Notices
Non Scooby Related Anything Non-Scooby related

Speed cameras "increase crashes"

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 14 April 2005, 05:49 PM
  #1  
hedgehog
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
hedgehog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,985
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Speed cameras "increase crashes"

Interesting that some are starting to catch on:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/l...re/4003367.stm
Old 14 April 2005, 07:21 PM
  #3  
AndyC_772
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
AndyC_772's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Swilling coffee at my lab bench
Posts: 9,096
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Actually that's not necessarily the case; the automatic signs that simply flash up the speed limit if they detect you're exceeding it are much cheaper than GATSOs (about £7000 vs £30000) and have actually been shown to be more effective at slowing people down too.

Some people won't be happy unless drivers are being prosecuted, but for the rest of us, a shift towards these signs and away from cameras can only be a good thing.
Old 14 April 2005, 07:29 PM
  #4  
Scooby-Mark
Scooby Regular
 
Scooby-Mark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 1,640
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I totaly agree, I saw something on the telly the other night where a guy from the institute of advanced motorists was saying that speed cameras caused drivers to look at their speedos more often then normal, I think most drivers would respond to the flashing reminder of the speed and wouldn't cause people to slam the brakes on for fear of procsecution !!
Old 14 April 2005, 07:34 PM
  #5  
hedgehog
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
hedgehog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,985
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

If the Lancs partneship ceases to be self funding then it is underwritten 40% by Lancs County Council, 40% by the Lancs police and 20% by two smaller councils.

So, if 3.6 million people per year stop paying their speeding fines then your local partnership will be paid for by your council (i.e. you) and your local police (i.e. you, plus fewer police on the beat.) There is absolutely no contingency plan for "winding up" the partnership and so it would seem that there is no intention to wind it up should, say, every motorist in the country start driving around at 15mph. In that situation speed limits would just be reduced to 10mph.

With this in mind the speeding penalty is literally a stealth tax as if you were not paying for the anti-car partnership through your fines then you would be paying for it through direct taxation. You pay for a wide range of other anti-car lobby groups, such as Transport 2000, through direct taxation but I don't think your local council would like having to increase your bills just because they couldn't persecute enough motorists.

This is just why the fight against the anti-car lobby is a political struggle and why this coming few weeks are very important to all of us. Make your point to your politicians NOW because the anti-car lobby is well ahead of the game and it will take grass roots, rather than party political, politics to defeat them.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JimBowen
ICE
5
02 July 2023 01:54 PM
KAS35RSTI
Subaru
27
04 November 2021 07:12 PM
BLU
Computer & Technology Related
11
02 October 2015 12:53 PM
Ganz1983
Subaru
5
02 October 2015 09:22 AM
Sub-Subaru
General Technical
1
28 September 2015 12:47 PM



Quick Reply: Speed cameras "increase crashes"



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:43 AM.