When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Jesus! I've never seen you laugh this much ever before!
On the topic, Cameron has been quite calculative on this. He knows that realistically there are less hard core Christians and more genuine gay people in this country, so he won't lose that many votes instead he'll gain more.
Who are we to judge whether you like gold wheels or cocklinks?
Hang on, do you think that all they need is a remap? They could stand at the alter wearing det cans whilst the Vicar fiddles with their sensors .......
Jesus, I've never seen you laugh this much ever before!
Sweeti, no need to to refer to me as Jesus, Chip will do
On the topic, Cameron has been quite calculative on this. He knows that realistically there are less hard core Christians and more genuine gay people in this country, so he won't lose that many votes instead he'll gain more.
Clear cut politics there, David.
Yes your quite right there, it was done for the wrong reasons.
If gay people want to make a commitment through marriage then let them get on with it.
Only the terminally stupid would get upset about something that apparently doesn't affect them!
That's right, who gives a toss about it, I certainly don't. They bleat on about equality though don't they, but only see it from their own point of view. It's not for me though and doesn't affect me in any way so let them carry on.
I do however, still maintain as TH says, that it was done as a vote winner. Parliamentary time could be spent on much more important subjects rather than trivial, non important matters like this.
And your comment on terminally stupid. Can you really not accept sometimes that people are allowed differing views from yourself without you being abusing to them
That's right, who gives a toss about it, I certainly don't. They bleat on about equality though don't they, but only see it from their own point of view. It's not for me though and doesn't affect me in any way so let them carry on.
No, 'they' don't bleat on about it, a tiny minority wuth an axe to grind bleat on about it!
Originally Posted by Chip
I do however, still maintain as TH says, that it was done as a vote winner. Parliamentary time could be spent on much more important subjects rather than trivial, non important matters like this.
Yes, there's a surprise. NOT! A self serving politician doing something solely to feather their own nest... oh sorry, I forgot you are a fan of them and the wonderful system we have
Originally Posted by Chip
And your comment on terminally stupid. Can you really not accept sometimes that people are allowed differing views from yourself without you being abusing to them
Not when the differing views can only be held by those too stupid to see sense! If you don't like that then tough as frankly I coudln't give a **** whether you do or not!