Notices

400bhp Type on standard Internals by FCTuning

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09 January 2009, 12:33 PM
  #1  
Jam Performance
Former Sponsor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
Jam Performance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: London
Posts: 1,584
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 400bhp TypeR on standard Internals by FCTuning

Check this out, Sti5 Type R on standard internals running a GT30 mapped by Steve from FC Tuning..

Subaru Impreza Type R

Last edited by Jam Performance; 09 January 2009 at 12:43 PM.
Old 09 January 2009, 12:38 PM
  #2  
stu1984
Scooby Regular
 
stu1984's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Aberdeenshire
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

nice ,,,,

I should be ok , im looking to run about 350bhp on std internals when i get my car back on the road.
Old 09 January 2009, 12:41 PM
  #3  
Jam Performance
Former Sponsor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
Jam Performance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: London
Posts: 1,584
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default ..

Easily Just shows what the standard EJ20 engine is capable of
Old 09 January 2009, 12:50 PM
  #4  
dazdavies
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (22)
 
dazdavies's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: N/A
Posts: 7,061
Received 82 Likes on 46 Posts
Default

Until the crappy Classic OEM rods give out. The Forged pistons are fine at that level but the rods are sh*te and have been known to frequently fail at significantly lower power levels!!!!!

I wouldn't want to run over 300bhp on Classic OEM rods.

Last edited by dazdavies; 09 January 2009 at 12:52 PM.
Old 09 January 2009, 01:26 PM
  #5  
duncatr
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (18)
 
duncatr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 887
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Well my STI engine ran fine at 340BHP for long enough and its now handling just shy of 400BHP on a 20G with no problems so far.
Old 09 January 2009, 01:52 PM
  #6  
T5OLF
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
T5OLF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: The yorkshire dales - best roads in the UK
Posts: 3,311
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Mine has been running well over 300 brake on standard internals for 4 years now with no problems.
Old 09 January 2009, 02:56 PM
  #7  
Pavlo
Scooby Regular
 
Pavlo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: home
Posts: 6,316
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Nice result!

I wouldn't rely on the rods at that!

Last edited by Pavlo; 09 January 2009 at 04:43 PM.
Old 09 January 2009, 03:06 PM
  #8  
dazdavies
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (22)
 
dazdavies's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: N/A
Posts: 7,061
Received 82 Likes on 46 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by duncatr
Well my STI engine ran fine at 340BHP for long enough and its now handling just shy of 400BHP on a 20G with no problems so far.

Rather you than me, It's not a strategy I'd be taking considering the dozens of rod failures on Classics.

When a rod let's go it's messy, very messy. Inevitably that means its expensive too.
Old 09 January 2009, 03:08 PM
  #9  
joey_turbo
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (26)
 
joey_turbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Essex
Posts: 6,547
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

There is a 400+ in the latest Banzai or the one with dazdavies car in, thats a UK turbo on standard internals. So thats not even CDB.
Old 09 January 2009, 03:48 PM
  #10  
marc1941
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
marc1941's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Currently running 457bhp and 399lbft on uk turbo with standard rods with no problems at all
Old 09 January 2009, 03:52 PM
  #11  
eggy790
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (20)
 
eggy790's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: n/a
Posts: 5,304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

lol at above , mad guy
Old 09 January 2009, 03:57 PM
  #12  
Pete
Scooby Regular
 
Pete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Shropshire
Posts: 4,151
Received 7 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by marc1941
Currently running 457bhp and 399lbft on uk turbo with standard rods with no problems at all

Good on ya pal, admire your madness.........
Old 09 January 2009, 04:01 PM
  #13  
KareenaBaby
BANNED
 
KareenaBaby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: At work & on SN
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by K18LLR
Easily Just shows what the standard EJ20 engine is capable of

u have a nice lookin car babes x x
Old 09 January 2009, 04:07 PM
  #14  
Mus
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Mus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: will be back in another scooby in time....
Posts: 2,554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by T5OLF
Mine has been running well over 300 brake on standard internals for 4 years now with no problems.
rods do not fail due to POWER

they fail due to TORQUE

its the force of torque and reciprocating mass that will force A bolt to stretch

its when the bolt stretches and fails to clamp down on the cracnkshaft
Old 09 January 2009, 04:09 PM
  #15  
dazdavies
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (22)
 
dazdavies's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: N/A
Posts: 7,061
Received 82 Likes on 46 Posts
Default

The open deck block isn't the weak part of the equation nor are the pistons.

Its the CLASSIC oem Rods.

If you're running a true 457 bhp on an original engine from a classic shaped UK car then you're on borrowed time and you won't be far away from a massive engine failure.
Because in an engine from a UK classic both the rods and pistons are crap.


If it was a newage then fair enough as the rod design is totally different.

All these people quoting reasonable power from UK Classic are they on untouched original UK Classic Bottom ends???

Last edited by dazdavies; 09 January 2009 at 04:14 PM.
Old 09 January 2009, 04:29 PM
  #16  
Pete
Scooby Regular
 
Pete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Shropshire
Posts: 4,151
Received 7 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Daz,

Excuse my ignorance, SO an Import classic is stronger internally then, that,s what you,re saying?? so what,s the max i could run my V3 internals too??
Old 09 January 2009, 04:54 PM
  #17  
T5OLF
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
T5OLF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: The yorkshire dales - best roads in the UK
Posts: 3,311
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mus 1st class sti type r
rods do not fail due to POWER

they fail due to TORQUE

its the force of torque and reciprocating mass that will force A bolt to stretch

its when the bolt stretches and fails to clamp down on the cracnkshaft
I ran ARP rod bolts in my astra 16v engine. Shame these engines are not as easy to work on or I would do the same.

