Justice UK style
24 July 2003, 08:31 AM
#1
BANNED
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Your home is worthless.You can't afford to run your car.Your job is on the line.Schadenfreude rules.
Posts: 4,787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2-2003340478,00.html
firstly apologies for not making this link clicky and for it being from the sun.
I'm all for equal rights whatever someones sexuality, but why on earth should these people get a pay out over nothing? Also why the hell should taxpayers be funding their case?
Does anyone support them, if so why??????
firstly apologies for not making this link clicky and for it being from the sun.
I'm all for equal rights whatever someones sexuality, but why on earth should these people get a pay out over nothing? Also why the hell should taxpayers be funding their case?
Does anyone support them, if so why??????
24 July 2003, 08:40 AM
#3
BANNED
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Your home is worthless.You can't afford to run your car.Your job is on the line.Schadenfreude rules.
Posts: 4,787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
lol@carpet cleaner- imagine the dismay if the donor for the op going the other way was a "little fella"
24 July 2003, 09:15 AM
#6
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: £1.785m reasons not to be here :)
Posts: 6,095
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
CC, once again your knowledge of such things is sadly lacking 
They use the skin to create internal walls so the *woman* can have *normal* sexual function.
D
They use the skin to create internal walls so the *woman* can have *normal* sexual function.
D
Trending Topics
24 July 2003, 11:47 AM
#10
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Disco, Disco!
Posts: 21,825
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From my vast medical knowledge ( i watch Casualty and ER regularly) i understand the operation is know as an Offer-a-slit-to-me. or the reverse is a attach-a-dick-to-me 
It is madness, PC to extremes again. Only one of the ladieees was a transexual (had the op) the others where transvestities (dress like a girl but have bloke bitz so not women in any way other than thier own minds) Besides that the law does not recognise Transexuals sex change, only what they where born as.
I understand that the publican (who by the way is gay and proud of it) only asked them to leave as he was concerend about trouble after complains from locals.
Why the hell should blokes dressed as women use the ladies loo???
What about the rights of women who do not want to use the loo with stange men in them???
No anything against men who want to be women or dress like them but this just takes the biscuit!
And to cap it all we the tax payer are footing the bill.
fecking madness!
edited as it appears my spelling is getting worse!
[Edited by Paul Habgood - 7/24/2003 1:20:13 PM]
It is madness, PC to extremes again. Only one of the ladieees was a transexual (had the op) the others where transvestities (dress like a girl but have bloke bitz so not women in any way other than thier own minds) Besides that the law does not recognise Transexuals sex change, only what they where born as.
I understand that the publican (who by the way is gay and proud of it) only asked them to leave as he was concerend about trouble after complains from locals.
Why the hell should blokes dressed as women use the ladies loo???
What about the rights of women who do not want to use the loo with stange men in them???
No anything against men who want to be women or dress like them but this just takes the biscuit!
And to cap it all we the tax payer are footing the bill.
fecking madness!
edited as it appears my spelling is getting worse!
[Edited by Paul Habgood - 7/24/2003 1:20:13 PM]
24 July 2003, 12:32 PM
#11
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: In the naughty corner
Posts: 10,869
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It is madness, PC to extremes again. Only one of the ladieees was a transexual (had the op) the others where transvestities (dress like a girl but have bloke bitz so not women in any way other than thier own minds)
Still, this is Scoobynet, where mis-information and intolerance run free, so I'm not even going to bother.
24 July 2003, 01:09 PM
#12
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Disco, Disco!
Posts: 21,825
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
TK
Quote
"Still, this is Scoobynet, where mis-information and intolerance run free, so I'm not even going to bother."
Looks to me like you already did - does it not
IMHO As for the difference then that is the phyisilogical difference as i understand it, and for misinformation, it's just my view and i am entitled to it.
and as stated
Quote
"From my vast medical knowledge ( i watch Casualty and ER regularly)"
[Edited by Paul Habgood - 7/24/2003 1:19:29 PM]
Quote
"Still, this is Scoobynet, where mis-information and intolerance run free, so I'm not even going to bother."
