Prince Andrew allegations
02 January 2015, 10:36 PM
#5
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Cotswolds
Posts: 806
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I don't agree with accusers being allowed to remain anonymous. I think either all names should be disclosed or none until case is tried. Seen first hand what this has done to a friend accused of rape by a Policeman's Daughter. Her name was only released when phone records proved she fabricated the whole thing and was subsequently sent down for 2.5years. His name was known shortly after arrest. Her name only came out after she was sucessfully tried for perverting the course of justice. Jane Doe 3 doesn't sell newspapers. In the meantime someone who could be perfectly innocent has their name dragged through the mud. It's a shame the significance is put on the former over the latter.
I think he is.
02 January 2015, 10:41 PM
#8
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Cotswolds
Posts: 806
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Coughs her parents coughs.
On a sidenote and being a little tongue-in-cheek.....William's hair. His face doesn't fit Male Pattern Baldness and, given he's potentially going to be the profile of the 1st Class Stamp/Bank Notes one day.....I genuinely wouldn't have any beef with the Royal Poster Boy shelling out some dosh on a Shane Warne style barnet replacement. Normally I don't get/do the whole cosmetic surgery thing but I do think he needs Hollywooding......just a smidge! He just looks more like Edward these days. Not cool. Ace Ventura quiff or something should sort him!
On a sidenote and being a little tongue-in-cheek.....William's hair. His face doesn't fit Male Pattern Baldness and, given he's potentially going to be the profile of the 1st Class Stamp/Bank Notes one day.....I genuinely wouldn't have any beef with the Royal Poster Boy shelling out some dosh on a Shane Warne style barnet replacement. Normally I don't get/do the whole cosmetic surgery thing but I do think he needs Hollywooding......just a smidge! He just looks more like Edward these days. Not cool. Ace Ventura quiff or something should sort him!
Last edited by daveyj; 02 January 2015 at 10:47 PM.
02 January 2015, 11:09 PM
#10
03 January 2015, 05:56 PM
#14
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Cotswolds
Posts: 806
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Trial by media. The day I see a British Royal convicted for anything in this day and age is the day I start believing Tottenham Hotspur will one day genuinely win the Premier League because if that could happen ANYTHING is possible. Yes I know I'm setting my sights low a bit with Spurs but I have to start somewhere.
http://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/uknews...aim/ar-BBht4Yo
I suppose saying "Push back" would be a little awkward, given the circumstances.
http://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/uknews...aim/ar-BBht4Yo
I suppose saying "Push back" would be a little awkward, given the circumstances.
Last edited by daveyj; 03 January 2015 at 06:04 PM.
04 January 2015, 10:48 PM
#16
Scooby Regular
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Here, There, Everywhere
Posts: 10,619
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
In America, you can accuse all you want with no come back. Didn't the same thing happen to David Beckham? Some bird accuse him of ******** her, but none of the dates matched to where she said he was, and where he actually was?
He tried to sue her, but American law states you can falsely accuse without them being able to sue if you were talking a load of ****!
04 January 2015, 11:01 PM
#18
Scooby Regular
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Pot Belly HQ
Posts: 16,694
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
He should refer her to the response given in Arkell Vs Pressdram.
05 January 2015, 10:36 AM
#19
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 48,539
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I don't agree with accusers being allowed to remain anonymous. I think either all names should be disclosed or none until case is tried. Seen first hand what this has done to a friend accused of rape by a Policeman's Daughter. Her name was only released when phone records proved she fabricated the whole thing and was subsequently sent down for 2.5years. His name was known shortly after arrest. Her name only came out after she was sucessfully tried for perverting the course of justice. Jane Doe 3 doesn't sell newspapers. In the meantime someone who could be perfectly innocent has their name dragged through the mud. It's a shame the significance is put on the former over the latter.
http://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/uknews...r2?ocid=TSHDHP
05 January 2015, 12:56 PM
#20
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Cardiff. Wales
Posts: 11,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This is a high profile case, and the name of the accuser has become public:
http://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/uknews...r2?ocid=TSHDHP
http://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/uknews...r2?ocid=TSHDHP
05 January 2015, 01:46 PM
#22
Scooby Regular
05 January 2015, 04:48 PM
#23
Media crap IMO. 'If' she came here and Andrew boned her, so what? She was 17 FFS.
The only way he'd be involved in 'a trial' is to give witness to her being acquainted with the bloke in Florida who was allegedly boning her, when she would be a minor at the time according to state law.
Who'd have thunk it, the media twisting things up.
The only way he'd be involved in 'a trial' is to give witness to her being acquainted with the bloke in Florida who was allegedly boning her, when she would be a minor at the time according to state law.
Who'd have thunk it, the media twisting things up.
05 January 2015, 05:35 PM
#24
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (23)
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: In the fast lane
Posts: 3,458
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What I want to know is this, what has this woman got that is so unique and special that some high roller lawyers and (supposedly) royalty can't keep their hands off her, and by their illicit association risk public vilification?
It's not as if Andrew would be begging for some easy lay to pay him attention is it? Whatever you think of him he's not a bad looking bloke and has quite a decent pedigree. So what makes anyone think he would nail this tramp, not once, but 'several' times?
It's not as if Andrew would be begging for some easy lay to pay him attention is it? Whatever you think of him he's not a bad looking bloke and has quite a decent pedigree. So what makes anyone think he would nail this tramp, not once, but 'several' times?
05 January 2015, 06:43 PM
#25
Scooby Regular
Probably a similar reason to Hugh Grant
Some people obviously enjoy the "no strings" aspect to sex and are prepared to pay for it
Plenty of rich attractive men pay for sex
Some people obviously enjoy the "no strings" aspect to sex and are prepared to pay for it
Plenty of rich attractive men pay for sex
05 January 2015, 07:04 PM
#26
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (23)
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: In the fast lane
Posts: 3,458
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I can understand why he might nail her once under certain circumstances, but more than once? As I say what makes this woman so special that she seems to be the 'one' for some apparently serious players.
No disrespect to the female gender, but she is just a woman.
No disrespect to the female gender, but she is just a woman.
05 January 2015, 07:11 PM
#27
Scooby Regular
Tiger Woods, banged loads over a long period - spending 1000's of thousand of dollars
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Sambob
Engine Management and ECU Remapping
41
27 November 2015 07:36 PM
soupy6667
Lighting and Other Electrical
0
21 September 2015 06:19 AM