edited by The Zohan; 10 May 2006 at 08:59 AM.
#5
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: A big town with sh1t shops: Northampton
Posts: 21,366
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It probably doesn't include young people or those who lost their job on a day with a "d" in it.
This Government love targets, perhaps they've set themselves one to massage the figures. Remember, 98% of statistics are made up.
This Government love targets, perhaps they've set themselves one to massage the figures. Remember, 98% of statistics are made up.
#6
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: same time, different place
Posts: 11,313
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
2 Posts
Gotta love SN (how many times have I said that recently? )
Try going to Advanced Search, type "NTL" for Thread Titles, and search in NSR.
In five years on this board I think 99% of the posts about NTL had a cuss or a in them.
And now you're concerned/upset that they've had to sack 6000 people?
Same could probably be said for Orange recently.
Why is there no post "Thank God those stupid companies are paying for their ****-ups at last"?
Try going to Advanced Search, type "NTL" for Thread Titles, and search in NSR.
In five years on this board I think 99% of the posts about NTL had a cuss or a in them.
And now you're concerned/upset that they've had to sack 6000 people?
Same could probably be said for Orange recently.
Why is there no post "Thank God those stupid companies are paying for their ****-ups at last"?
#7
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: A big town with sh1t shops: Northampton
Posts: 21,366
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Brendan, you could look at it this way: if their customer service was bad anyway, what's it going to be like with 6,000 less staff?
I hate ntl, but I feel sorry for the people losing their jobs all the same.
I hate ntl, but I feel sorry for the people losing their jobs all the same.
Trending Topics
#8
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Disco, Disco!
Posts: 21,825
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Brendan Hughes
Gotta love SN (how many times have I said that recently? )
Try going to Advanced Search, type "NTL" for Thread Titles, and search in NSR.
In five years on this board I think 99% of the posts about NTL had a cuss or a in them.
And now you're concerned/upset that they've had to sack 6000 people?
Same could probably be said for Orange recently.
Why is there no post "Thank God those stupid companies are paying for their ****-ups at last"?
Try going to Advanced Search, type "NTL" for Thread Titles, and search in NSR.
In five years on this board I think 99% of the posts about NTL had a cuss or a in them.
And now you're concerned/upset that they've had to sack 6000 people?
Same could probably be said for Orange recently.
Why is there no post "Thank God those stupid companies are paying for their ****-ups at last"?
I have been fecked about by people in UK call centres and Indian call centres.
I do however place the blame squarely with the management of the company. Rubbish processes, poor training, uninterested employess/crap morale is usually always down to the management or mismanagment of the company.
However getting rid of the odd bad employees is difficult as well.
Last edited by The Zohan; 10 May 2006 at 09:56 AM.
#9
Originally Posted by Paul3446
Amazingly enough though, government figures show unemployment at an all time low!
Also, keep in mind that announcements of job losses are typically announced upfront (for shareholder benefit), whereas the actual attrition takes place over a period of time, which could even be years.
HTH
Suresh
#11
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Disco, Disco!
Posts: 21,825
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Suresh
Sorry to p1ss on your chips, but UK Government figures are produced according to ILO standards and have been since around 1997. This means that the Government cannot arbitrarily manipulate the figures.
Also, keep in mind that announcements of job losses are typically announced upfront (for shareholder benefit), whereas the actual attrition takes place over a period of time, which could even be years.
HTH
Suresh
Also, keep in mind that announcements of job losses are typically announced upfront (for shareholder benefit), whereas the actual attrition takes place over a period of time, which could even be years.
HTH
Suresh
A mate who has been self employed for three years has just gone to sign on, She lost a big contract and has decided to go back into employment.
She went to sign on and was unable to as he was self employed between april 2003-4. not paid class 1 nat ins (paid by the employer so not if you are self employed you pay class 2)
She does not qualify for job seakers allowance and is not part of the unemployed.
So just tell me again the figures cannot be manipulated
I am sure she is not unique, this was nearly my situation as well however i start work next week in Dubai!
Last edited by The Zohan; 10 May 2006 at 10:12 AM.
