MD321 T ON A STOCK 2.0L OPINIONS
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: bathgate ,scotland
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
MD321 T ON A STOCK 2.0L OPINIONS
As per title
looking for some feedback on how suitable a md321t would be on my bug sti on stock engine internals with supporting mods--
gt spec headers with harvey uppipe to aid spool
3"turbo back revolution system
800cc injectors
3 port boost cont solenoid
remap
are these turbos ideally suited to built/forged 2.5l engines or can they be made to produce good results on the 2.0l
hopefully people who have a 321 t fitted to theyre 2.0l stock engine can share theyre experiances - good and bad, possible problems etc
cheers
looking for some feedback on how suitable a md321t would be on my bug sti on stock engine internals with supporting mods--
gt spec headers with harvey uppipe to aid spool
3"turbo back revolution system
800cc injectors
3 port boost cont solenoid
remap
are these turbos ideally suited to built/forged 2.5l engines or can they be made to produce good results on the 2.0l
hopefully people who have a 321 t fitted to theyre 2.0l stock engine can share theyre experiances - good and bad, possible problems etc
cheers
#6
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Slowly rebuilding the kit of bits into a car...
Posts: 14,333
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I had a "H" on mine and it made around 390 bhp... but the car has always had a late spool up.
So with a 2.1 planned I swapped to an AET Turbos "T" equivalent, and she's making well over 400 bhp and spools around 3500 rpm. Then wallop !
HTH
dunx
So with a 2.1 planned I swapped to an AET Turbos "T" equivalent, and she's making well over 400 bhp and spools around 3500 rpm. Then wallop !
HTH
dunx
Trending Topics
#9
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: ECU Mapping - www.JollyGreenMonster.co.uk
Posts: 16,548
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Jura,
you seem to be giving out a lot of advice wihtout actually reading the op post properly.. he has AVCS heads as it is the STi.. this graph is Terry's time attack car I did years ago without AVCS heads so not a good comparison
Simon
you seem to be giving out a lot of advice wihtout actually reading the op post properly.. he has AVCS heads as it is the STi.. this graph is Terry's time attack car I did years ago without AVCS heads so not a good comparison
Simon
#10
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: ECU Mapping - www.JollyGreenMonster.co.uk
Posts: 16,548
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
the newage sti engines are tough little cookies.. many a bug/blob out there running a T or larger...
The T works very well on the newage sti engine
Simon
The T works very well on the newage sti engine
Simon
#12
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (78)
As per title
looking for some feedback on how suitable a md321t would be on my bug sti on stock engine internals with supporting mods--
gt spec headers with harvey uppipe to aid spool
3"turbo back revolution system
800cc injectors
3 port boost cont solenoid
remap
are these turbos ideally suited to built/forged 2.5l engines or can they be made to produce good results on the 2.0l
hopefully people who have a 321 t fitted to theyre 2.0l stock engine can share theyre experiances - good and bad, possible problems etc
cheers
looking for some feedback on how suitable a md321t would be on my bug sti on stock engine internals with supporting mods--
gt spec headers with harvey uppipe to aid spool
3"turbo back revolution system
800cc injectors
3 port boost cont solenoid
remap
are these turbos ideally suited to built/forged 2.5l engines or can they be made to produce good results on the 2.0l
hopefully people who have a 321 t fitted to theyre 2.0l stock engine can share theyre experiances - good and bad, possible problems etc
cheers
https://www.scoobynet.com/general-te...ighlight=md321
https://www.scoobynet.com/general-te...ighlight=md321
Rob
#13
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: southampton
Posts: 1,589
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i would be a litte worried running over 400bhp on bug eye on standard internals but then to be fair it does depend on how healty your engine is, if you not worried if it blows up and then build a 2.1, i have seen bug eye uk engines spit the dummy at standard power i think its a case of luck and also looking after your enigne if you do go to that power
#22
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (20)
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: n/a
Posts: 5,304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
md321v on the 2.5 clutch yes as its only done 4k miles lol probs wont last long .. might even slip at mapping but i'm on the look for a cheap twin plate otherwise just going to buy a new act clutch which are around 400
lets see what the 2.5 clutch can do as with the syvecs im going to be running multiple maps so can always redo my 'performance/meth' map again if clutch slips.
Eddy
p.s. the vf48 is going in for a map tweak next week rob.. only mod will be ecu change in prep for the md321v
lets see what the 2.5 clutch can do as with the syvecs im going to be running multiple maps so can always redo my 'performance/meth' map again if clutch slips.
Eddy
p.s. the vf48 is going in for a map tweak next week rob.. only mod will be ecu change in prep for the md321v
Last edited by eggy790; 04 March 2011 at 05:45 PM.
#25
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
About ACT clutch,i go at summer for ACT Clutch and 6speed,if its hold auto box 450bhp to summer will be perfect.
Good luck Eddy
Jura
#26
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (73)
You recommended the 6 puck unsprung disc which would be a right biatch for daily use & would wear out quicker due to absorbing heat, plus it shortens the spline life on the input shaft.
The street disc is ideal for daily use whilst taking a good old hiding
I am assuming 460 is hp?
Last edited by KAS35RSTI; 04 March 2011 at 07:05 PM.
#28
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (20)
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: n/a
Posts: 5,304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
yeah i recomended that act clutch kas for cost etc, the disk option is entirely yours, like i said frm the torque rating u quoted.i knew u had gone for the street disk option.
And yeah 456/415
And yeah 456/415
#30
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (17)
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: N.IRELAND
Posts: 750
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i have a md321t fitted to my 99 forged 2.0 engine running standard uk heads, before i fitted this turbo people kept talking about how laggy the turbo was and it was only suited to a 2.5l, looking back now they were talking absolute **** and had probably never driven a 2.0 with a t on it, before i had this turbo i had a td0620g it was on full boost by 4k hitting 1.7 bar the turbo pulled all the way to the red line and felt incredable to drive. now with the t i hit full boost 1.8 bar by 3.8k the turbo now feels like someone has slapped u in the face and pulls even harder to the red line.
in regards to the first post this turbo will be ok i dont know if u will be able to run as much boost but cing that u have avcs ur spool will be a wee bit better.
in regards to the first post this turbo will be ok i dont know if u will be able to run as much boost but cing that u have avcs ur spool will be a wee bit better.