NEW katana and popeye p1 forum
03 February 2003, 09:27 PM
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,152
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
either we do this or ban them
its getting very wearysome opening a perfectly interesting thread and having it hijacked by these two persuing a personal vendetta from one thread to another.
either settle this stupid dispute man to man or do it off this board via email or just ANYWHERE else other than on SN.
MATT the silent majority (I hope)
its getting very wearysome opening a perfectly interesting thread and having it hijacked by these two persuing a personal vendetta from one thread to another.
either settle this stupid dispute man to man or do it off this board via email or just ANYWHERE else other than on SN.
MATT the silent majority (I hope)
03 February 2003, 09:32 PM
#2
BANNED
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 661
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The same could be said for loads and loads of threads in the last few years in SN. I say re-educate Katana and assimilate popeye 
Anyway I hate amateur net police tactics like this, aint it up 2 the mods?
Anyway I hate amateur net police tactics like this, aint it up 2 the mods?
03 February 2003, 09:45 PM
#3
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,152
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
oh ffs im not trying to police anything im just sick to the back teeth of personal vendettas sprawling out from one thread to the next and it seems to be getting worse at the moment.
03 February 2003, 09:49 PM
#4
BANNED
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 661
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sooo, 'MATT the silent majority', instead of saying what you feel to the people concerned (in the thread, and at the time), trying do get them kicked off NSR for good is the right way to handle things?
Hmmm.
Hmmm.
03 February 2003, 10:10 PM
#7
BANNED
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 661
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I do agree I 'hate' a thread being hijacked. Happens all the time IMO and its never going to change. Personally I would rather find these sort of people 'in here' and try to change their views rather than trying to kid on they dont exist by banning everyone I dont agree with.
Trending Topics
03 February 2003, 10:17 PM
#8
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,152
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
No i take the word banning back i agree Jlanng it was spoken in haste (especially stupid as i hate censorship in any form)
And i dont mind this thread being locked immediatley either.
And i dont mind this thread being locked immediatley either.
03 February 2003, 11:03 PM
#10
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Now look whose arguing. And you talk about rising above it. Double standards methinks.
'either we do this or ban them' - who do you think you are?
'its getting very wearysome opening a perfectly interesting thread and having it hijacked by these two persuing a personal vendetta from one thread to another.' - about three threads. Not every thread. and the threads that are, happened to be pretty topical and bound to cause arguments. Are we all just meant to agree with each other like Parrotts? Is that what you want?
It appears only Jye has intervened on behalf of you and even hes arguing my case. LOL
Case dismissed. Next!
'either we do this or ban them' - who do you think you are?
'its getting very wearysome opening a perfectly interesting thread and having it hijacked by these two persuing a personal vendetta from one thread to another.' - about three threads. Not every thread. and the threads that are, happened to be pretty topical and bound to cause arguments. Are we all just meant to agree with each other like Parrotts? Is that what you want?
It appears only Jye has intervened on behalf of you and even hes arguing my case. LOL
Case dismissed. Next!
02 March 2003, 10:06 PM
#12
BANNED
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 661
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
--either we do this or ban them--
Emmm, seems a bit harsher than you now suggest..........
Perhaps a forum for the 'silent majority' would be better, going by the response you have ATM, LOL
And btw Matt, least I say what I feel at the time without crying like a ickle baby later
[Edited by Jye_0 - 2/3/2003 10:08:11 PM]
Emmm, seems a bit harsher than you now suggest..........
Perhaps a forum for the 'silent majority' would be better, going by the response you have ATM, LOL
And btw Matt, least I say what I feel at the time without crying like a ickle baby later
[Edited by Jye_0 - 2/3/2003 10:08:11 PM]
02 March 2003, 11:06 PM
#13
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Quote'No i take the word banning back i agree Jlanng it was spoken in haste (especially stupid as i hate censorship in any form)
And i dont mind this thread being locked immediatley either.'
Make you're mind up Mattstant. Thought you wanted to ban us????
Anyway I'm not grovelling to a pathetic person like yourself who posts a thread saying 'Ban us' then changes his view due to Jye. I agree things have lot a little heated these past few weeks. But that is due to heated debate. Will try harder to agree with the majority view from now on. Is that OK?
[Edited by Popeye P1 - 2/3/2003 11:15:10 PM]
And i dont mind this thread being locked immediatley either.'
Make you're mind up Mattstant. Thought you wanted to ban us????
Anyway I'm not grovelling to a pathetic person like yourself who posts a thread saying 'Ban us' then changes his view due to Jye. I agree things have lot a little heated these past few weeks. But that is due to heated debate. Will try harder to agree with the majority view from now on. Is that OK?
[Edited by Popeye P1 - 2/3/2003 11:15:10 PM]
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post