Rotated inlet manifold on a newage? Anyone?

Subscribe
Aug 22, 2008 | 07:51 PM
  #1  
Anyone done this and more importantly, anyone done it and managed to retain the aircon?

Interested to see you pics and any issues you found along the way?

Im looking into how much work it is to do. Ive asked the guys in the US the same question but its always nice to see if anyone has done it in the UK or if i would be the first.

(Which i highly doubt)
Reply 0
Aug 22, 2008 | 08:17 PM
  #2  
look out for "oldfella" ........he has / had a rotated setup on his bugeye IIRC the aircon went though !!

Shaun
Reply 0
Aug 22, 2008 | 08:32 PM
  #3  
Im quite partial to my aircon in the summer, so it would be nice to keep it
Reply 0
Aug 22, 2008 | 09:22 PM
  #4  
have always wondered what advantage is there from rotating the inlet?
Reply 0
Aug 22, 2008 | 09:25 PM
  #5  
Frayz, assuming you are going ahead with this, will you do a project thread on it, would be very keen to watch that.
Reply 0
Aug 22, 2008 | 09:26 PM
  #6  
Quote: have always wondered what advantage is there from rotating the inlet?

Shorter FMIC piping = less lag
Reply 0
Aug 22, 2008 | 09:36 PM
  #7  
i'm new to the whole turbo setup etc, but if i take away my tmic and fit a fmic will that cause more lag coz the front mount will be longer piping?
Reply 0
Aug 22, 2008 | 09:36 PM
  #8  
why bother ??? I have never tried it as I don't want to loose my aircon. The gains are very minimal !!! I'm sure people do it as an extreme measure then think why did I bother ???

It means replacing all your APS pipework. Why not just add a bigger rotated turbo ???
Reply 0
Aug 22, 2008 | 09:37 PM
  #9  
Quote: Shorter FMIC piping = less lag
Lag is totally different when your talking rotated systems
Reply 0
Aug 22, 2008 | 09:39 PM
  #10  
Quote: Lag is totally different when your talking rotated systems

Ahh, whys that?
Reply 0
Aug 22, 2008 | 09:49 PM
  #11  
Quote: Ahh, whys that?
On a bigger turbo your are going to have lag but once it comes in If you go for a really big garret I doubt you would see full boost till say nearly 5000rpm but once it did come on boost it would probably make mine seem like walking

I would think a gt35r would say make full boost on frayz's car by about 3800rpm and be running out of puff by 7000rpm
Reply 0
Aug 22, 2008 | 10:17 PM
  #12  
Here's a pic of the RCMS Gobstopper



Air is pretty elastic and there's still a lot of it about

I have methanol / aquamist injection.......there are lots more interesting ways to break things before going for a rotated setup LOL

Shaun
Reply 0
Aug 22, 2008 | 10:35 PM
  #13  
Quote: Ahh, whys that?

On a 2ltr

I have driven a car with a td05 turbo mapped to 1.6bar peaking at 1.8/9bar, a 20g turbo mapped to 1.5bar peaking at 1.6bar. I have had a twin scroll turbo car with hyrbrid twin scroll turbo running 1.8bar peaking at 1.9bar and all these so called fast cars are very very slow as compared to a gt30r running 1.7bar As lag all depends on your gear You get in a proper power car and you don't care about lag as it's very easy to drop a gear and stay on boost

I'm sure steven darley can comment on how slow my hybrid twin scroll turbo was as compared to a proper rotated system
Reply 0
Aug 23, 2008 | 10:01 AM
  #14  
Lag is goverened by the turbo making boost... its the boost response that should be better with a rotated manifold setup.

Im sure the difference is quite small but id does make foir a much cleaner engine bay with shorter pipe runs.

Why would i want bigger than a GT30 if i want as minimal lag as possible Steve? lol
Reply 0
Aug 23, 2008 | 10:31 AM
  #15  
Must admit the engine bay does look a lot neater though

Shaun
Reply 0
Aug 23, 2008 | 10:38 AM
  #16  
Frayz, from previous posts of yours, it sounds like you will be going blow through on the stock ECU (which will reduce the "lag effect" from the rich spike on tip in anyway). Do you think you will even be able to notice the effect of the shorter pipe run? Interested to know how much of a difference it really makes at the end of the day.
Reply 0
Aug 23, 2008 | 10:56 AM
  #17  
Here is a photo of my set up. Not finished yet but hopefully will be soon

Jac




Reply 0
Aug 23, 2008 | 01:12 PM
  #18  
frayz
have a talk to richard at tracktive solutions their cars always run with the modzs your after and last herd they were in talks with a supplier as they after a higher quality finish which iam sure youd be after lol
Reply 0
Aug 23, 2008 | 01:55 PM
  #19  
A few here for you

