So much anger from Labour this morning ..
08 May 2015, 07:20 AM
#1
So much anger from Labour this morning ..
Wow some seriously aggressive comments from Labour supporters this morning, I stand by my indifference to each party but it's worth considering what kind of person insults someone else for voting for their chosen party.
Very football like this, history has proven both parties to be useless, do you really think it makes any difference?
Maybe it sums up the type of people voting Labour
Very football like this, history has proven both parties to be useless, do you really think it makes any difference?
Maybe it sums up the type of people voting Labour
08 May 2015, 07:36 AM
#3
I've been doing some research and (although it's pretty obvious) it does appear the majority of Labour voters form the lower earning brackets.
"With the proportion living in social housing now so much lower than it was 20 years ago,this is a much less useful demographic group to analyse. Nevertheless, it is significant that of all the demographic sub groups analysed the only one where any party got more than 50% of the vote was Labour support amongst those in social housing. At the other end of the scale, only 29% of those who own their home outright said they were going to vote Labour. The outright owners were far more likely to be Conservative, with 44%. Fewer than one in five of those in social housing said there were going to vote Conservative, and they were equally unlikely to support the Lib Dem’s. "
"With the proportion living in social housing now so much lower than it was 20 years ago,this is a much less useful demographic group to analyse. Nevertheless, it is significant that of all the demographic sub groups analysed the only one where any party got more than 50% of the vote was Labour support amongst those in social housing. At the other end of the scale, only 29% of those who own their home outright said they were going to vote Labour. The outright owners were far more likely to be Conservative, with 44%. Fewer than one in five of those in social housing said there were going to vote Conservative, and they were equally unlikely to support the Lib Dem’s. "
08 May 2015, 07:41 AM
#5
I could say the same for anyone who Insults a supporter of any party.
But I can't help thinking the vocal and aggressive die hard supporters are part of the UKs problems; I honestly think these people have to be delusional in thinking that any of the major parties is the answer.
But I can't help thinking the vocal and aggressive die hard supporters are part of the UKs problems; I honestly think these people have to be delusional in thinking that any of the major parties is the answer.
08 May 2015, 08:04 AM
#6
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: .
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I could say the same for anyone who Insults a supporter of any party.
But I can't help thinking the vocal and aggressive die hard supporters are part of the UKs problems; I honestly think these people have to be delusional in thinking that any of the major parties is the answer.
But I can't help thinking the vocal and aggressive die hard supporters are part of the UKs problems; I honestly think these people have to be delusional in thinking that any of the major parties is the answer.
Why the hell so called intelligent people can't see this is beyond me.... unless they are not actually that intelligent of course!
08 May 2015, 08:06 AM
#7
If Party A get a nation into a pile of **** and Party B are seen as improving the situation then Party A supporters cannot really complain when Party B are voted back in.
Labour made their bed and now they are lying in it.
Labour made their bed and now they are lying in it.
Trending Topics
08 May 2015, 09:51 AM
#13
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: riding the crest of a wave ...
Posts: 46,493
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes
on
12 Posts
Along with some late commitment from Cameron on referendum, 5 year waiting for newcomers seeking benefits, etc
Or straight out of Europe....
Or straight out of Europe....
Last edited by dpb; 08 May 2015 at 09:54 AM.
08 May 2015, 11:53 AM
#15
Wow some seriously aggressive comments from Labour supporters this morning, I stand by my indifference to each party but it's worth considering what kind of person insults someone else for voting for their chosen party.
Very football like this, history has proven both parties to be useless, do you really think it makes any difference?
Maybe it sums up the type of people voting Labour
Very football like this, history has proven both parties to be useless, do you really think it makes any difference?
Maybe it sums up the type of people voting Labour
Its the empty vessel that makes the most noise...
08 May 2015, 05:58 PM
#16
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: The far North
Posts: 700
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Was it just anger from Labour though?
Was it not from every non Tory that woke up to the thought of another term under Cameron... and the idea that the trough will be full again for the snouts to go dipping in.
Was it not from every non Tory that woke up to the thought of another term under Cameron... and the idea that the trough will be full again for the snouts to go dipping in.
