400bhp Type on standard Internals by FCTuning
#1
Former Sponsor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: London
Posts: 1,584
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
400bhp TypeR on standard Internals by FCTuning
Check this out, Sti5 Type R on standard internals running a GT30 mapped by Steve from FC Tuning..
Subaru Impreza Type R
Subaru Impreza Type R
Last edited by Jam Performance; 09 January 2009 at 12:43 PM.
#4
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (22)
Until the crappy Classic OEM rods give out. The Forged pistons are fine at that level but the rods are sh*te and have been known to frequently fail at significantly lower power levels!!!!!
I wouldn't want to run over 300bhp on Classic OEM rods.
I wouldn't want to run over 300bhp on Classic OEM rods.
Last edited by dazdavies; 09 January 2009 at 12:52 PM.
Trending Topics
#12
Scooby Regular
#14
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: will be back in another scooby in time....
Posts: 2,554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
they fail due to TORQUE
its the force of torque and reciprocating mass that will force A bolt to stretch
its when the bolt stretches and fails to clamp down on the cracnkshaft
#15
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (22)
The open deck block isn't the weak part of the equation nor are the pistons.
Its the CLASSIC oem Rods.
If you're running a true 457 bhp on an original engine from a classic shaped UK car then you're on borrowed time and you won't be far away from a massive engine failure.
Because in an engine from a UK classic both the rods and pistons are crap.
If it was a newage then fair enough as the rod design is totally different.
All these people quoting reasonable power from UK Classic are they on untouched original UK Classic Bottom ends???
Its the CLASSIC oem Rods.
If you're running a true 457 bhp on an original engine from a classic shaped UK car then you're on borrowed time and you won't be far away from a massive engine failure.
Because in an engine from a UK classic both the rods and pistons are crap.
If it was a newage then fair enough as the rod design is totally different.
All these people quoting reasonable power from UK Classic are they on untouched original UK Classic Bottom ends???
Last edited by dazdavies; 09 January 2009 at 04:14 PM.
#16
Scooby Regular
Daz,
Excuse my ignorance, SO an Import classic is stronger internally then, that,s what you,re saying?? so what,s the max i could run my V3 internals too??
Excuse my ignorance, SO an Import classic is stronger internally then, that,s what you,re saying?? so what,s the max i could run my V3 internals too??
#17
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: The yorkshire dales - best roads in the UK
Posts: 3,311
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Are the import rods able to stand more than the Uk ones - anyone?
The following users liked this post:
#21
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: will be back in another scooby in time....
Posts: 2,554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
fc tuning sent me a link the other day of him tuning a bike he seems to tune anything with engine and ecu.lol
thats some impresive figures up there then gain he had two mag featured cars within the last 2months.
#22
#24
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (22)
Right lets try and starighten some of this out I don't need to read magaine articles.
I'm saying that original bottom ends from a classic UK scooby are weak. This weakness is caused by crappy OEM rods and crappy cast pistons!!
We are talking about original untouched bottom ends, not ones that have been replaced with short motors from later models i.e Newage STI 8 bottom ends which have a completely different rod design and slightly better pistons.
Pete
Even import Classic STI's use the same crappy rods so the same problem exists. import WRX bottom ends are usually the same as the crappy UK bottom ends. SOME classic STI's came with forged pistons which makes them stronger than the uk engine but the rods are the same.
In short Pete yours is an STI so it will still have the weak rods but should have forged pistons. Your rods are still the limiting factor. I wouldn't want more than an absolute maximium of 350bhp going through standard rods and I wouldn't have 100% faith in that holding together.
I thought 457bhp and 399ftlb was too good to be true for a standard classic bottom end.
Remember folks we are talking about a standard UK engine or a WRX engine from a classic. Not STI's and certainly not bottom end transplants from Newage STI's.
I'm saying that original bottom ends from a classic UK scooby are weak. This weakness is caused by crappy OEM rods and crappy cast pistons!!
We are talking about original untouched bottom ends, not ones that have been replaced with short motors from later models i.e Newage STI 8 bottom ends which have a completely different rod design and slightly better pistons.
Pete
Even import Classic STI's use the same crappy rods so the same problem exists. import WRX bottom ends are usually the same as the crappy UK bottom ends. SOME classic STI's came with forged pistons which makes them stronger than the uk engine but the rods are the same.
In short Pete yours is an STI so it will still have the weak rods but should have forged pistons. Your rods are still the limiting factor. I wouldn't want more than an absolute maximium of 350bhp going through standard rods and I wouldn't have 100% faith in that holding together.
I thought 457bhp and 399ftlb was too good to be true for a standard classic bottom end.
Remember folks we are talking about a standard UK engine or a WRX engine from a classic. Not STI's and certainly not bottom end transplants from Newage STI's.
#25
if the bottom end in a classic can take 400bhp with similar torque, is it not worth just uprating the rods? Say to new age or arp rods or similar Can this be done with the lump left in or is it still an engine out and strip down?
#26
Scooby Regular
#27
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (22)
A bottom end from a classic is not good for 400bhp. The only parts of it that are capable are the crank and the block and the STI forged pistons if you have them.
Repeat after me
In short for a reliable 400bhp from a classic bottom end you would ideally replace the rods, pistons and bearings.
I'm not going to say it again lol
ps ARP don't make rods
Last edited by dazdavies; 09 January 2009 at 06:47 PM.
#28
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: 32 cylinders and many cats
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
That's the reason I can't do it, I only have a diploma from the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, if I was good I'd have a membership, then I could buy a Subaru and change the rods and pistons with the engine in place like you can on an Evo, but without the crappy Evo gearbox
BTW, I had 406 BHP on a stock internals MY00 UK turbo years ago but I didn't trust it to stay in one piece so had a series of rattly forged 2.3s and then moved to 2.5s.
BTW, I had 406 BHP on a stock internals MY00 UK turbo years ago but I didn't trust it to stay in one piece so had a series of rattly forged 2.3s and then moved to 2.5s.
Last edited by john banks; 09 January 2009 at 06:56 PM.