#12
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Scoobynet
Posts: 5,387
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Suresh
Sorry to p1ss on your chips, but UK Government figures are produced according to ILO standards and have been since around 1997. This means that the Government cannot arbitrarily manipulate the figures.
#14
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by Paul Habgood
Not sure how it works exactly but here you go;
A mate who has been self employed for three years has just gone to sign on, She lost a big contract and has decided to go back into employment.
She went to sign on and was unable to as he was self employed between april 2003-4. not paid class 1 nat ins (paid by the employer so not if you are self employed you pay class 2)
She does not qualify for job seakers allowance and is not part of the unemployed.
So just tell me again the figures cannot be manipulated
I am sure she is not unique, this was nearly my situation as well however i start work next week in Dubai!
A mate who has been self employed for three years has just gone to sign on, She lost a big contract and has decided to go back into employment.
She went to sign on and was unable to as he was self employed between april 2003-4. not paid class 1 nat ins (paid by the employer so not if you are self employed you pay class 2)
She does not qualify for job seakers allowance and is not part of the unemployed.
So just tell me again the figures cannot be manipulated
I am sure she is not unique, this was nearly my situation as well however i start work next week in Dubai!
And other *manipulation*: number *disabled* has gone up dramatically since '97. Lots of other unemployed havfe been *hoovered* up into the public sector doing what we call *non jobs* so that a) the jobless total stays low and b) they're more likely to vote Nu Labia ..... And people wonder why their taxes have gone up .....
Still, the ediface has started to crumble ......
Dave
#16
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Disco, Disco!
Posts: 21,825
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by hutton_d
Yep. This is what happened to me last year. Oh, and as I told them I had saved my tax money (paying at the end of the year) I then had too much savings to qualify for JA ... 'but it's to pay my tax bill!!'. 'Not our problem guv ...' ....
And other *manipulation*: number *disabled* has gone up dramatically since '97. Lots of other unemployed havfe been *hoovered* up into the public sector doing what we call *non jobs* so that a) the jobless total stays low and b) they're more likely to vote Nu Labia ..... And people wonder why their taxes have gone up .....
Still, the ediface has started to crumble ......
Dave
And other *manipulation*: number *disabled* has gone up dramatically since '97. Lots of other unemployed havfe been *hoovered* up into the public sector doing what we call *non jobs* so that a) the jobless total stays low and b) they're more likely to vote Nu Labia ..... And people wonder why their taxes have gone up .....
Still, the ediface has started to crumble ......
Dave
#17
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Talk to the hand....
Posts: 13,331
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Suresh
Sorry to p1ss on your chips, but UK Government figures are produced according to ILO standards and have been since around 1997. This means that the Government cannot arbitrarily manipulate the figures.
Also, keep in mind that announcements of job losses are typically announced upfront (for shareholder benefit), whereas the actual attrition takes place over a period of time, which could even be years.
HTH
Suresh
Also, keep in mind that announcements of job losses are typically announced upfront (for shareholder benefit), whereas the actual attrition takes place over a period of time, which could even be years.
HTH
Suresh
#18
Wonder how many outsourced jobs (roughly) there have been since it was the trendy thing to do, coupled with redundancies in relation to new jobs created over the last nine years?
Someone will have a good idea and the impact on the UK.Then there will be Suresh's version .
Someone will have a good idea and the impact on the UK.Then there will be Suresh's version .
#19
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 12,304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Petem95
We need to look at official unemployment figures AND the numbers on disability to get the true picture...
#20
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: same time, different place
Posts: 11,313
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
2 Posts
- like it. All the crap NTL and Orange helpline people are now employed on benefits helplines instead. Massive drops in benefit claims as people can't work their way through the system to get an answer
#21
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Cardiff
Posts: 2,266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The unemployment figures have always been fiddled - the figures show people claiming unemployment benefit, but dont include those who get moved sideways onto New Deal or similar training schemes, which become compulsory after a certain amount of time signing on.
The New Deal is one of the ways Labour supported their claim of halving the unemployment in this country - they just signed people off the Dole and onto New Deal instead ( which wasnt counted in the figures ), then when the New Deal period ends, the person gets stuck back on the dole, and the next lot go on New Deal.
