2000 wrx part engine rebuild
#1
2000 wrx part engine rebuild
right peeps just looking through all the recipts for my car ej20 engine rebuild recept states
head skim
gasket set
hone block
set of rings
wash and clean blockcheck for
alighnment
timing belt kit
rcm pump
big ends
mains
crankshaft
dowels
turbo gasket
uppipe gasket
manifold gasket
oil and filter
antifreeze
injectors cleaned
this was sll done at 73k cars now done 88
so basicly bottom end of engine is new but i still have conrods piston and bores of an 88k engine not to mention the heads aswell
also why skim the heads if the car hasnt overheated how could the heads have warped
head skim
gasket set
hone block
set of rings
wash and clean blockcheck for
alighnment
timing belt kit
rcm pump
big ends
mains
crankshaft
dowels
turbo gasket
uppipe gasket
manifold gasket
oil and filter
antifreeze
injectors cleaned
this was sll done at 73k cars now done 88
so basicly bottom end of engine is new but i still have conrods piston and bores of an 88k engine not to mention the heads aswell
also why skim the heads if the car hasnt overheated how could the heads have warped
#2
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
Conrods and pistons don't 'wear' as such, presume that 'hone block' meant the cylinder bores prior to fitting new rings so no issues there.
I guess that the heads were skimmed as a precaution to get a good mating surface for the head gaskets.
As for the heads, they were probably checked over prior to being skimmed.
If the valves and seats seemed okay, the garage could have fitted new valve stem oil seals as a precaution but if the car isn't using or burning oil it's probably fine.
I guess that the heads were skimmed as a precaution to get a good mating surface for the head gaskets.
As for the heads, they were probably checked over prior to being skimmed.
If the valves and seats seemed okay, the garage could have fitted new valve stem oil seals as a precaution but if the car isn't using or burning oil it's probably fine.
#3
As per TheVoices. The obvious thing to do, btw, seeing as you have the receipt, would be to contact the place that did it and ask them if they remember the job, and, if so, whether they remember why they did what they did.
Incidentally, your car isn't a WRX. The WRX name was only used on imports in the classic era. UK cars are called Impreza Turbo 2000 AWDs. This isn't as pedantic a point as you might first think. Describing your car that way is an easy way to make folk who don't stop to ask assume you have a JDM car. On technical threads that can often cause confusion and inadvertent bad advice, so accuracy is always good.
Incidentally, your car isn't a WRX. The WRX name was only used on imports in the classic era. UK cars are called Impreza Turbo 2000 AWDs. This isn't as pedantic a point as you might first think. Describing your car that way is an easy way to make folk who don't stop to ask assume you have a JDM car. On technical threads that can often cause confusion and inadvertent bad advice, so accuracy is always good.
#4
As per TheVoices. The obvious thing to do, btw, seeing as you have the receipt, would be to contact the place that did it and ask them if they remember the job, and, if so, whether they remember why they did what they did.
Incidentally, your car isn't a WRX. The WRX name was only used on imports in the classic era. UK cars are called Impreza Turbo 2000 AWDs. This isn't as pedantic a point as you might first think. Describing your car that way is an easy way to make folk who don't stop to ask assume you have a JDM car. On technical threads that can often cause confusion and inadvertent bad advice, so accuracy is always good.
Incidentally, your car isn't a WRX. The WRX name was only used on imports in the classic era. UK cars are called Impreza Turbo 2000 AWDs. This isn't as pedantic a point as you might first think. Describing your car that way is an easy way to make folk who don't stop to ask assume you have a JDM car. On technical threads that can often cause confusion and inadvertent bad advice, so accuracy is always good.
#5
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (13)
Officially the badging is "Impreza Turbo 2000 4WD".
At a glance it looks like "A" for All (Wheel Drive), but if you look closely at the badging, I'm sure it's actually a "4" (despite Subaru markting their 4WD system as "AWD")
At a glance it looks like "A" for All (Wheel Drive), but if you look closely at the badging, I'm sure it's actually a "4" (despite Subaru markting their 4WD system as "AWD")
Last edited by joz8968; 22 August 2010 at 03:34 PM.
#7
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (13)
(..+ hairy palms. TMI )
I disagree.
The diagonal leg comes right down; then the horizontal leg comes across; and then there's a small gap between the horizontal and vertical legs. Look 'more' like a 4 to me....
Thing is it's so stylised, it could be read as either, anyway!
But if it was a 4, then it would go against Subaru's marketing - so it would indeed be inconsistent from that POV.
So I'm actually probably wrong lol
I disagree.
The diagonal leg comes right down; then the horizontal leg comes across; and then there's a small gap between the horizontal and vertical legs. Look 'more' like a 4 to me....
Thing is it's so stylised, it could be read as either, anyway!
But if it was a 4, then it would go against Subaru's marketing - so it would indeed be inconsistent from that POV.
So I'm actually probably wrong lol
Last edited by joz8968; 22 August 2010 at 04:00 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Scott@ScoobySpares
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
7
14 December 2015 08:16 AM
blockhead
Subaru Parts
19
07 November 2015 11:50 PM
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
20
22 October 2015 06:12 AM