Same sex adoption
30 December 2005, 01:00 PM
#1
BANNED
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: www.flamingmorons.co.uk
Posts: 911
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Same sex adoption
Now legal apparently 
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4568234.stm
Prepare yourselves for a new generation of f*cked up kids, brought up by freaks!
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4568234.stm
Prepare yourselves for a new generation of f*cked up kids, brought up by freaks!
30 December 2005, 01:03 PM
#5
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Arborfield, Berkshire
Posts: 12,387
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
On a serious note what is the problem? Im sure they undergo the same checks as diff sex couples. Gives the kids more chance of adoption and a better life.
Simon.
Simon.
30 December 2005, 01:04 PM
#6
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Blyth
Posts: 12,786
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by P1Fanatic
As opposed to the lovely hoodie chav kids we have roaming the streets now?
Simon.
Simon.
Trending Topics
30 December 2005, 01:08 PM
#8
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Blyth
Posts: 12,786
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
so wheres the problem in explaining? not as if they aren't goiong to find out at school anyway!!! the child will always find out it is adopted! there is nothing freaky about it! if the child is loved and looked after then where the hell is the problem?
30 December 2005, 01:09 PM
#9
Scooby Senior
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Next door to the WiFi connection
Posts: 16,293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by STi wanna Subaru
somebody find the 20 page thread on this from not long ago. can't be bothered with all that again.
LOL, a big fat SIAL this one
Got the day off work myself so not getting dragged into a debate on here, Im going watching the 40yr old virgin instead and having a few bevvies. 
30 December 2005, 01:13 PM
#11
BANNED
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: www.flamingmorons.co.uk
Posts: 911
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by ScoobywagonGl
so wheres the problem in explaining? not as if they aren't goiong to find out at school anyway!!!
there's nothing like growing up resenting your 'parents' to ensure a screwed up mind
and bringing up a child to be gay is as bad as bringing up a child to be a religious nutter in my book
30 December 2005, 01:13 PM
#12
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,985
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I appreciate that most of you never do anything wrong and so you have nothing to fear, but the following might be of interest in relation to this debate:
Freedom of speech, anyone ?
Mark Steyn - THE SPECTATOR magazine
All over the United Kingdom, right now, real crimes are being
committed: mobiles are being nicked, front doors are being kicked in,
bollards are being lobbed through bus shelters - just to name some of
the lighter activities that add so much to the gaiety of the nation.
None of these is a "priority crime", as you'll know if you've ever
endured the bureaucratic time-waster of reporting a burglary.
So what is a "priority crime"? Well, the other day, the author Lynette
Burrows went on a BBC Five Live show to talk about the government's new
"civil partnerships" and expressed her opinion - politely, no
intemperate words - that the adoption of children by homosexuals was "a
risk". The following day, Fulham police contacted her to discuss the
"homophobic incident".
A Scotland Yard spokesperson told the
Telegraph's Sally Pook that its "standard policy" for "community safety
units" is to investigate "homophobic, racist and domestic incidents"
because these are all "priority crimes" - even though, in the case of
Mrs Burrows, there is (to be boringly legalistic about these things) no
crime, as even the zealots of the Yard concede. "It is all about
reassuring the community," said the very p.c.
Plod to the Telegraph. "All parties have been spoken to by the police.
No allegation of crime has been made. A report has been taken but is
now closed."
So no crime was committed. Yet Mrs Burrows was "investigated" and a
report about the "incident"
and her involvement in it is now on a government computer somewhere.
Freedom of speech, anyone ?
Mark Steyn - THE SPECTATOR magazine
All over the United Kingdom, right now, real crimes are being
committed: mobiles are being nicked, front doors are being kicked in,
bollards are being lobbed through bus shelters - just to name some of
the lighter activities that add so much to the gaiety of the nation.
None of these is a "priority crime", as you'll know if you've ever
endured the bureaucratic time-waster of reporting a burglary.
