Legal help required (speeding)
#1
Legal help required (speeding)
Can anyone point me towards something to help my sister-in-law fight a speeding charge case.
She has today recieved a summons for doing 41 in a 30 mph zone, but the offence was in january this year. I thought that any summons/charge had to be made in 2 weeks of the offence.
We do not know who mwas driving, could be Her, partner, father-in-law or possibly even me!?
Im really looking for the facts to help this argument.
Regards, Cliff
She has today recieved a summons for doing 41 in a 30 mph zone, but the offence was in january this year. I thought that any summons/charge had to be made in 2 weeks of the offence.
We do not know who mwas driving, could be Her, partner, father-in-law or possibly even me!?
Im really looking for the facts to help this argument.
Regards, Cliff
#2
A NIP needs to be sent to the Registered Keeper within 14 days of the offence.
The information summons for a speeding offence has to laid with the magistrates court within six months but you could be notified outside that.
Has she any NIP, COFPs or any reminders from the Police force dealing with it?
The information summons for a speeding offence has to laid with the magistrates court within six months but you could be notified outside that.
Has she any NIP, COFPs or any reminders from the Police force dealing with it?
#3
All she has recieved is a NIP today for this offence.
Unfortunately it appears not to be so clear cut after a phone conversation just now It seems she hadnt changed her address on the V5 until feb05 after moving, so its possible this letter has done the rounds
Unfortunately it appears not to be so clear cut after a phone conversation just now It seems she hadnt changed her address on the V5 until feb05 after moving, so its possible this letter has done the rounds
#4
So was it a NIP or summons she's recieved today? They are very much different things!
If the V5 record hasn't been updated or it's company car / van, then the 14 days tends to go out the window.
If the V5 record hasn't been updated or it's company car / van, then the 14 days tends to go out the window.
#6
That makes more sense.
Now wonder over to Pepipoo and read the topic called "We Can’t Recall Who Was Driving" in the "Read This First" forum.
You'll need to exercise diligence in trying to work out who was driving (ie ask for photo's, check on petrol receipts or similar, work logs and more) but it is a valid defence.
Edit...
The other option is to drag your heels. What was the date of the offence? I'd presume she has 28 days to respond to the NIP she now has. If she was to nominate you as the driver at the very end of the 28 days, then you should recieve a NIP with another 28 days to respond. That must take you close to the six months (ie you send your NIP back and probably get a Fixed Penalty offer but you could ignore this as it would expire after the six months to lay a summons). Worth checking this path on Pepipoo.
Chris.
Now wonder over to Pepipoo and read the topic called "We Can’t Recall Who Was Driving" in the "Read This First" forum.
You'll need to exercise diligence in trying to work out who was driving (ie ask for photo's, check on petrol receipts or similar, work logs and more) but it is a valid defence.
Edit...
The other option is to drag your heels. What was the date of the offence? I'd presume she has 28 days to respond to the NIP she now has. If she was to nominate you as the driver at the very end of the 28 days, then you should recieve a NIP with another 28 days to respond. That must take you close to the six months (ie you send your NIP back and probably get a Fixed Penalty offer but you could ignore this as it would expire after the six months to lay a summons). Worth checking this path on Pepipoo.
Chris.
Last edited by ChrisB; 26 May 2005 at 02:45 PM.
#7
Originally Posted by v5 man
It seems she hadnt changed her address on the V5 until feb05 after moving, so its possible this letter has done the rounds
Good luck with the case.
Trending Topics
#8
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Newport, Gwent
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by rossi_p
I maybe wrong, and I hope so, but I thought a fine of up to £1000 can be charged if you fail to notify the DVLA of an address change for your licence/registration/insurance etc.
Good luck with the case.
Good luck with the case.
I was taken to court for a double white lines offence a few years ago (I was speeding, but the lone officer couldn't do me for that, so made out I straddled double white lines)
I was found guilty and had to surrender my licence for the points to be applied. My licence (the old paper type) was in about 6 pieces (after going through the washing machine) and was about 2 addresses old.
They sent my licence back (to my new address), with the points hand written on (presumably it couldn't go through their machines). They didn't question the different address on the licence.
Maybe I was just lucky
#9
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: berkshire
Posts: 893
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
hey cliff. send the letter you got back to them and dont sign it.
when they send it back saying please sign it. dont sign it and send it back. it may sound stupid but you arent admitting liability and they wont bother you again(apart from the fact you dont know who is driving,how do they?!
i have got away with this 3 times previous and so has my dad once in my old car!
also my cousin got a letter for the same offence and told the police she wasnt driving and didnt know the drivers details,again it was dropped.
when they send it back saying please sign it. dont sign it and send it back. it may sound stupid but you arent admitting liability and they wont bother you again(apart from the fact you dont know who is driving,how do they?!
i have got away with this 3 times previous and so has my dad once in my old car!
also my cousin got a letter for the same offence and told the police she wasnt driving and didnt know the drivers details,again it was dropped.