08 May 2015, 06:08 PM
#17
08 May 2015, 06:21 PM
#18
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 48,539
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Wow some seriously aggressive comments from Labour supporters this morning, I stand by my indifference to each party but it's worth considering what kind of person insults someone else for voting for their chosen party.
Very football like this, history has proven both parties to be useless, do you really think it makes any difference?
Maybe it sums up the type of people voting Labour
Very football like this, history has proven both parties to be useless, do you really think it makes any difference?
Maybe it sums up the type of people voting Labour
Pimmo's posts on this thread are thought provoking for sure.
09 May 2015, 06:28 AM
#20
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Cardiff. Wales
Posts: 11,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
09 May 2015, 07:17 AM
#21
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: My turbo blows, air lots of it!!
Posts: 9,073
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I've been doing some research and (although it's pretty obvious) it does appear the majority of Labour voters form the lower earning brackets.
"With the proportion living in social housing now so much lower than it was 20 years ago,this is a much less useful demographic group to analyse. Nevertheless, it is significant that of all the demographic sub groups analysed the only one where any party got more than 50% of the vote was Labour support amongst those in social housing. At the other end of the scale, only 29% of those who own their home outright said they were going to vote Labour. The outright owners were far more likely to be Conservative, with 44%. Fewer than one in five of those in social housing said there were going to vote Conservative, and they were equally unlikely to support the Lib Dem’s. "
"With the proportion living in social housing now so much lower than it was 20 years ago,this is a much less useful demographic group to analyse. Nevertheless, it is significant that of all the demographic sub groups analysed the only one where any party got more than 50% of the vote was Labour support amongst those in social housing. At the other end of the scale, only 29% of those who own their home outright said they were going to vote Labour. The outright owners were far more likely to be Conservative, with 44%. Fewer than one in five of those in social housing said there were going to vote Conservative, and they were equally unlikely to support the Lib Dem’s. "
09 May 2015, 09:46 AM
#22
Scooby Regular
The exact types who refuse to accept the Newage on WRX>STI
Joking aside the Left, Labour supporters, UAF, Respect Party and Hope Not Hate folks are becoming genuinely hostile by nature.
09 May 2015, 12:09 PM
#26
09 May 2015, 12:19 PM
#27
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 48,539
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Anger sentiment and its display isn't essentially a feature of the economically poor. He attempts to marry dysfunctional post-election reaction with a particular party, which is a biased attempt. He talks about his research (source unknown), which bears the long standing, already well-known facts for years, but he doesn't offer the source for his baseline observation.
09 May 2015, 12:29 PM
#28
Thought provoking, alright. Not sure about it being 'valid', though.
Anger sentiment and its display isn't essentially a feature of the economically poor. He attempts to marry dysfunctional post-election reaction with a particular party, which is a biased attempt. He talks about his research (source unknown), which bears the long standing, already well-known facts for years, but he doesn't offer the source for his baseline observation.
Anger sentiment and its display isn't essentially a feature of the economically poor. He attempts to marry dysfunctional post-election reaction with a particular party, which is a biased attempt. He talks about his research (source unknown), which bears the long standing, already well-known facts for years, but he doesn't offer the source for his baseline observation.
09 May 2015, 12:54 PM
#29
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: .
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Look, seriously now, you bleated on and on the other day about how you only engage me if I have a pop at you otherwise you will ignore me. Since then you have at least three times engaged me for no good reason and then ended up moaning.
Why not leave it alone or zip the whining and give as good as you get?
PS I am not and never would be on FB!! Make of that what you will!
09 May 2015, 01:20 PM
#30
FFS you need to chill out, I was just having a laugh hence the emoticon.
Look, seriously now, you bleated on and on the other day about how you only engage me if I have a pop at you otherwise you will ignore me. Since then you have at least three times engaged me for no good reason and then ended up moaning.
Why not leave it alone or zip the whining and give as good as you get?
PS I am not and never would be on FB!! Make of that what you will!
Look, seriously now, you bleated on and on the other day about how you only engage me if I have a pop at you otherwise you will ignore me. Since then you have at least three times engaged me for no good reason and then ended up moaning.
Why not leave it alone or zip the whining and give as good as you get?
PS I am not and never would be on FB!! Make of that what you will!
