It just gets worse... Could this mean the end of MP3 players?
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: From Your Worst Nightmare!
Posts: 1,362
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This is complete bollocks!!!!
What do you guyes think
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/3256945.stm
What do you guyes think
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/3256945.stm
#3
Scooby Regular
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Dunfermline,Fife Xbox/PS3 Gamertag: RB5black
Posts: 4,746
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
you have to laugh.. they sell you the Technology then tell you you can't use it. don't sony Make music/DVD burners/CD burners/Blank media/MP3 players
Stupid just stupid
Stupid just stupid
#7
Guest
Posts: n/a
The only way to stop these idiots making p!ss taking laws is to protest and stop buying the material in the first place. Then see how the music industry like it when the customers turn round and say "fine you wont let me listen to my cd on my mp3 player then I wont buy your music" They think sales are low now, wait till this comes into effect and see how customers respond when they cant do anyhting with the music they buy [img]images/smilies/mad.gif[/img]
Hope the music industry goes down hill rapidly due to simple greed. Its an easy solution, stop charging ridiculous amounts for cds/games/dvds etc and cut the price by 50% and then they will stop/reduce piracy pretty much and still be making huge profits.
The music industry deserve everything they get in terms of bad sales and results due to their massive greed [img]images/smilies/mad.gif[/img]
As for the EC they can go **** themselves with their nanny laws.
Hope the music industry goes down hill rapidly due to simple greed. Its an easy solution, stop charging ridiculous amounts for cds/games/dvds etc and cut the price by 50% and then they will stop/reduce piracy pretty much and still be making huge profits.
The music industry deserve everything they get in terms of bad sales and results due to their massive greed [img]images/smilies/mad.gif[/img]
As for the EC they can go **** themselves with their nanny laws.
Trending Topics
#9
Scooby Senior
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Next door to the WiFi connection
Posts: 16,293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I cant understand how if we can copy a CD with music we like for less than a quid then why should we pay £15 for a CD knowing full well that £14 of it is profit, **** them as said above, if people stopped buying the stuff for a while they would have no choice int matter other than reducing the prices to a sensible level
#10
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: In the naughty corner
Posts: 10,869
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
WTF? Legal grey area?!
As far as I am concerned, if I have bought a CD, I have every right to play it on any damned player I like, including my PC. And, as I've paid one load of royalties and will only be listening to the music in one format at a time, I will continue to record music to MP3 and MiniDisc. I will also continue to make back-up copies of my CDs to carry in the car, as I am sick of the originals getting damaged.
I can see why they have a problem with people downloading music from the 'net, but to be honest, if they weren't such robbing rip-off merchants maybe more people would buy music.
As far as I am concerned, if I have bought a CD, I have every right to play it on any damned player I like, including my PC. And, as I've paid one load of royalties and will only be listening to the music in one format at a time, I will continue to record music to MP3 and MiniDisc. I will also continue to make back-up copies of my CDs to carry in the car, as I am sick of the originals getting damaged.
I can see why they have a problem with people downloading music from the 'net, but to be honest, if they weren't such robbing rip-off merchants maybe more people would buy music.
#11
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Lincolnshire
Posts: 15,623
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Some have pointed out that fast-forwarding through the ads at the start of a DVD now contravenes the law
They dont help themselves do they..
#12
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Essexville
Posts: 4,391
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i've got enough music to keep me happy for a while.
i would gladly pay £5 for a music cd, but £14.99 or whatever they are now???? they can **** off.
and £24 odd for a disney dvd, thay my son will frisbee across the room?? ermmm no way jose.
like the way they put a graphic of kazaa on the bbc newstory....
that should boost the old pirate downloads somewhat as well... LMFAO
BB
i would gladly pay £5 for a music cd, but £14.99 or whatever they are now???? they can **** off.
and £24 odd for a disney dvd, thay my son will frisbee across the room?? ermmm no way jose.
like the way they put a graphic of kazaa on the bbc newstory....
that should boost the old pirate downloads somewhat as well... LMFAO
BB
#13
Scooby Regular
Join Date: May 2003
Location: West Sussex
Posts: 912
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The reason I don't mind downloading songs is this. How many of us have bought an album on the strength of 1 or 2 released songs, only to find out that the other 12 tracks on the albume are sh*te ?!? I must of spent hundreds if not thousands on songs that aren't any good, and who does this rip off ? ME !