Going for 450 BHP
Reply 0
Aug 23, 2008 | 04:04 PM
  #20  
..
Quote: On a 2ltr

I have driven a car with a td05 turbo mapped to 1.6bar peaking at 1.8/9bar, a 20g turbo mapped to 1.5bar peaking at 1.6bar. I have had a twin scroll turbo car with hyrbrid twin scroll turbo running 1.8bar peaking at 1.9bar and all these so called fast cars are very very slow as compared to a gt30r running 1.7bar As lag all depends on your gear You get in a proper power car and you don't care about lag as it's very easy to drop a gear and stay on boost

I'm sure steven darley can comment on how slow my hybrid twin scroll turbo was as compared to a proper rotated system
As they say Lag is just foreplay - if your in the right gear before you accelerate its not noticed
Reply 0
Aug 23, 2008 | 09:11 PM
  #21  
Quote: Frayz, assuming you are going ahead with this, will you do a project thread on it, would be very keen to watch that.

Yer *** on Frayz, we want a project thread on your engine build.

PROJECT PROJECT PROJECT PROJECT PROJECT PROJECT PROJECT PROJECT PROJECT PROJECT PROJECT PROJECT PROJECT PROJECT PROJECT PROJECT PROJECT PROJECT PROJECT PROJECT PROJECT PROJECT PROJECT PROJECT PROJECT PROJECT PROJECT PROJECT PROJECT PROJECT PROJECT PROJECT PROJECT PROJECT PROJECT PROJECT PROJECT PROJECT PROJECT PROJECT PROJECT PROJECT PROJECT PROJECT PROJECT PROJECT PROJECT PROJECT PROJECT PROJECT PROJECT PROJECT PROJECT PROJECT PROJECT PROJECT PROJECT PROJECT PROJECT PROJECT PROJECT PROJECT PROJECT PROJECT PROJECT PROJECT PROJECT PROJECT PROJECT PROJECT PROJECT PROJECT PROJECT PROJECT PROJECT PROJECT PROJECT PROJECT PROJECT PROJECT PROJECT PROJECT
Reply 0
Aug 23, 2008 | 09:18 PM
  #22  
Quote: As they say Lag is just foreplay - if your in the right gear before you accelerate its not noticed

Last year my GT35 rotated subi went from 60-80 in 1.038 seconds and 50-90 in 2.287 seconds. pasengers never see to mention lag - not sure why
Reply 0
Aug 23, 2008 | 11:32 PM
  #23  
I Reversed my inlet last year. I'm now building a new car and am not going to bother. It was loads of hassle and not worth the minimal gains.

I also hated not having aircon.

Here's how mine looked last year.
Reply 0
Aug 24, 2008 | 01:23 AM
  #24  
I think it can be done and retain the aircon guys.. as for a project thread... i already have one.. its just in members gallery lol
Reply 0
Aug 24, 2008 | 01:26 AM
  #25  
Quote: Frayz, from previous posts of yours, it sounds like you will be going blow through on the stock ECU (which will reduce the "lag effect" from the rich spike on tip in anyway). Do you think you will even be able to notice the effect of the shorter pipe run? Interested to know how much of a difference it really makes at the end of the day.
I will be going blow-thru mate... i dont honestly know how much difference it will make but whist im doing the rest of it... i might aswell look at doing this too lol
Reply 0
Aug 25, 2008 | 12:49 PM
  #26  
I suppose any excuse to post this photo I took of the Prodrive P2



Not sure about the air con though.
Reply 0
Aug 25, 2008 | 06:45 PM
  #27  
Quote: have a talk to richard at tracktive solutions their cars always run with the modzs your after and last herd they were in talks with a supplier as they after a higher quality finish which iam sure youd be after lol
The Tracktive demo car is now back on the standard inlet and was running this at ScoobyLive this year.
Reply 0
Aug 25, 2008 | 06:55 PM
  #28  
I think having spoken to most people who have done it, its only really going to give the motor a clean look and nothing more performance wise.

Got to weigh up if its worth the agro doing it.
Reply 0
Aug 26, 2008 | 09:58 AM
  #29  
Here you go Frayz....







I was contemplating this route at one point, but my main concern as I was going blow through was being able to contain a straight section before the MAF element, hence why I did what I did...

The difference between draw through MAF and blow through is like chalk and cheese...
Reply 0
Aug 26, 2008 | 05:10 PM
  #30  
Yeah, ive had the same thoughts Neil. I think it can be done but after talking alot to the US guys that seem to do it alot. It seems the actual gain from doing it is so small compared to the huge amount of agro it takes making it all fit and work nice.
Reply 0