quality 'in-the-ear' headphones
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Throwing myself down a mountain at every opportunity...
Posts: 6,794
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
quality 'in-the-ear' headphones
All,
I want to get some decent headphones because the standard ipod ones are a) crap, b) break regularly and c) crap.
does anybody have any suggestions, budget around £50 although I might go slightly higher if it is really worthwhile.
second question being, is it really worthwhile getting approaching reference quality headphones for a digital music player?
cheers
Ed
I want to get some decent headphones because the standard ipod ones are a) crap, b) break regularly and c) crap.
does anybody have any suggestions, budget around £50 although I might go slightly higher if it is really worthwhile.
second question being, is it really worthwhile getting approaching reference quality headphones for a digital music player?
cheers
Ed
#2
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Hemel Hempstead
Posts: 7,953
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
IMHO no real need to spend massive bucks on inner-ear headphones, they are limited in quality buy their size. I replace my ipod headphones with Sony MDR-EX71 (in white of course) and they are nothing short of stunning! Bass is amazing from the ear buds, superb clarity and very reasonable cost, I got mine about 2 years ago and payed just north of £50 for them, these days you can buy them from power-sellers on ebay for £25 + postage (I actualy bought another pair for my brother last week).
That would be my reccomendation, if you want top top top quality sound (well as good as you can reproduce with an MP3 player) then you should look at some of the noise canceling headphones from bose etc, these have a good rep.
HTH
Paul
That would be my reccomendation, if you want top top top quality sound (well as good as you can reproduce with an MP3 player) then you should look at some of the noise canceling headphones from bose etc, these have a good rep.
HTH
Paul
#3
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Surrey, UK
Posts: 8,384
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by POC
IMHO
Ed - also take a look at the Shure earphones, s'posed to be very good, a few mates have them.
#4
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: on my own!
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by POC
IMHO no real need to spend massive bucks on inner-ear headphones, they are limited in quality buy their size. I replace my ipod headphones with Sony MDR-EX71 (in white of course) and they are nothing short of stunning! Bass is amazing from the ear buds, superb clarity and very reasonable cost, I got mine about 2 years ago and payed just north of £50 for them, these days you can buy them from power-sellers on ebay for £25 + postage (I actualy bought another pair for my brother last week).
That would be my reccomendation, if you want top top top quality sound (well as good as you can reproduce with an MP3 player) then you should look at some of the noise canceling headphones from bose etc, these have a good rep.
HTH
Paul
That would be my reccomendation, if you want top top top quality sound (well as good as you can reproduce with an MP3 player) then you should look at some of the noise canceling headphones from bose etc, these have a good rep.
HTH
Paul
#6
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: At Home
Posts: 1,131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by delbert
i have the same ones in black and got to say they are the best ive had, dont fall out when you run and sound superb also cheap about £30 quid im told .
Also have these and paid circa £30 from Dixons at Heathrow AP. Excellent sound.
#7
There is no doubt that the Sonys are a great job for £25ish from Amazon. They give a good balanced sound but are a bit bloated at the bottom end to cover up for that fact that there is no real low frequencies. However, for general listening they are probably the best out there. I use them on the bus/plane etc. and enjoy my listening. Also they are not so good that they make MP3 compression sound really bad, sometimes a good thing. Certainly worth a buy.
If you want something that is really good and approaches reference quality then the Etymotic ER4P are well worth the money. They really are in a different league to the Sonys and providing you have uncompressed audio on your portable player and it has a good quality output stage then you will get a cracking sound from them. The frequency response is much more balanced than the Sonys, much better HF response almost like a set of ATCs, and they go lower without the need to give the bass a wee lift to cover anything up. The catch is the cost which is about £170 from Amazon I think. However, assuming a source with uncompressed audio and a good quality output stage you will have to go a long way to beat this combination. I mostly use them at home/work just because they can be a wee bit less easy to use than the Sonys. I personally think they are a very clever bit of kit indeed and most of those spending up to, say, £20,000 on hi-fi would do well to listen to an iPod, for example, and a pair of Etymotics (total £500ish) just to see what technology can do over old fashioned marketing hype. The monitors I will listen to this afternoon cost more than a good house and in all honesty are not that far removed from the abilities of the Etymotics. I suppose you just need to see if you can justify the cost, also remember they are a bit fiddly to use on the bus etc. which is the main reason I also have the Sonys.
If you want something that is really good and approaches reference quality then the Etymotic ER4P are well worth the money. They really are in a different league to the Sonys and providing you have uncompressed audio on your portable player and it has a good quality output stage then you will get a cracking sound from them. The frequency response is much more balanced than the Sonys, much better HF response almost like a set of ATCs, and they go lower without the need to give the bass a wee lift to cover anything up. The catch is the cost which is about £170 from Amazon I think. However, assuming a source with uncompressed audio and a good quality output stage you will have to go a long way to beat this combination. I mostly use them at home/work just because they can be a wee bit less easy to use than the Sonys. I personally think they are a very clever bit of kit indeed and most of those spending up to, say, £20,000 on hi-fi would do well to listen to an iPod, for example, and a pair of Etymotics (total £500ish) just to see what technology can do over old fashioned marketing hype. The monitors I will listen to this afternoon cost more than a good house and in all honesty are not that far removed from the abilities of the Etymotics. I suppose you just need to see if you can justify the cost, also remember they are a bit fiddly to use on the bus etc. which is the main reason I also have the Sonys.
Trending Topics
#8
Scooby Regular
Join Date: May 2000
Location: MY00,MY01,RX-8, Alfa 147 & Focus ST :-)
Posts: 10,371
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Shure E2c - the dogs Bs for about 60 quid. Proper noise cancelling headphones, that sound great and don't annoy everyone else on the tube because the sound is directed into the ear and doesn't leak out of the back like the crappy standard iPod ones.