Much as I dislike them, you have to think the French or Germans would never put up with half the crap we have to in this country ( lets face it, the French will start rioting for pretty much any reason ).
The New Deal is one of the ways Labour supported their claim of halving the unemployment in this country - they just signed people off the Dole and onto New Deal instead ( which wasnt counted in the figures ), then when the New Deal period ends, the person gets stuck back on the dole, and the next lot go on New Deal.
Much as I dislike them, you have to think the French or Germans would never put up with half the crap we have to in this country ( lets face it, the French will start rioting for pretty much any reason ).
#22
Scooby Regular
We have never had it so good!!!!
And if YOU haven't got it good then it's YOUR fault for being so pathetic as to blame everything else except YOURSELF!!
Those who want others to do everything for them ALWAYS moan and blubber and cry that it's not fair ...... the BEST get up, get out and DO something for themselves!!!
Losers and winners .... it's always been the same, so - who are the losers? Hands up Leslie, petem95, unclebuck, ollyk, paul hapgood, you KNOW who you are!
Pete
And if YOU haven't got it good then it's YOUR fault for being so pathetic as to blame everything else except YOURSELF!!
Those who want others to do everything for them ALWAYS moan and blubber and cry that it's not fair ...... the BEST get up, get out and DO something for themselves!!!
Losers and winners .... it's always been the same, so - who are the losers? Hands up Leslie, petem95, unclebuck, ollyk, paul hapgood, you KNOW who you are!
Pete
#23
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 12,304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Pug is shutting its Ryton plant later this year. Interestingly they had to decide between Ryton plant or Paris plant. Now you may be partly correct in thinking that it is political that a French company keeps the Paris plant open, however, it's also interesting when you see what the comparitive redundancy pay outs are. When you look at that, it makes financial sense, it's way cheaper to ditch the British workers.
#26
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Disco, Disco!
Posts: 21,825
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by unclebuck
Shift at Morrisons finished then?
15% Morissons staff discount and a spiffy uniform to boot - i bet PSL has never had it so good !
#27
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 12,304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by pslewis
We have never had it so good!!!!
And if YOU haven't got it good then it's YOUR fault for being so pathetic as to blame everything else except YOURSELF!!
Those who want others to do everything for them ALWAYS moan and blubber and cry that it's not fair ...... the BEST get up, get out and DO something for themselves!!!
Losers and winners .... it's always been the same, so - who are the losers? Hands up Leslie, petem95, unclebuck, ollyk, paul hapgood, you KNOW who you are!
Pete
And if YOU haven't got it good then it's YOUR fault for being so pathetic as to blame everything else except YOURSELF!!
Those who want others to do everything for them ALWAYS moan and blubber and cry that it's not fair ...... the BEST get up, get out and DO something for themselves!!!
Losers and winners .... it's always been the same, so - who are the losers? Hands up Leslie, petem95, unclebuck, ollyk, paul hapgood, you KNOW who you are!
Pete
#28
Originally Posted by MikeCardiff
The unemployment figures have always been fiddled - the figures show people claiming unemployment benefit, but dont include those who get moved sideways onto New Deal or similar training schemes, which become compulsory after a certain amount of time signing on.
I suppose you are too young to remember the YTS scam then? The Tories actually changed the way unemployment stats are measured 18 times whilst in office.
The point is that under preferred ILO methods countries can fiddle their figures, but only in certain, consistent ways. This means than figures become comparable between countries and more importantly, between periods. And for Pete95 (IQ) the numbers on disability are little changed since NL took office.
But why let the facts get in the way of your BNP circle jerk....
#29
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Scoobynet
Posts: 5,387
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Suresh
Of course the figures are fiddled. They always have been.
Originally Posted by Suresh
The Tories actually changed the way unemployment stats are measured 18 times whilst in office.
Originally Posted by Suresh
And for Pete95 (IQ)
#30
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Scoobynet
Posts: 5,387
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
To add to the list, Vauxhall have just announced they may cut 1000 jobs in the UK
http://uk.news.yahoo.com/10052006/32...-000-jobs.html
http://uk.news.yahoo.com/10052006/32...-000-jobs.html