Are the import rods able to stand more than the Uk ones - anyone?
Old 09 January 2009, 04:55 PM
  #18  
jd5217
Scooby Regular
 
jd5217's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: over the hills and far away
Posts: 2,156
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Daz suggest you pick up the Winter 2008 copy of Total Impreza.
Old 09 January 2009, 05:22 PM
  #19  
Pavlo
Scooby Regular
 
Pavlo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: home
Posts: 6,316
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Rods from the newage car seem much more durable than those on the classic shape engines.
Old 09 January 2009, 05:37 PM
  #20  
jd5217
Scooby Regular
 
jd5217's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: over the hills and far away
Posts: 2,156
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

fingers crossed the newage are better, no issues on mine to date.
The following users liked this post:
Old 09 January 2009, 05:44 PM
  #21  
Mus
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Mus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: will be back in another scooby in time....
Posts: 2,554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by marc1941
Currently running 457bhp and 399lbft on uk turbo with standard rods with no problems at all
what turbo are using and how long has been like that?

fc tuning sent me a link the other day of him tuning a bike he seems to tune anything with engine and ecu.lol

thats some impresive figures up there then gain he had two mag featured cars within the last 2months.
Old 09 January 2009, 06:15 PM
  #22  
Neil..
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (35)
 
Neil..'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,784
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by marc1941
Currently running 457bhp and 399lbft on uk turbo with standard rods with no problems at all
Marc, yours is a UK turbo, with an STi8 bottom end in, so far superior to std classic set up.
Old 09 January 2009, 06:24 PM
  #23  
Jam Performance
Former Sponsor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
Jam Performance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: London
Posts: 1,584
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default ..

Originally Posted by E_M_B
Marc, yours is a UK turbo, with an STi8 bottom end in, so far superior to std classic set up.
Makes sense now, I was thinking how those power/torque levels were possible on standard uk turbo bottom end
Old 09 January 2009, 06:30 PM
  #24  
dazdavies
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (22)
 
dazdavies's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: N/A
Posts: 7,061
Received 82 Likes on 46 Posts
Default

Right lets try and starighten some of this out I don't need to read magaine articles.

I'm saying that original bottom ends from a classic UK scooby are weak. This weakness is caused by crappy OEM rods and crappy cast pistons!!

We are talking about original untouched bottom ends, not ones that have been replaced with short motors from later models i.e Newage STI 8 bottom ends which have a completely different rod design and slightly better pistons.

Pete

Even import Classic STI's use the same crappy rods so the same problem exists. import WRX bottom ends are usually the same as the crappy UK bottom ends. SOME classic STI's came with forged pistons which makes them stronger than the uk engine but the rods are the same.

In short Pete yours is an STI so it will still have the weak rods but should have forged pistons. Your rods are still the limiting factor. I wouldn't want more than an absolute maximium of 350bhp going through standard rods and I wouldn't have 100% faith in that holding together.


I thought 457bhp and 399ftlb was too good to be true for a standard classic bottom end.

Remember folks we are talking about a standard UK engine or a WRX engine from a classic. Not STI's and certainly not bottom end transplants from Newage STI's.
Old 09 January 2009, 06:33 PM
  #25  
stevie1982
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (16)
 
stevie1982's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 6,023
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

if the bottom end in a classic can take 400bhp with similar torque, is it not worth just uprating the rods? Say to new age or arp rods or similar Can this be done with the lump left in or is it still an engine out and strip down?
Old 09 January 2009, 06:39 PM
  #26  
MartynJ
Scooby Regular
 
MartynJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Enginetuner Plymouth for 4wd RR Mapping Apexi Ecutek Alcatek Proper Garage More than just a laptop!
Posts: 2,629
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by stevie1982
Can this be done with the lump left in or is it still an engine out and strip down?

Not unless you know a good gynaecologist, lmao.
Old 09 January 2009, 06:46 PM
  #27  
dazdavies
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (22)
 
dazdavies's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: N/A
Posts: 7,061
Received 82 Likes on 46 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by stevie1982
if the bottom end in a classic can take 400bhp with similar torque, is it not worth just uprating the rods? Say to new age or arp rods or similar Can this be done with the lump left in or is it still an engine out and strip down?
I'm dizzy I keep going round in circles.

A bottom end from a classic is not good for 400bhp. The only parts of it that are capable are the crank and the block and the STI forged pistons if you have them.

Repeat after me

In short for a reliable 400bhp from a classic bottom end you would ideally replace the rods, pistons and bearings.

I'm not going to say it again lol

ps ARP don't make rods

Last edited by dazdavies; 09 January 2009 at 06:47 PM.
Old 09 January 2009, 06:54 PM
  #28  
john banks
Scooby Regular
 
john banks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: 32 cylinders and many cats
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by MartynJ
Not unless you know a good gynaecologist, lmao.
That's the reason I can't do it, I only have a diploma from the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, if I was good I'd have a membership, then I could buy a Subaru and change the rods and pistons with the engine in place like you can on an Evo, but without the crappy Evo gearbox

BTW, I had 406 BHP on a stock internals MY00 UK turbo years ago but I didn't trust it to stay in one piece so had a series of rattly forged 2.3s and then moved to 2.5s.

Last edited by john banks; 09 January 2009 at 06:56 PM.
Old 09 January 2009, 07:22 PM
  #29  
dazdavies
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (22)
 
dazdavies's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: N/A
Posts: 7,061
Received 82 Likes on 46 Posts
Default

2.5's FTW especially the sleeved closed deck variety with forged internals!!
Old 09 January 2009, 07:29 PM
  #30  
stevebt
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (8)
 
stevebt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 16,732
Received 33 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

Daz, so if I want a reliable 400bhp on a UK block I pnly need new bearings and thats it????


Quick Reply: 400bhp Type on standard Internals by FCTuning



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:23 AM.