So what is a "priority crime"? Well, the other day, the author Lynette
Burrows went on a BBC Five Live show to talk about the government's new
"civil partnerships" and expressed her opinion - politely, no
intemperate words - that the adoption of children by homosexuals was "a
risk". The following day, Fulham police contacted her to discuss the
"homophobic incident".
A Scotland Yard spokesperson told the
Telegraph's Sally Pook that its "standard policy" for "community safety
units" is to investigate "homophobic, racist and domestic incidents"
because these are all "priority crimes" - even though, in the case of
Mrs Burrows, there is (to be boringly legalistic about these things) no
crime, as even the zealots of the Yard concede. "It is all about
reassuring the community," said the very p.c.
Plod to the Telegraph. "All parties have been spoken to by the police.
No allegation of crime has been made. A report has been taken but is
now closed."
So no crime was committed. Yet Mrs Burrows was "investigated" and a
report about the "incident"
and her involvement in it is now on a government computer somewhere.
30 December 2005, 01:16 PM
#14
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 16,517
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by davegtt
LOL, a big fat SIAL this one Got the day off work myself so not getting dragged into a debate on here, Im going watching the 40yr old virgin instead and having a few bevvies.
Got the day off work myself so not getting dragged into a debate on here, Im going watching the 40yr old virgin instead and having a few bevvies. but I was right
30 December 2005, 01:35 PM
#17
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,785
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Im sorry but being an 18 year old lad, the idea of being brought up by two same sex parents is completely disturbing.
Now before anyone accuses me of being homophobic, I do have quite a few friends who are gay/lesbian and often hang out with them in their environments.
But to be brought up by a gay couple is just wrong, I know it would screw my head completely and to be honest 14 years of ridicule at school wouldnt go down to well either. Because there is no doubt about it, kids will be bullied over it.
The problem appears to be that the laws are going towards the rights of those that can adopt rather then those that are being adopted.
Now before anyone accuses me of being homophobic, I do have quite a few friends who are gay/lesbian and often hang out with them in their environments.
But to be brought up by a gay couple is just wrong, I know it would screw my head completely and to be honest 14 years of ridicule at school wouldnt go down to well either. Because there is no doubt about it, kids will be bullied over it.
The problem appears to be that the laws are going towards the rights of those that can adopt rather then those that are being adopted.
30 December 2005, 01:44 PM
#22
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by RedFive
Well, it's legal now so stop whining
30 December 2005, 01:50 PM
#24
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Blyth
Posts: 12,786
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Slartibartfast
Are you queer? If not why are you so f**king delighted with it? Perverts for parents? Think what these poor children will have to suffer. Makes me shudder.
30 December 2005, 02:19 PM
#27
BANNED
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: www.flamingmorons.co.uk
Posts: 911
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
what are they going to tell their kids then? The birds and the bees:
"well son, when a daddy loves another daddy very much he puts his ***** in daddy's bottom, unless they want a baby in which case they go down the adoption centre and pick up a kid that has been made the old fashioned way"
"what's the old fashioned way daddy?"
"thats when a daddy loves a mummy instead"
"why haven't I got a mummy daddy?"
"don't be homophobic son!"
"well son, when a daddy loves another daddy very much he puts his ***** in daddy's bottom, unless they want a baby in which case they go down the adoption centre and pick up a kid that has been made the old fashioned way"
"what's the old fashioned way daddy?"
"thats when a daddy loves a mummy instead"
"why haven't I got a mummy daddy?"
"don't be homophobic son!"
30 December 2005, 02:32 PM
#29
Better to have a child in a caring same sex environment than unwanted and in a children's home. Priority should go to 'normal' couples who want to adopt IMHO, but I expect that there simply aren't enough of them to go round!
Suresh
Suresh
30 December 2005, 02:39 PM
#30
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Poor Guy
this country is going to be one f**ked up place in 20years times.
"It's 2006 don't be so old fashioned" - old fashioned, or just a moral person with standards....??
Give it 100 years and murder will be legal. "You're right to kill".
No standards anymore.