Now, I tend to download albums and if they're any good - I still buy them ! If they're shat, then I don't. Seems fair enough !!!
So b*ll*cks to this copyright crap, for me it's an effective way of reviewing the albums.
Matt
Now, I tend to download albums and if they're any good - I still buy them ! If they're shat, then I don't. Seems fair enough !!!
So b*ll*cks to this copyright crap, for me it's an effective way of reviewing the albums.
Matt
#14
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Bedfordshire
Posts: 4,037
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
But its like alot of laws its just not enforceable is it!
I mean buggery is illegal between husband and wife but has anyone ever been convicted of it???????
Gary
I mean buggery is illegal between husband and wife but has anyone ever been convicted of it???????
Gary
#15
Scooby Regular
Your MP3 player will be fine because of the iTunes music store and Napster 2.
You'll soon be able to be pulled over for "playing music of a slightly lesser quality than CD" or "Changing album faster than you can with a CD"
You'll soon be able to be pulled over for "playing music of a slightly lesser quality than CD" or "Changing album faster than you can with a CD"
#17
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Carnetix, Adams and Nitosport
Posts: 12,602
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I mean buggery is illegal between husband and wife but has anyone ever been convicted of it???????
Remember Natalie Imbruglia's second albulm that came out with copy protection... they all got taken back becuase they wouldn't play in computers and some multichangers!
They released the albulm without the protection and it went into the charts!
#18
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: The Great White North
Posts: 25,080
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Any copy protection method will be hacked, hackers love stuff like this, gives them a challenge!
Why do people rip off music? because it costs too much, simple. Apple's iTunes Music Store is the way things should be going, 99 cents per track, you mix and match, or buy the whole album.
I'm not some massive pirate but I will admit to having around 40 odd tracks I have downloaded, mainly as I don't want the whole album, or it's a track I've not been able to find anywhere.
Why do people rip off music? because it costs too much, simple. Apple's iTunes Music Store is the way things should be going, 99 cents per track, you mix and match, or buy the whole album.
I'm not some massive pirate but I will admit to having around 40 odd tracks I have downloaded, mainly as I don't want the whole album, or it's a track I've not been able to find anywhere.
#19
i agree ive rarely heard a good album all the way through, its only the ones that are release as singles because they are good, generally 5 are good and the other five are mediocre. Id pay £5 as thats what theyre worth, everyone is still profitting but the £10 markup the shops profit on they can go shove it i would however be more inclined to buy cds if the artists themselves actually took the largest cut...
#20
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
I cant understand how if we can copy a CD with music we like for less than a quid then why should we pay £15 for a CD knowing full well that £14 of it is profit, **** them as said above,
You could quite happily say, why should I pay £700 for adobe photoshop, when the cd it comes on is only a quid. Or why should I pay 30k for a subaru, when the parts only cost x amount to make.
#21
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Swilling coffee at my lab bench
Posts: 9,096
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
InvisibleMan: that's exactly why the record companies are so paranoid. It used to be the case that the only way for music to be distributed to everyone was to have a factory making CDs, a network of shops to sell them, and lots of advertising to let people know what was out there. All these retail and marketing overheads are expensive, which is one reason why CDs are so expensive. And, of course, the artists themselves can't get their music heard above the din without the help of a big label, so they end up over a barrel.
With the rise of the Internet, that's all changed. People can distribute music themselves. Record companies are becoming obsolete, and they're terrified. Pressurising governments to protect their outdated business model is all they can do to avoid the market deciding that they're no longer needed. It's going to be a bloody battle, that's for sure, but no business lasts forever. Ask any blacksmith, or chimney sweep, or farrier...
With the rise of the Internet, that's all changed. People can distribute music themselves. Record companies are becoming obsolete, and they're terrified. Pressurising governments to protect their outdated business model is all they can do to avoid the market deciding that they're no longer needed. It's going to be a bloody battle, that's for sure, but no business lasts forever. Ask any blacksmith, or chimney sweep, or farrier...
#22
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: A powerslide near you
Posts: 10,261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Any many (mainly smaller) artists will be able to sell their music direct to you without having to worry about getting 'record contract's. More music exposure can only be a good thing.
