Could Huntley have been stopped earlier on?
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Disco, Disco!
Posts: 21,825
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Could Huntley have been stopped earlier on?
Came across this
http://uk.news.yahoo.com/26092005/35...y-stopped.html
Worth a read and have a look at the video - work safe.
What a shame this was not acted on back in '98
http://uk.news.yahoo.com/26092005/35...y-stopped.html
Worth a read and have a look at the video - work safe.
What a shame this was not acted on back in '98
#3
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Croydon (ish)
Posts: 1,887
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have to say I find this video now surfacing suspicious. Wonder how much she was paid?
What irritated me about this case was how all the media jumped on the Police saying he had been investigated before. So why was he working in a School?
Something the Tabloids seem to miss, is the "Innocent until proven guilty" Huntley was never convicted on any of the alledged assaults. So clearly the evidence never stood up to much. DNA testing was availiable, but failed to produce anything. For all we know she may have cried rape when it was a one night stand and she felt guilty the next morning.
But now, they (media) want the law changed to take into account allegations rather than proof. No douby they'll also rally around people for "Police tampering with evidence and incompetence lead to a mis-carriage of justice"
The FACTS are simple. Nearly all crimes can be seen with Hindsight. Look at 9/11 look at London bombings. But when there is no immediate proof what are you supposed to do? Make it up?
What irritated me about this case was how all the media jumped on the Police saying he had been investigated before. So why was he working in a School?
Something the Tabloids seem to miss, is the "Innocent until proven guilty" Huntley was never convicted on any of the alledged assaults. So clearly the evidence never stood up to much. DNA testing was availiable, but failed to produce anything. For all we know she may have cried rape when it was a one night stand and she felt guilty the next morning.
But now, they (media) want the law changed to take into account allegations rather than proof. No douby they'll also rally around people for "Police tampering with evidence and incompetence lead to a mis-carriage of justice"
The FACTS are simple. Nearly all crimes can be seen with Hindsight. Look at 9/11 look at London bombings. But when there is no immediate proof what are you supposed to do? Make it up?
Last edited by rr_ww; 26 September 2005 at 06:24 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
fatboy_coach
General Technical
15
18 June 2016 03:48 PM
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
28
28 December 2015 11:07 PM