Hello

Coming (hopefully) to a person near you soon:



Legimate news moderators, before you delete it...

http://www.news.com.au/common/story_...E13780,00.html

 

I don't entirely see the point of wearing them, but I will have no complaints about them being available to ladies the world over.

 

I understand the reasoning but for all the covering they provide, I'd have thought that it was easier to go commando.

 

Yes I'd prefer backless, frontless and topless.

Even better backless, frontless, topless Olympic beach volleyball!!

 

Easier for everyone though jeans might chaff a bit??

 

Nah, tie-back knickers is where the real naughtiness is...

 

I've never seen the point of G strings as a form of protection. My GF only wears G strings maybe French knicks at a push but apart from looking quite sexy they do not seem that practicle. She also doesn't mind the bit that goes between the cheeks - I've tried them and kept swallowing the buggers!

 

They look like they're falling down, and probaly feel like it too... Anyway. I like the look of a proper g-string..

 

why would it be deleted



D

 

personally i have no problem with the convention g-string arrangement, clearly visible above the top of jeans and below the bottom of T shirt.

but maybe that's just me.

 

I think it is just you. Some of the mingers I've seen with two **** cheeks resembling a semi-detached aircraft hangar with the doors open and a bungee rope stretched between them is not something that I want to see too often.

 

Agreed. You see some grot trotting around the streets sometimes.

Another bad example being.....

http://www.newyork-bodyworks.com/sho.../striped-g.jpg

 

Such as this you mean??

 

Sometime I can't believe the vesthibitionism on SN.

 

Enough dude!!

 

lol @ davy boy!!!

vesthibitionism ................................... The flirtatious display of undergarments by a woman

PS - yes i did look in the dictionary!! lol

 

Sorry it was bit witzelsucht.

I'll go and xenobombulate on a different forum for a bit.

 

are you looking at the same website as me?

or are you trying to be a philosophunculist ?

 

I can never fathom the size 18 Michelin girls in low-rise jeans and short tops exposing rolls of fat midriff. For some reason they are in such denial they think it is sexy. It doesn't help that women are good boosting each their female friend's egos to the point of outrageous fabrication....

 

Sucker Pleeeeeeeeeeease!

I DO know more!

 

admittedly these are pirelli girls but i think they are still pretty fine:

 

Hello

I believe that oztokyo was referring to this kind of spectacle, that I certainly do not wish to see:



Steve.

 

ho ho

Got an email like this a while back - Paris v Romford!

Check it out:

Paris: http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v1...01uk/Paris.jpg

Romford: http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v1...uk/Romford.jpg

 

http://www.whale-tail.com/

 

Do you have nothing better to do young man????

 

Er, do you Are you stalking me Chris

Not so young these days But then again, compared to you

Do you know what you're doing tomorrow yet

 

Just spotted your name as the top post Dave...

Will have to see what I can clear first thing. If I'm up to date, let's go for it!

 

Paris - nice

Romford - I really feel that a warning needs putting on that link. Its just put me right off a piece of cheese I was just eating.

 

Well ladies you can't complain about VPL with them on

 

I feel I should defend Romford, I don't even recognise where the pic was taken, let alone the girl, not enough orange skin in the pic.

I think that pic is from 'op north', well I hope so.

Back to the original topic, the backless g doesn't look like it would work with jeans. I prefer the regular 'g'.