Why DO The Toffs Think THey Are Above The Law??
Why do they think they can hunt even though it's illegal!!!???
They are the first to jump up and down if a union goes on strike and damages one of their businesses!!
I'll not post photo's of foxes getting killed ...... you can google for those yourself, I'm assuming that why my last post got deleted?
I propose that we throw the Huntsmen into prison for 4 weeks ..... should be interesting, I wonder what the inmates would make of them??
Big Gay Billy who looks after the showers might want them to feel what a fox feels like as it is chased down and terrified!!
Pete
They are the first to jump up and down if a union goes on strike and damages one of their businesses!!
I'll not post photo's of foxes getting killed ...... you can google for those yourself, I'm assuming that why my last post got deleted?
I propose that we throw the Huntsmen into prison for 4 weeks ..... should be interesting, I wonder what the inmates would make of them??
Big Gay Billy who looks after the showers might want them to feel what a fox feels like as it is chased down and terrified!!
Pete
Last edited by pslewis; Feb 12, 2006 at 01:11 PM.
Originally Posted by Spoon

You ACTUALLY open a thread you have no interest in, you ACTUALLY read it, you ACTUALLY think up an answer, then you ACTUALLY type it out and then you ACTUALLY post it!!

You DO see that its not normal behaviour don't you???
Pete
Originally Posted by pslewis
You need help .........
You ACTUALLY open a thread you have no interest in, you ACTUALLY read it, you ACTUALLY think up an answer, then you ACTUALLY type it out and then you ACTUALLY post it!!
You DO see that its not normal behaviour don't you???
Pete
You ACTUALLY open a thread you have no interest in, you ACTUALLY read it, you ACTUALLY think up an answer, then you ACTUALLY type it out and then you ACTUALLY post it!!

You DO see that its not normal behaviour don't you???
Pete
That was enough for me to post a
without reading the content.So to clarify for a self important, egotystical nobody as yourself, I did open the thread, I never read it, I certainly never thought of a response, they are quite automatic where your name is connected, but I did post the response.
Oh and your constant whining about behaviour not being normal to everybody.
Sorry to burst your bubble.
But why bother spoon - u just make yourself look like a ****. This is a valid thread!! The ******* need sorting out.
You may not give a shyte about animals, but others do!
You may not give a shyte about animals, but others do!
Last edited by SiDHEaD; Feb 12, 2006 at 01:34 PM.
Trending Topics
The hunters knew Labour would only 'ban' hunting to keep the public happy, but not enforce the ban. They can pretty much carry on as normal in many parts, as the Police are too busy out on the roads raising revenue for Gordon Brown 
Hopefully we'll get a government in oneday who keep their promises..

Hopefully we'll get a government in oneday who keep their promises..
Originally Posted by SiDHEaD
But why bother spoon - u just make yourself look like a ****. This is a valid thread!! The ******* need sorting out.
You may not give a shyte about animals, but others do!
You may not give a shyte about animals, but others do!
The
was merely a response to him reposting until he gets his way, you know, a bit like a child would.My response had nothing to do with the animals, I suppose you come along too late to understand it like UB did.
As for looking a ****, don't you as an adult male drive a S2000?
I rest my case.
Originally Posted by SiDHEaD
But why bother spoon - u just make yourself look like a ****. This is a valid thread!! The ******* need sorting out.
You may not give a shyte about animals, but others do!
You may not give a shyte about animals, but others do!
The majority of people who complain about hunting are the very same that eat their eggs from battery hens who know bugger all about life in the countryside.
Chip
Originally Posted by chip
If the Gov is so concerned about animal welfare why do they still allow 30 million chickens to live in a cage on an area the size of a sheet of A4 paper.
Thats where animals killed by having their throats cut and bled to death, rather than using more modern and far more humane techniques.
I thought it was only hunting with dogs that was made illegal? I assume they are still doing it, after all, what is the penalty, and I'm sure there are grey areas and loopholes aplenty.
I've always thought there are much more urgent issues than whether or not a bunch of wannabe lords tear over the country side after a fox. I'd rather they didn't kill an outnumbered animal, and I do like animals, but I don't see why people get so wound up about this issue, personally.......
I've always thought there are much more urgent issues than whether or not a bunch of wannabe lords tear over the country side after a fox. I'd rather they didn't kill an outnumbered animal, and I do like animals, but I don't see why people get so wound up about this issue, personally.......
Originally Posted by SiDHEaD
But why bother spoon - u just make yourself look like a ****. This is a valid thread!! The ******* need sorting out.
You may not give a shyte about animals, but others do!
You may not give a shyte about animals, but others do!
I think that hunters should direct their attention; and their hounds, towards pikeys. Theyre a far more serious threat to the countrysides well-being..... and theyre legal to hunt with dags too!
Simon
Simon
Originally Posted by Petem95
They also still allow halal meat FFS
Thats where animals killed by having their throats cut and bled to death, rather than using more modern and far more humane techniques.
Thats where animals killed by having their throats cut and bled to death, rather than using more modern and far more humane techniques.They are quite simply above the law because of their religion.
Originally Posted by unclebuck
This is allowed for the same reasons that the people who do this allowed to roam the streets of London waving placards inciting murder and calling for acts of terrorism.
They are quite simply above the law because of their religion.
They are quite simply above the law because of their religion.
Last edited by 2000TLondon; Feb 12, 2006 at 05:34 PM.
Originally Posted by 2000TLondon
FFS, have you ever seen how McDonalds kill their cows? Or how KFC breed and kill their "chickens"?
However just because one practice may be abhorrent doesn't mean the other isn't.
Pete,
The answer is "Because they can", and that suits most people, me included, just fine. People act illegally, be it speeding, fraudulently claiming benefit, driving an Impreza when they have a bus pass etc etc
One can only hope those stupid ******* in Whitehall realise that when a law makes absolutely no sense whatsoever, those affected by it will exercise their right to ignore it.
The principle is the same as doing more than 70 on the motorway. It's illegal, but frankly it's outdated and draconian and this is why it is ignored.
And before the "what about the foxes" outcry comes. Who cares about a few foxes? I see more on the roadside having been run over, than may "accidently" get killed by local hunts

