Notices
Non Scooby Related Anything Non-Scooby related

The Root of all Evil??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 9, 2006 | 08:37 PM
  #1  
gljam's Avatar
gljam
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,253
Likes: 0
From: evesham, worcester
Default The Root of all Evil??

Anyone watching this on channel 4 at the mo???

how the hell can these religious muppets believe the crap they do and be so oblivious to reality???

probably opening a can of worms here, but ffs!! can't they open their eyes??
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2006 | 08:50 PM
  #2  
specialx's Avatar
specialx
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 4,313
Likes: 0
From: WWW.SCOOBYCLINIC.COM
Default

Reply
Old Jan 9, 2006 | 09:15 PM
  #3  
gotmashed's Avatar
gotmashed
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,411
Likes: 0
From: www.aroundthesouth.co.uk
Default

we are also watching this i mean wtf..... theres nothing more that can be said apart from lets let them all come and live here .......
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2006 | 09:17 PM
  #4  
Trout's Avatar
Trout
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 1999
Posts: 15,271
Likes: 0
From: UK
Default

Brilliant programme from a controversial evolutionist.

Most scary was the friend of Mr Bush!
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2006 | 09:21 PM
  #5  
gljam's Avatar
gljam
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,253
Likes: 0
From: evesham, worcester
Default

yep

i realise that he interviewed the extremes of each religion and doesn't represent the views of the average religious person, but there seemed to be plenty of people that are happy to be sucked into it.
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2006 | 10:34 PM
  #6  
Dracoro's Avatar
Dracoro
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 10,261
Likes: 0
From: A powerslide near you
Default

Originally Posted by gljam
yep

i realise that he interviewed the extremes of each religion and doesn't represent the views of the average religious person, but there seemed to be plenty of people that are happy to be sucked into it.
That's the problem. The 'moderate' religious people (generally the ok ones ) are shrinking yet the evangelicals and fundamentalists are growing and growing. Long term, this will lead to more war, no peace and a worse off world. Problem is, there's no real way out of it unless you have world leaders who are moderate like G Bush.................. Oh ****!
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2006 | 10:54 PM
  #7  
2000TLondon's Avatar
2000TLondon
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,105
Likes: 0
From: Texas - It's BIG!
Default

The ironic thing is, I think, that most, if not all of the extremists are being brain washed, manipulated and exploited by their superiors for reasons other than "religion"

I think everything possible should be done to protect non-extremists, and everything should be done to seperate extremists from the religious groups they think they "represent".
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Jan 10, 2006 | 12:21 AM
  #8  
Daz34's Avatar
Daz34
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 10,641
Likes: 0
From: here
Default

Great program. Fair play to Channel 4 for putting it on. Richard Dawkins makes a very convincing argument doesn't he?
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2006 | 12:38 PM
  #9  
Leslie's Avatar
Leslie
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 39,877
Likes: 0
Default

He makes a very one sided argument designed to appeal to whose who are looking for an excuse for the fact that they don't want to believe in religion because it would be inconvenient to their life style. It is just so easy to lump the world's troubles on religious teachings when as ever the troubles are down to people, not the religions.

2000TL has posted the real basic reasons for trouble which is unfairly blamed ***** nilly on belief in a God.

Fundamentalists are the real problem whether they are religious or not, and these are the ones who should be sorted. It is not right to denigrate those who follow the basic teachings of their religion and lead a blameless and good life being unselfish and thinking of others before themselves.

Les
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2006 | 01:24 PM
  #10  
RichWalk's Avatar
RichWalk
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 17,450
Likes: 0
From: "Comfortably Numb" since Aug 2003
Default

Originally Posted by Leslie
He makes a very one sided argument designed to appeal to whose who are looking for an excuse for the fact that they don't want to believe in religion because it would be inconvenient to their life style. It is just so easy to lump the world's troubles on religious teachings when as ever the troubles are down to people, not the religions.

2000TL has posted the real basic reasons for trouble which is unfairly blamed ***** nilly on belief in a God.

Fundamentalists are the real problem whether they are religious or not, and these are the ones who should be sorted. It is not right to denigrate those who follow the basic teachings of their religion and lead a blameless and good life being unselfish and thinking of others before themselves.

Les
Fair point Les, however he was also pointing out that you do not need religion to either be a decent person or have a basic code of moral conduct, therefore would we not be better off without any form of religion? I for one (even though I am a firm none believer) see where he is coming from but am certainly not sure there is an 'everyman' type of answer that could provide the same amount of comfort and strength that current moderate religion provides.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2006 | 01:38 PM
  #11  
2000TLondon's Avatar
2000TLondon
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,105
Likes: 0
From: Texas - It's BIG!
Default

I personally am not religious, but I can understand, and it's really quite obvious, why the majority of normal people need something to believe in.