Looks to me like you already did - does it not
IMHO As for the difference then that is the phyisilogical difference as i understand it, and for misinformation, it's just my view and i am entitled to it.
and as stated
Quote
"From my vast medical knowledge ( i watch Casualty and ER regularly)"
[Edited by Paul Habgood - 7/24/2003 1:19:29 PM]
24 July 2003, 01:21 PM
#15
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 613
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What a small minded tosser (the landlord), whats being gay got to do with being a transexual? Its all about state of mind, not what kin way you are inclined to swing [img]images/smilies/mad.gif[/img]
I'm not too keen on tax being used for that, but I'd rather it go to them than some dolescum who has every type of benifit fraud known to mankind on the go just to get his next score.
I'm not too keen on tax being used for that, but I'd rather it go to them than some dolescum who has every type of benifit fraud known to mankind on the go just to get his next score.
24 July 2003, 01:24 PM
#16
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Disco, Disco!
Posts: 21,825
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Scooby loo
I mentioned the gay bit for one reason only, to make a point that he(the landlord) is more likely to be used to discrimination or predudice than say a hetro in the same situation. It taken any other way then it should not be!
I mentioned the gay bit for one reason only, to make a point that he(the landlord) is more likely to be used to discrimination or predudice than say a hetro in the same situation. It taken any other way then it should not be!
24 July 2003, 01:26 PM
#17
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: In the naughty corner
Posts: 10,869
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Looks to me like you already did - does it not
[Edited by TurboKitty - 7/24/2003 1:32:00 PM]
24 July 2003, 01:31 PM
#20
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: In the naughty corner
Posts: 10,869
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm not going to get involved, other than to point out that not everything you read on SN is correct, no matter who posts it. I know what the opinion of the majority of SN users is on this subject and I can't be arsed to argue about it.
24 July 2003, 01:40 PM
#24
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: In the naughty corner
Posts: 10,869
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Right, of course, I'm a smartarse for being better informed about something than someone else and for pointing out that not quite all the content on this thread is factually correct. Whatever.
We've had threads on this subject before, where the differences between TV and TS were discussed, and yet, same old ***** on this one, as usual. There's really no point.
One question Damian, what exactly is the problem with making people aware that Paul's statement isn't quite right? How is letting incorrect information go unchallenged a good thing? People disagree with other people on SN all the time, so what is it about this particular thread that leads you to tell me I should keep information to myself and let inaccurate statements persist?
[Edited by TurboKitty - 7/24/2003 1:43:49 PM]
We've had threads on this subject before, where the differences between TV and TS were discussed, and yet, same old ***** on this one, as usual. There's really no point.
One question Damian, what exactly is the problem with making people aware that Paul's statement isn't quite right? How is letting incorrect information go unchallenged a good thing? People disagree with other people on SN all the time, so what is it about this particular thread that leads you to tell me I should keep information to myself and let inaccurate statements persist?
[Edited by TurboKitty - 7/24/2003 1:43:49 PM]
24 July 2003, 01:43 PM
#26
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: London
Posts: 4,797
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Seems like a storm in a tea-cup to me. No-one ever asked me to drink up before chucking me out of a pub. It was more like "do you want to walk out that door or go through it, mate?".
TVs often use female toilets - after all there are separate cubicles (so i'm told
) in there so it's not like anyone can see anything in any case. However, most TVs know that some places this is acceptable, and a working mans boozer isn't likely to be one of them.
If you ask me people should make their own bed and then lie in it, not go running off to court at the slightest excuse.
TVs often use female toilets - after all there are separate cubicles (so i'm told
) in there so it's not like anyone can see anything in any case. However, most TVs know that some places this is acceptable, and a working mans boozer isn't likely to be one of them.If you ask me people should make their own bed and then lie in it, not go running off to court at the slightest excuse.
24 July 2003, 01:53 PM
#30
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: In the naughty corner
Posts: 10,869
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I doubt anyone has ever bothered to pass a law saying what the criteria for using a ladies loo are! If there are laws, I hope they made allowances for hermaphrodites! Maybe that's why they are so few about, maybe they explode messily due to not being able to relieve themselves.