Matt
The answer is "Because they can", and that suits most people, me included, just fine. People act illegally, be it speeding, fraudulently claiming benefit, driving an Impreza when they have a bus pass etc etc

One can only hope those stupid ******* in Whitehall realise that when a law makes absolutely no sense whatsoever, those affected by it will exercise their right to ignore it.
The principle is the same as doing more than 70 on the motorway. It's illegal, but frankly it's outdated and draconian and this is why it is ignored.
And before the "what about the foxes" outcry comes. Who cares about a few foxes? I see more on the roadside having been run over, than may "accidently" get killed by local hunts

Matt
Originally Posted by unclebuck
Never seen it first hand. Why? Have you? I have read Fast Food Nation though so I am in possession of the facts, and I agree with you. I wouldn't touch fast food or so called 'ready meals' with a barge pole. I also rarely eat red meat or poultry.
However just because one practice may be abhorrent doesn't mean the other isn't.
However just because one practice may be abhorrent doesn't mean the other isn't.
Originally Posted by 2000TLondon
So they're not "above the law because of their religion" after all??????
Originally Posted by 2000TLondon
Surely the point of this forum is everyone is allowed to express their opinions, no matter what they may be?
Originally Posted by Spoon
So to clarify for a self important, egotystical nobody as yourself, I did open the thread, I never read it, I certainly never thought of a response, they are quite automatic where your name is connected, but I did post the response.
Please say you will ask doc for treatment tomorrow .... I do worry for you even though you are as thick as a board...
Pete
Originally Posted by pslewis
Like I said, loser, you need help and FAST!!!!!
Please say you will ask doc for treatment tomorrow .... I do worry for you even though you are as thick as a board...
Pete
Please say you will ask doc for treatment tomorrow .... I do worry for you even though you are as thick as a board...
Pete
Originally Posted by MattOz
Pete,
The answer is "Because they can", and that suits most people, me included, just fine. People act illegally, be it speeding, fraudulently claiming benefit, driving an Impreza when they have a bus pass etc etc
One can only hope those stupid ******* in Whitehall realise that when a law makes absolutely no sense whatsoever, those affected by it will exercise their right to ignore it.
The principle is the same as doing more than 70 on the motorway. It's illegal, but frankly it's outdated and draconian and this is why it is ignored.
And before the "what about the foxes" outcry comes. Who cares about a few foxes? I see more on the roadside having been run over, than may "accidently" get killed by local hunts

Matt
The answer is "Because they can", and that suits most people, me included, just fine. People act illegally, be it speeding, fraudulently claiming benefit, driving an Impreza when they have a bus pass etc etc

One can only hope those stupid ******* in Whitehall realise that when a law makes absolutely no sense whatsoever, those affected by it will exercise their right to ignore it.
The principle is the same as doing more than 70 on the motorway. It's illegal, but frankly it's outdated and draconian and this is why it is ignored.
And before the "what about the foxes" outcry comes. Who cares about a few foxes? I see more on the roadside having been run over, than may "accidently" get killed by local hunts

Matt
And us Scots appear to have been able to deal with it.
The difference is that the Scottish "toffs" that hunt appear to realise that having living creatures scared half to death and then torn to pieces and then using the bits that are left to mark each other with blood is, in a civilised society, not really on.
Personally, I think the hunt sabateurs should pick off the odd huntsman or woman with high velocity rifles rather than running around the countryside, that would make it a bit more interesting

And whilst I may work in the city, I've lived in and around the countryside my whole life, so before anyone says I don't know what its like, I can assure you I do
Originally Posted by Diablo
Its been law in Scotland for a while now Matt.
And us Scots appear to have been able to deal with it.
The difference is that the Scottish "toffs" that hunt appear to realise that having living creatures scared half to death and then torn to pieces and then using the bits that are left to mark each other with blood is, in a civilised society, not really on.
Personally, I think the hunt sabateurs should pick off the odd huntsman or woman with high velocity rifles rather than running around the countryside, that would make it a bit more interesting
And whilst I may work in the city, I've lived in and around the countryside my whole life, so before anyone says I don't know what its like, I can assure you I do
And us Scots appear to have been able to deal with it.
The difference is that the Scottish "toffs" that hunt appear to realise that having living creatures scared half to death and then torn to pieces and then using the bits that are left to mark each other with blood is, in a civilised society, not really on.
Personally, I think the hunt sabateurs should pick off the odd huntsman or woman with high velocity rifles rather than running around the countryside, that would make it a bit more interesting

And whilst I may work in the city, I've lived in and around the countryside my whole life, so before anyone says I don't know what its like, I can assure you I do

The audacity. How ******* dare you.


