Collateral
26 January 2005, 12:40 PM
#4
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Lurkin Somewhere
Posts: 7,951
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
nar this one
http://www.play.com/play247.asp?pa=m...2&title=502833
Didnt you think the end was, kinda ****!
http://www.play.com/play247.asp?pa=m...2&title=502833
Didnt you think the end was, kinda ****!
Trending Topics
26 January 2005, 01:01 PM
#13
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sheffield; Rome of the North
Posts: 17,582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Watched it last night actually; IMO its OK but its not as good as the first one and theyre both way short of the books that inspired them.
Simon
Simon
26 January 2005, 01:08 PM
#16
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 337
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Was it just me or did Cruise in the close ups of his face sometimes have the Japanease Cinamatic look to him in this film. Hair style and sun glasses etc. The ending was a bit dried up and sudden.
26 January 2005, 01:23 PM
#18
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Lurkin Somewhere
Posts: 7,951
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by blueone
Was it just me or did Cruise in the close ups of his face sometimes have the Japanease Cinamatic look to him in this film. Hair style and sun glasses etc. The ending was a bit dried up and sudden.
26 January 2005, 01:34 PM
#19
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: England
Posts: 18,358
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thought the story was good but a little predictable towards the end. Tom Cruise doesn't come across as cool in a way that, say, Leon did.
The thing that really got me going and I may be missing the point here, was the camera work. Especially at the beginning, the camera was shaky, the subject matter was never centered and the editing didn't flow (as in the camera was panning right to left following a car it would then cut to a scene panning from top to bottom) It just annoyed me barely 10 minutes in.
The thing that really got me going and I may be missing the point here, was the camera work. Especially at the beginning, the camera was shaky, the subject matter was never centered and the editing didn't flow (as in the camera was panning right to left following a car it would then cut to a scene panning from top to bottom) It just annoyed me barely 10 minutes in.
26 January 2005, 01:38 PM
#21
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Lurkin Somewhere
Posts: 7,951
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i thought the camera angles were funny to!Especially near the beginning on the esculators i thought! Kind of panning around his head
26 January 2005, 01:52 PM
#23
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,152
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by PG
No.....I thought it was all **** 
:The most overrated actor on the planet.
strangely the best (most natural) performance he has given so far was as an ******* in Rain Man ???
26 January 2005, 02:07 PM
#24
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: New Milton, Hants
Posts: 424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Watched Collateral then Bourne Supremacy one after the other on a plane to US last week.
Thought Collateral was poor - poor storey line, poor acting, poor ending
Thought Bourne Supremacy was excellent
Thought Collateral was poor - poor storey line, poor acting, poor ending
Thought Bourne Supremacy was excellent
26 January 2005, 04:29 PM
#27
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 816
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It was the best film I watched at the cinema last year.I loved the way it was filmed-very stylish(all digital I think).The end wasn't great but the action and dialogue between Cruise and the cab driver was excellent.
26 January 2005, 04:40 PM
#29
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Lots of different places! (Thank you Mr. Lambert)
Posts: 3,037
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Trouble with Tom Cruise is he's never really scaled the dizzy heights of Top Gun again has he? 
I thought Collateral was no better than OK to be honest.
tiggers.
I thought Collateral was no better than OK to be honest.
tiggers.