#10
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Muppetising life
Posts: 15,449
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by C 8HEP
hey cliff. send the letter you got back to them and dont sign it.
when they send it back saying please sign it. dont sign it and send it back. it may sound stupid but you arent admitting liability and they wont bother you again(apart from the fact you dont know who is driving,how do they?!
i have got away with this 3 times previous and so has my dad once in my old car!
also my cousin got a letter for the same offence and told the police she wasnt driving and didnt know the drivers details,again it was dropped.
when they send it back saying please sign it. dont sign it and send it back. it may sound stupid but you arent admitting liability and they wont bother you again(apart from the fact you dont know who is driving,how do they?!
i have got away with this 3 times previous and so has my dad once in my old car!
also my cousin got a letter for the same offence and told the police she wasnt driving and didnt know the drivers details,again it was dropped.
#13
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: house in a street on the earth
Posts: 1,028
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Also, the 'don;t know who was driving' issue just gets reverted back to the owner of the car and they are liable regardless. That will never wash anymore...
#14
If you do not declare the driver they will issue an MS90 code fine on your licence.
This is 3 points and whatever the fine for the original offence will be.
I have one on my licence and received 3 penalty points and a 260 GBP fine. Insurance companies aren't too keen on this one.
This is 3 points and whatever the fine for the original offence will be.
I have one on my licence and received 3 penalty points and a 260 GBP fine. Insurance companies aren't too keen on this one.
#15
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
What date is on the NIP of the alleged offence in January?
Your sister isnt that far away from timing this out due to the 6 month rule.
Firstly visit WWW.Pepipoo.com and join the fightback forum, post her situation in the judicial section.
She will have 28 days to plan her strategy of defence.
Personally I would request photos by writing this simple letter
" Please would you supply photographic evidence to help identify the driver".
Send this letter in 2-3 weeks time from now by special delivery. When she receives the photos, they might identify her, in which case she can do several things.
1 give in and pay up- that is what the scammers are hoping
2 fight the allegation. lots of fun if done correctly
I believe there is a good chance it could time out, post her details on pepipoo
Andy
Your sister isnt that far away from timing this out due to the 6 month rule.
Firstly visit WWW.Pepipoo.com and join the fightback forum, post her situation in the judicial section.
She will have 28 days to plan her strategy of defence.
Personally I would request photos by writing this simple letter
" Please would you supply photographic evidence to help identify the driver".
Send this letter in 2-3 weeks time from now by special delivery. When she receives the photos, they might identify her, in which case she can do several things.
1 give in and pay up- that is what the scammers are hoping
2 fight the allegation. lots of fun if done correctly
I believe there is a good chance it could time out, post her details on pepipoo
Andy
#16
Originally Posted by mightyyid
Also, the 'don;t know who was driving' issue just gets reverted back to the owner of the car and they are liable regardless. That will never wash anymore...
#17
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by ChrisB
That's rubbish. If you can show reasonable diligence in trying to work out who was driving and are unable to decide, then subsection 4 of s172 is your "friend". A poster on Pepipoo was found not guilty on ss. 4 this week (23rd May 05).
Dave
#18
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
Para4 S172 RTA is probably the most sucessful defence if you genuinely dont know who was driving and can prove reasonable diligence( this for the registered keepr only-see Mohindra ruling regarding keeper).
Andy
Visit www.pepipoo.com for legal defences against NIPs and other traffic violations
Andy
Visit www.pepipoo.com for legal defences against NIPs and other traffic violations
#20
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: South Bucks
Posts: 17,732
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Cliff - Bad news!
If it was a Camera - you want to ask for the pictorial evidence. Worst case scenario it might identify you as sitting in the back .......
I think you are facing some large potential legal costs if you decide to fight it - so take some legal advice if you want to do this.
On the flip side - it's probably only going to be 3 points and a £50-100 fine so why not just get the one who does the least driving to plead guilty?
Try here for advice: Speed Trap Bible
If it was a Camera - you want to ask for the pictorial evidence. Worst case scenario it might identify you as sitting in the back .......
I think you are facing some large potential legal costs if you decide to fight it - so take some legal advice if you want to do this.
On the flip side - it's probably only going to be 3 points and a £50-100 fine so why not just get the one who does the least driving to plead guilty?