Shure E2c link
Shure E2c link
#9
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Throwing myself down a mountain at every opportunity...
Posts: 6,794
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Chris L
Shure E2c - the dogs Bs for about 60 quid. Proper noise cancelling headphones, that sound great and don't annoy everyone else on the tube because the sound is directed into the ear and doesn't leak out of the back like the crappy standard iPod ones.
Shure E2c link
Shure E2c link
#10
Scooby Regular
I have the Etymotic ER-6, great earphones. Listened to a pair or ER-4s and they were even better, perfect for tube/train/plane with the noise cancelling.
#11
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
4th vote for the Sonys - I have the SE equivelents, and they are the nicest sounding (non expensive) in-ears I have heard.
Maybe a touch lacking on top end, but the actual presence of some bass more than makes up for it (rather than non at all like most others - even if it's a little boomy).
Certainly makes tinny in-earphones a thing of the past.
Maybe a touch lacking on top end, but the actual presence of some bass more than makes up for it (rather than non at all like most others - even if it's a little boomy).
Certainly makes tinny in-earphones a thing of the past.
Last edited by ALi-B; 09 January 2006 at 01:24 PM.
#12
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Throwing myself down a mountain at every opportunity...
Posts: 6,794
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Chris L
Shure E2c - the dogs Bs for about 60 quid. Proper noise cancelling headphones, that sound great and don't annoy everyone else on the tube because the sound is directed into the ear and doesn't leak out of the back like the crappy standard iPod ones.
Shure E2c link
Shure E2c link
#14
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Throwing myself down a mountain at every opportunity...
Posts: 6,794
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by paulr
There was a v-good thread about 1 year ago in computer related on this subject.
#15
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Throwing myself down a mountain at every opportunity...
Posts: 6,794
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#16
The review for the Sonys' is very poor with regards to quality these days. I ended up getting some Koss Spart Plug Metalics. Very good, but are difficult to posistion correctly.
See reviews etc here:http://www.advancedmp3players.co.uk/...ex.php?cPath=6
See reviews etc here:http://www.advancedmp3players.co.uk/...ex.php?cPath=6
#18
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: house in a street on the earth
Posts: 1,028
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Shure E2c are quality headphones and certainly the best for the money and better than most others I have heard. Winning awards as well with good punchy bass...
Andy
Andy
#21
Scooby Regular
Join Date: May 2000
Location: MY00,MY01,RX-8, Alfa 147 & Focus ST :-)
Posts: 10,371
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sorry Ed - just catching up with this thread. The bass response is very good - as long as you make sure that the earphones are in your ear correctly. Sounds daft I know, but it can make a big difference. The Shure headphones come with a number of adaptors, so take a bit of time and find the ones that best suit the size and shape of your ear.
Chris
Chris
#24
Originally Posted by Nick
Another vote for Shure E2Cs. Excellent sound quality & good bass response from my Rio Karma.
whatever you do though - BE CAREFUL - it may seem like one of these crappy things people say but listning for a long time with too much volume ( esp washy trebley hi-hats/percussion ) will give you tinitus - a ringing in your ears and if you do that for about 5 years you'll end up going deaf...
#25
Originally Posted by flynnstudio
whatever you do though - BE CAREFUL - it may seem like one of these crappy things people say but listning for a long time with too much volume ( esp washy trebley hi-hats/percussion ) will give you tinitus - a ringing in your ears and if you do that for about 5 years you'll end up going deaf...
One advantage of the in ear earphones is that many offer some isolation from the outside world and so can actually allow you to play the music at a lower level than might normally be the case. With this in mind it is worth thinking about the level at which you are playing the music and it really is worth taking care. Also you don't need to do it for 5 years, I have worked with people who have lost frequency response performance much more quickly than that so enjoy your music and be sensible, try to listen at the lowest suitable level rather than at the highest.
A useful, though flawed, experiment can be to listen to some solo piano and set the level to that you would expect to experience sitting in a concert hall with a live acoustic solo piano. Then try some of your other music at this level. I know it doesn't take into account the possibility that your audio is recorded at different levels etc. but even so it is good for awareness.
As I've said, most of all enjoy the music as that is the main thing but keep in mind that you want to enjoy it for a lot of years yet.
#26
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Throwing myself down a mountain at every opportunity...
Posts: 6,794
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
FYI just found this useful review which includes most of the headphones mentioned in this thread
http://www.avreview.co.uk/news/artic...98515328321276
http://www.avreview.co.uk/news/artic...98515328321276
#28
I got the worse ear ringing I ever had with these things - it's not natural to listen to music in an ear-canal vacuum - they just don't allow your ears to breathe - awful things......just make sure you've got a returns policy just in case... ...
of course you know this isn't the end of it - next you'll be looking for a nice headphone amplifier and a good set of audiophile cans - NOW that's when you start to get REAL BASS!.
of course you know this isn't the end of it - next you'll be looking for a nice headphone amplifier and a good set of audiophile cans - NOW that's when you start to get REAL BASS!.
#30
I cant give a report on that but I have the MX450s & have just brought the EX71s! Both are far better than the standard IPOD ones I had
The ex71s are far better ! They fit in my ear better & cut out exterior sound Plus have a fuller depth of sound with more bass !
One down side is the short standard wire & the stupid long extension one on the ex71s !
Just my opinion & no doubt others will disagree !
The ex71s are far better ! They fit in my ear better & cut out exterior sound Plus have a fuller depth of sound with more bass !
One down side is the short standard wire & the stupid long extension one on the ex71s !
Just my opinion & no doubt others will disagree !