IMO, if record companies wanna survive, then they have to embrace the technology and start selling mp3's online etc.
IMO, if record companies wanna survive, then they have to embrace the technology and start selling mp3's online etc.
#23
So, record companies are deliberately putting errors on CDs to prevent them being played on PCs.
At the same time, microsoft are pushing the PC as the 'home entertainment centre'.
Something of a conflict!
Personally, I would return any CD that will not play in my PC as faulty, i.e. unfit for purpose. Perhaps we could bring a class action.
At the same time, microsoft are pushing the PC as the 'home entertainment centre'.
Something of a conflict!
Personally, I would return any CD that will not play in my PC as faulty, i.e. unfit for purpose. Perhaps we could bring a class action.
#25
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Swilling coffee at my lab bench
Posts: 9,096
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Exactly. Copy-protected CDs will still flood the net as MP3s, and even if the audio quality is slightly degraded by having been through an analogue stage, 99% of people won't care.
The choice then is between downloading music illegally and burning it to CD, or paying the usual high prices for a crippled and less useful product. Hmm....
The choice then is between downloading music illegally and burning it to CD, or paying the usual high prices for a crippled and less useful product. Hmm....
#26
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
If it wasn't for downloading MP3's off the net I wouldn't have heard of some bands/singers, or even had a chance to sample their music.
In fact I have a number of tracks from some artists that you can't even get in this country!!! (Live and Pauline Taylor are some that spring to mind). I actually tried to buy the Pauline Taylor albumn and couldn't get it without importing it from the US.
In fact I have a number of tracks from some artists that you can't even get in this country!!! (Live and Pauline Taylor are some that spring to mind). I actually tried to buy the Pauline Taylor albumn and couldn't get it without importing it from the US.
#28
hang on i'm having a flash back..............
"home tapings killing music" thats it thats the tag line they used in the 80,s
b l o x i used to buy an album on tape aprox once a fortnight, at £7.99 it wasnt bad value... occasionally i got a duff one but at that price it wasnt to bad...
then enter the cd "superior quality / lasts forever /plays when scratched to buggery.......cost £15.00 and instead of an average 90 mins as per tape.. you get 75..... or roughly 30 mins of some fab group with one hit single!!!!!!
I stopped buying cd,s and shopped around for deals at £9.99
who killed music..... the cynical fat cats at the record companys...
and they now ask for help from the goverment to bail out there failings....
the daft part is they have the answers themselves...
i remember the last monopolys invsetigation into cd pricing...the conclusion was they are over priced, but if punters will pay the asking price... the record companys arnt doing anything wrong!!
It makes me laugh they bitch about napster and kazaa.. but how else are you to get hold of deleted or old tracks....
ohhh thats right you write to mr sony/ emi and say i want this old deleted album repressed and reissued ,,,, just one copy please.
there reply .......... well you can guess....
hit em where it hurts
Mart
"home tapings killing music" thats it thats the tag line they used in the 80,s
b l o x i used to buy an album on tape aprox once a fortnight, at £7.99 it wasnt bad value... occasionally i got a duff one but at that price it wasnt to bad...
then enter the cd "superior quality / lasts forever /plays when scratched to buggery.......cost £15.00 and instead of an average 90 mins as per tape.. you get 75..... or roughly 30 mins of some fab group with one hit single!!!!!!
I stopped buying cd,s and shopped around for deals at £9.99
who killed music..... the cynical fat cats at the record companys...
and they now ask for help from the goverment to bail out there failings....
the daft part is they have the answers themselves...
i remember the last monopolys invsetigation into cd pricing...the conclusion was they are over priced, but if punters will pay the asking price... the record companys arnt doing anything wrong!!
It makes me laugh they bitch about napster and kazaa.. but how else are you to get hold of deleted or old tracks....
ohhh thats right you write to mr sony/ emi and say i want this old deleted album repressed and reissued ,,,, just one copy please.
there reply .......... well you can guess....
hit em where it hurts
Mart
#29
Far be it from me to defend music producers, but for accuracy, have any of you pirates seen the price of CD's recently? anything vaguely new is going out on Amazon for on average £8.99. Perhaps they are listening after all?