Try here for advice: Speed Trap Bible
#21
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
Originally Posted by Neil W
What is NIP? Is this a speed camera offence.
Also is the 14 day rule correct - i.e. can I stop worrying after this sunday?
Also is the 14 day rule correct - i.e. can I stop worrying after this sunday?
You can also be given a verbal nip if you are stopped by the police.
See part of RTA 1988 below
1.—(1) Subject to section 2 of this Act, where a person is prosecuted for an offence to which this section applies, he is not to be convicted unless—
Andy
#22
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
On the flip side - it's probably only going to be 3 points and a £50-100 fine so why not just get the one who does the least driving to plead guilty?
Section 172 RTA 1988
(4) A person shall not be guilty of an offence by virtue of paragraph (a) of subsection (2) above if he shows that he did not know and could not with reasonable diligence have ascertained who the driver of the vehicle was.
Andy
#23
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: house in a street on the earth
Posts: 1,028
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by ChrisB
That's rubbish. If you can show reasonable diligence in trying to work out who was driving and are unable to decide, then subsection 4 of s172 is your "friend". A poster on Pepipoo was found not guilty on ss. 4 this week (23rd May 05).
#24
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: I've joined the Focus family
Posts: 7,623
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As regards the serving of the NIP. If it was sent to the registered keepers address within the 14 days of the offence, it will be deemed as being 'served'. Therefore, if it was sent to your Sister-in-Laws old address within the 14 days, it has been served in time. It's just taken a while for them to do a further check and found out about the change of address.
Same thing applies to rental, leased and company cars. As long as the NIP has been sent to the appropriate compnay within the 14 days, they have satisfied the requirements.
Hope thats put some light on the subject.
Same thing applies to rental, leased and company cars. As long as the NIP has been sent to the appropriate compnay within the 14 days, they have satisfied the requirements.
Hope thats put some light on the subject.
#25
Originally Posted by mightyyid
Maybe - but what you say is also partly 'rubbish'. If you believe that everyone out there drives a car that loads of other people could be driving every day of the week, then we live in different worlds. I would say that very few people are in this situation - we have our own cars and we drive them. Sharing a car used as a taxi with 5 other drivers - fair enough, but the majority of people own and drive their own cars or driver their provided company car - and not a lot else. Of course I could be wrong, but I'm sure you'll put me right so eloquently...
#26
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: evesham, worcester
Posts: 1,253
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Adidas
As regards the serving of the NIP. If it was sent to the registered keepers address within the 14 days of the offence, it will be deemed as being 'served'. Therefore, if it was sent to your Sister-in-Laws old address within the 14 days, it has been served in time. It's just taken a while for them to do a further check and found out about the change of address.
Same thing applies to rental, leased and company cars. As long as the NIP has been sent to the appropriate compnay within the 14 days, they have satisfied the requirements.
Hope thats put some light on the subject.
Same thing applies to rental, leased and company cars. As long as the NIP has been sent to the appropriate compnay within the 14 days, they have satisfied the requirements.
Hope thats put some light on the subject.
is that 14 days including the weekends or 14 working days??
also what if you are on holiday for 3 weeks or so and are not there to sign for the recorded delivery??
#27
Originally Posted by v5 man
Can anyone point me towards something to help my sister-in-law fight a speeding charge case.
She has today recieved a summons for doing 41 in a 30 mph zone, but the offence was in january this year. I thought that any summons/charge had to be made in 2 weeks of the offence.
We do not know who mwas driving, could be Her, partner, father-in-law or possibly even me!?
Im really looking for the facts to help this argument.
Regards, Cliff
She has today recieved a summons for doing 41 in a 30 mph zone, but the offence was in january this year. I thought that any summons/charge had to be made in 2 weeks of the offence.
We do not know who mwas driving, could be Her, partner, father-in-law or possibly even me!?
Im really looking for the facts to help this argument.
Regards, Cliff
silly man for driving loaned car too fast or silly girl for thinking driving own car too fast could be planted on other person
The law be broken. Someone has to pay.
#28
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: I've joined the Focus family
Posts: 7,623
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by gljam
is that 14 days including the weekends or 14 working days??
also what if you are on holiday for 3 weeks or so and are not there to sign for the recorded delivery??
also what if you are on holiday for 3 weeks or so and are not there to sign for the recorded delivery??
2) Weekends are irrelevent
3) No longer have to be sent recorded delivery. As long as it was sent 1st class.
BTW, if the offence is serious enough, a 'protected' summons can be sworn out and that can last forever. Very rarely used, if ever
HTH
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
28
28 December 2015 11:07 PM
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
12
18 November 2015 07:03 AM