WebCam in Members Gallery!!
01 December 2002, 06:21 PM
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
A FIRST for Scoobynet - a WebCam image on Members Gallery - of yours truly, ever wondered what a 72 year old Scooby driving opinionated buffooon looks like??
You KNOW where to go!!
Pete
You KNOW where to go!!
Pete
01 December 2002, 10:06 PM
#3
BANNED
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
you really are a ******* arent you? pathetic little minded sad child - its beyond me why you would take someones identity and post utter garbage. you are making yourself look more stupid than the genuine pete ever did!!
James
James
02 December 2002, 01:21 AM
#7
Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 19,910
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
To the pslewis. username.........
I quote here what you put in the thread that, congratulations, you got deleted for nothing
I think a lot of your issues boil down to the firefighters strike am I right?
If so, then I can see why Pete being vocal about it is annoying you. Trouble is not many people are actually turning around and fighting back are they? Is this what bothers you? Why do you not fight back with factual information and ideas than lower yourself to this kind of behaviour?
TBH I do support the firefighters, but I do not agree with everything that is happening with regards to the strike.
Why don't you use your REAL name and fight back in factual terms instead of continuing this pathetic tirade of "copycat" abuse towards Pete?
You may not like what he says, but it is his opinion and I am sorry, but he is entitled to it!!!!! this is a public BBS. However, if we deem anything to be in any way libellious then it will be removed as listed in teh terms and conditions of you registering which provides good reading, I suggest you re-read it.
No he does not finance the BBS, nor does he in any way influence the goings on at Scoobynet. He is not associated with the BBS in any way apart from having a username registered. That is it.
FYI Pete and I used to not get on at all. We clashed many a time on views and opinions. Difference was that I found that fighting him in a different manner and accepting that he is entitled to think what he pleases stopped me from erupting every time he posted.
In this case, fighting fire with fire does not and will not work.
If people have an issue with the way Pete is posting or if you feel he is being abusive for no reason - for example abusive without some form of provocation!!!!! Then we have these magic links that report threads to moderators allowing an explanation of why.
All of the moderators have email addresses where you can email us and voice your concerns.
This manner of copying his username is IMHO pathetic and you are certainly not achieving what you hope to. IT is merely showing you up in a bad light.
Michelle.
I quote here what you put in the thread that, congratulations, you got deleted for nothing
.......meanwhile the REAL pslewis gets away with posting cr@p about the firefighters and generally abusing everyone else
If so, then I can see why Pete being vocal about it is annoying you. Trouble is not many people are actually turning around and fighting back are they? Is this what bothers you? Why do you not fight back with factual information and ideas than lower yourself to this kind of behaviour?
TBH I do support the firefighters, but I do not agree with everything that is happening with regards to the strike.
Why don't you use your REAL name and fight back in factual terms instead of continuing this pathetic tirade of "copycat" abuse towards Pete?
You may not like what he says, but it is his opinion and I am sorry, but he is entitled to it!!!!! this is a public BBS. However, if we deem anything to be in any way libellious then it will be removed as listed in teh terms and conditions of you registering which provides good reading, I suggest you re-read it.
No he does not finance the BBS, nor does he in any way influence the goings on at Scoobynet. He is not associated with the BBS in any way apart from having a username registered. That is it.
FYI Pete and I used to not get on at all. We clashed many a time on views and opinions. Difference was that I found that fighting him in a different manner and accepting that he is entitled to think what he pleases stopped me from erupting every time he posted.
In this case, fighting fire with fire does not and will not work.
If people have an issue with the way Pete is posting or if you feel he is being abusive for no reason - for example abusive without some form of provocation!!!!! Then we have these magic links that report threads to moderators allowing an explanation of why.
All of the moderators have email addresses where you can email us and voice your concerns.
This manner of copying his username is IMHO pathetic and you are certainly not achieving what you hope to. IT is merely showing you up in a bad light.
Michelle.
Trending Topics
02 December 2002, 10:34 AM
#10
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
It appears to have been removed 
Not sure why - didnt think it offensive really? Its just a side shot of me on my PC with no clothes on - not in bad taste really??
Just thought some may want a picture of me?
Ah well
Pete
Not sure why - didnt think it offensive really? Its just a side shot of me on my PC with no clothes on - not in bad taste really??
Just thought some may want a picture of me?
Ah well
Pete
02 December 2002, 03:44 PM
#13
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
'Chelle - any idea why??
Not questioning the wisdom of our beloved mods - but it puzzles me?
There was a nipple, granted, BUT I am MALE so it shouldnt count?
Should it?
Pete
Would it remain in muppets?
Not questioning the wisdom of our beloved mods - but it puzzles me?
There was a nipple, granted, BUT I am MALE so it shouldnt count?
Should it?
Pete Would it remain in muppets?
02 December 2002, 03:50 PM
#14
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 17,199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think the key to why it was deleted is in Chelle's comments to pslewisDOT above :
I quote here what you put in the thread that, congratulations, you got deleted for nothing
02 December 2002, 03:56 PM
#15
Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 19,910
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I should have written you got "it" deleted for nothing!!!!
Which is true, pslewis. (note the dot), with no provocation on that thread spouted unneccessary abuse at the REAL pslewis.
The thread had been saved before deletion.
Which is true, pslewis. (note the dot), with no provocation on that thread spouted unneccessary abuse at the REAL pslewis.
The thread had been saved before deletion.
02 December 2002, 04:04 PM
#16
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Oh, ok, I thought I had posted something I shouldnt have
Thats OK then!!
Happy now - Simon has e-mailed me his action (thanks to all mods for your support!)
Pete
Thats OK then!!
Happy now - Simon has e-mailed me his action (thanks to all mods for your support!)
Pete