I think it did go a bit too far here, and it seems self-destructive as well; considering the climate.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...er-in-germany/

 

Yes that's going a bit too far

 

Go a bit far, make some cash

And possibly pay the price, their choice

 

I mean, making fun of a so-believed higher entity whose ideology is not convincing to them can be understood as mocking a blonde pig complete with piercings and tattoos fly high like a mafia buzzard. I must add that even with that, you don't go around throwing your weight ignorantly like a dysfunct juvenile. You should put your disagreement forward like a normal human being. Anyway, mocking a tragically killed desperate human child like this is going a bit farther than a 'bit far' imo. Goes to show that sometimes, bigger pictures helps to develop a real picture or someone or something. Otherwise, we look as the solo incident of that shooting and give Charlie Hebdo the victimhood unconditionally. Perhaps if we research what these Charlie Hebdo have been really drawing and writing to wind the Islam followers up, we may see that they had been going a bit too far even before.

Back to this one, if anyone that caught the Sky news coverage of that rescue and didn't feel any empathy for the victims, I'd question them if they were really human.