Especially in times of need, darkness and despair.

The problems with religion stem from religion being used as an excuse. As I said the other day, look at the crusades for example. The English Christian soliders tear across continents "educating" the savages! Extremism and findamentalism are the problem, old grannies who find comfort in religion are fine by me.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2006 | 01:45 PM
  #12  
TelBoy's Avatar
TelBoy
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 80,907
Likes: 0
From: God's promised land
Default

Originally Posted by Leslie
He makes a very one sided argument designed to appeal to whose who are looking for an excuse for the fact that they don't want to believe in religion because it would be inconvenient to their life style.
Les WHY do you trot this one out on EVERY religious thread. For the umpteenth time, i, and millions like me, are *perfectly* capable of leading a moral life without the need for "higher" intervention. It has NOTHING to do with convenience. Nothing. And for a third time, nothing. It has everything to do with being in independent personal control of ethics and morals as human beings. How many times does it have to be repeated before you accept it as a possibility???
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2006 | 01:50 PM
  #13  
RichWalk's Avatar
RichWalk
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 17,450
Likes: 0
From: "Comfortably Numb" since Aug 2003
Default

The so called 'moderates' in many parts of America, are a terrifying prospect, as he alluded, 'Christian Facism', "say hello to George Bush your spiritual and political leader here on Earth"
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2006 | 03:05 PM
  #14  
jonc's Avatar
jonc
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 7,647
Likes: 22
Default

IMO any form of religion just is an ancient form of controlling the general population, to provide guidence and a basic set of rules for people to follow and to instill fear in those who do not conform to this beleif system. Religion on the whole has less relevence in the modern world with scientific facts and law replacing religious ideology.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2006 | 03:20 PM
  #15  
Daz34's Avatar
Daz34
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 10,641
Likes: 0
From: here
Default

As has been said why do you need to follow a religion to have a strong moral code? I do so, because I know the difference between right and wrong (whether that is gained through a posteriori or a priori knowledge is another matter) and not because I expect some kind of reward in an afterlife.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2006 | 04:23 PM
  #16  
turbotroll's Avatar
turbotroll
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Default

A lot of these people subscribe to dominion theology, kingdom now & other beliefs such as Joel's army. The aim - to take over the world in the name of God, including politically. These people are not 'fundamentalists', as their beliefs aren't at the core of Christianity. Fundamentalists don't try to change the State, prime example; Christ himself did not rail against the state, but the Sanhedrin for their blindness & hypocrisy. Christ taught to live peaceably with all men & to preach the gospel in love, not at the end of a rifle, or through over-throwing, or taking over governments. He couldn't have made it clearer by stating that his kingdom 'was not of this world'.
I know quite a lot about this subject as I was raised in a Christian home, although I'm still 'out there' as to what I believe.
In the documentary (which I missed), did Dawkins ever touch on the subject of Religion being a product of evolution?
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2006 | 05:58 PM
  #17  
OllyK's Avatar
OllyK
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 12,304
Likes: 0
From: Derbyshire
Default

Interesting program, but I don't think Dawkins got his point over very well.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2006 | 06:04 PM
  #18  
New_scooby_04's Avatar
New_scooby_04
Moderator
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 18,687
Likes: 0
From: The Terry Crews of moderation. P P P P P P POWER!!
Default

Deytooooooookurrrrrgods!!

Ns04
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2006 | 07:56 PM
  #19  
popeye's Avatar
popeye
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 447
Likes: 0
From: cuddly wobbly jelly land
Post

The bloke was spot on but he couldn't argue his way out of a paper bag. Speaks to 2 complete idiots and gets trashed by them both.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2006 | 09:08 PM
  #20  
GaryCat's Avatar
GaryCat
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Apr 1999
Posts: 2,044
Likes: 0
Default

He raised an interesting point that no matter how devout the Muslims, Jews or Christians were, they were atheist with regard to Ra, Apollo, Thor, Aphrodite etc. Why should their God have more credibility than the Roman, Greek, Norse or Egyptian Gods?

Excellent program in my opinion and this views are very similar to mine.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2006 | 09:10 PM
  #21  
GaryCat's Avatar
GaryCat
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Apr 1999
Posts: 2,044
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by popeye
The bloke was spot on but he couldn't argue his way out of a paper bag. Speaks to 2 complete idiots and gets trashed by them both.
How can you argue against such self-rightous arrogant imbeciles? They are with God so they are right! Full stop! End of Argument!
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
andy97
Computer & Technology Related
12
Sep 16, 2015 08:07 PM
RonaldoH
Southern (England)
15
Jul 20, 2001 10:50 AM
barge
Non Scooby Related
7
Dec 6, 2000 10:12 PM




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:25 AM.