Two kids died as a result of their parents (in)action
21 March 2006, 12:52 PM
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Disco, Disco!
Posts: 21,825
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Two kids died as a result of their parents (in)action
21 March 2006, 12:59 PM
#2
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: A big town with sh1t shops: Northampton
Posts: 21,366
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yeah, saw the cameras setting up as I drove past this morning.
Someone needs to make sure they never have kids again. They didn't have the intelligence to look after them properly.
Someone needs to make sure they never have kids again. They didn't have the intelligence to look after them properly.
21 March 2006, 01:00 PM
#3
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Weston Super Mare, Somerset.
Posts: 14,102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Judge Bray told Lindsey Miller: "I am satisfied you encouraged Nathan, aged two, to play with matches as some kind of party trick.
"You continued to allow him access to matches even after you had been warned by neighbours and your mother."
===
beggars belief.......
"You continued to allow him access to matches even after you had been warned by neighbours and your mother."
===
beggars belief.......
21 March 2006, 01:01 PM
#4
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Please excuse my Spelling - its not the best !!
Posts: 2,538
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Very sad,
"The court has heard that the couple both had IQs of just 66"
Unbelievable on how they where allowed to have children in the first place !
Sterialising them would be best thing when they get out jail !
Richard
"The court has heard that the couple both had IQs of just 66"
Unbelievable on how they where allowed to have children in the first place !
Sterialising them would be best thing when they get out jail !
Richard
21 March 2006, 02:25 PM
#5
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Disco, Disco!
Posts: 21,825
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by rsarjantson
Very sad,
"The court has heard that the couple both had IQs of just 66"
Unbelievable on how they where allowed to have children in the first place !
Sterialising them would be best thing when they get out jail !
Richard
"The court has heard that the couple both had IQs of just 66"
Unbelievable on how they where allowed to have children in the first place !
Sterialising them would be best thing when they get out jail !
Richard
they should not be allowd to keep pets let alone have more kids. I think they should be sterilised!
21 March 2006, 04:21 PM
#7
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 1,623
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
IQ of 66.. So bloody what if they have a score of 66.. Guess it depends if it was timed or not really doesnt it.. therefore it means sod all IMO..
Dont agree with what they did though..
Dont agree with what they did though..
Trending Topics
21 March 2006, 04:49 PM
#8
Scooby Regular
Originally Posted by ScoobywagonGl
the should be locked in a room and set alight 
If they are both of a low mental capacity and have children the emphasis of responsibility should fall on the local authorities.
Time after time after time you hear of children dying and it turns out that the parents had issues and although the local authorities knew about it they did nothing.
We have a couple near us who are of a low mental capacity and they have a son who I suspect isn't the full shilling either. The parents were both in care as they were deemed incapable of looking after themselves or their child.
Subsequently they were allowed to live on thier own under supervision and eventually they were allowed their child back - again under supervision.
The parents in this case did an awful thing but quite frankly more should have been done to protect those children.
21 March 2006, 05:59 PM
#9
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Earth
Posts: 912
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Giving a 2 year old matches ffs.,the authorities have a lot to answer for as they knew that these people were totally incapable of looking after children or a pet for that matter.I really think people like this who are badly retarded should be sterilised so they can't have kids. The whole thing from start to finish is just very,very sad!
21 March 2006, 06:12 PM
#10
Scooby Senior
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 3,546
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
and the neighbours and the grandmother knew and tried to tell them
I have had experience at how hard it is for the authorities to get the courts to agree for a child to be removed from the family unit. They do try hard but are restricted and it all takes time to pass through the courts.
I have had experience at how hard it is for the authorities to get the courts to agree for a child to be removed from the family unit. They do try hard but are restricted and it all takes time to pass through the courts.
21 March 2006, 10:57 PM
#14
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 12,329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Dont worry, lessons will be learnt !!!
if these two numptys had an iq that low, how did they manage to set up house,
clearly they should have been identified as at risk, and appropriate monitoring factored in..
again tragically two children have to die before someone actually notices anything was wrong.
no doubt another reviw will happen, a few psuedo posts created and a new inititive rolled out, to be forgotten and dropped once the spolight moves to the next tragidy
Mart
if these two numptys had an iq that low, how did they manage to set up house,
clearly they should have been identified as at risk, and appropriate monitoring factored in..
again tragically two children have to die before someone actually notices anything was wrong.
no doubt another reviw will happen, a few psuedo posts created and a new inititive rolled out, to be forgotten and dropped once the spolight moves to the next tragidy
Mart
22 March 2006, 08:05 AM
#15
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 15,271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by scrappydoo
IQ of 66.. So bloody what if they have a score of 66.. Guess it depends if it was timed or not really doesnt it.. therefore it means sod all IMO..
Anything below an IQ of 75 is regarded as a risk for being able to care for yourself never mind anyone else.
It is very sad and some responsibilty should fall to their family and the local authorities.
It may just seem like a number, but an IQ this low means that they are very unlikely to be able to understand the consequences of locking a two year old in a room with some matches.
22 March 2006, 08:07 AM
#16
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Disco, Disco!
Posts: 21,825
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Rannoch
WTF?
Anything below an IQ of 75 is regarded as a risk for being able to care for yourself never mind anyone else.
It is very sad and some responsibilty should fall to their family and the local authorities.
It may just seem like a number, but an IQ this low means that they are very unlikely to be able to understand the consequences of locking a two year old in a room with some matches.
Anything below an IQ of 75 is regarded as a risk for being able to care for yourself never mind anyone else.
It is very sad and some responsibilty should fall to their family and the local authorities.
It may just seem like a number, but an IQ this low means that they are very unlikely to be able to understand the consequences of locking a two year old in a room with some matches.
Thanks for the info.
With that in mind I really do think it would be better to sterilise people with an IQ of less than 75.
26 March 2006, 05:34 AM
#17
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 1,623
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Rannoch
WTF?
Anything below an IQ of 75 is regarded as a risk for being able to care for yourself never mind anyone else.
It is very sad and some responsibilty should fall to their family and the local authorities.
It may just seem like a number, but an IQ this low means that they are very unlikely to be able to understand the consequences of locking a two year old in a room with some matches.
Anything below an IQ of 75 is regarded as a risk for being able to care for yourself never mind anyone else.
It is very sad and some responsibilty should fall to their family and the local authorities.
It may just seem like a number, but an IQ this low means that they are very unlikely to be able to understand the consequences of locking a two year old in a room with some matches.
26 March 2006, 09:07 AM
#18
Sod the IQ's, let just say they were thick as pig ****, now thats a test that stands the test of time.
Heres the maths
2 year old + matches = disaster
Scrappydo, how long did it take you to get your score up that high, did you just keep pressing the buttons ?
Heres the maths
2 year old + matches = disaster
Scrappydo, how long did it take you to get your score up that high, did you just keep pressing the buttons ?
26 March 2006, 09:19 AM
#19
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Disco, Disco!
Posts: 21,825
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by J4CKO
Sod the IQ's, let just say they were thick as pig ****, now thats a test that stands the test of time.
Heres the maths
2 year old + matches = disaster
Heres the maths
2 year old + matches = disaster
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
fatboy_coach
General Technical
15
18 June 2016 03:48 PM