best turbo for 450bhp on 2.0 newage wrx
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 537
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
best turbo for 450bhp on 2.0 newage wrx
what is the best turbo ????? heard alot about the md turbos and alittle about the fp green.....
I want a good 450bhp with not over the top lag. ive got a vf34 turbo which is amazing but having my bottom end rebuilt with forged pistons con rods, uprated oil pump, arp head bolts. 650cc injectors and a aeromotive fpr, got HKS headers, all will be running on eck mapping
just really stuck on what turbo....... please help asap
I want a good 450bhp with not over the top lag. ive got a vf34 turbo which is amazing but having my bottom end rebuilt with forged pistons con rods, uprated oil pump, arp head bolts. 650cc injectors and a aeromotive fpr, got HKS headers, all will be running on eck mapping
just really stuck on what turbo....... please help asap
#2
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: The right side of 30psi
Posts: 539
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The MD321T will get you where you need to be and is a very good Turbo.
Just one thing you didn't mention above, uprated gearbox?
The WRX Box won't last long with over 400 lb/ft of torque
Just one thing you didn't mention above, uprated gearbox?
The WRX Box won't last long with over 400 lb/ft of torque
#4
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Edinburgh (ish)
Posts: 8,089
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#5
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 537
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
umm, some thing to think about. the reason of not going for a 2.5 bottom end was i didnt want to have to change the gearbox with all that torque.....
maybe i should look for more the 400bhp....
maybe i should look for more the 400bhp....
Last edited by l33 griff; 01 December 2007 at 06:35 PM.
#7
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: NORTH EAST
Posts: 1,405
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
bttt
why would you buy a sti 400bhp is the limit for the internal parts on a sti engine , so you still need forge pistons the rods im told will take 400bhp no problem .
Trending Topics
#9
hello l33 griff
im going down the same route as you but in 2.5 sti closed block. i had the choice of the m321t or the garrett gt30. the m321t sits in the standard postion where the oe turbo is, but the garrett sits in a differnet postion. the m321t turbo is around the £1400 mark and the gt30 is around the £1000 mark BUT you need a special down pipe and uppipe to suit the gt30. just remember if you are going down the 2.0 road u will suffer more turbo lag than the 2.5.
im going down the same route as you but in 2.5 sti closed block. i had the choice of the m321t or the garrett gt30. the m321t sits in the standard postion where the oe turbo is, but the garrett sits in a differnet postion. the m321t turbo is around the £1400 mark and the gt30 is around the £1000 mark BUT you need a special down pipe and uppipe to suit the gt30. just remember if you are going down the 2.0 road u will suffer more turbo lag than the 2.5.
#10
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: workshop tel: 01787 275074
Posts: 837
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The MD321T will be more responsive than a rotated GT30R so would be far better suited to a 2.0ltr but be aware it will need to be pushed to achieve the 450bhp target on V Power or Tescos 99, expect to see around 400bhp at 1.5bar
The beauty of the GT30 is the fact that when you decide you want more it's a very simple job of swapping exhaust housings or the whole unit whereas a standard location turbo is a little more difficult to change and you are limited by the space (or lack of) you have in this location.
The beauty of the GT30 is the fact that when you decide you want more it's a very simple job of swapping exhaust housings or the whole unit whereas a standard location turbo is a little more difficult to change and you are limited by the space (or lack of) you have in this location.
#11
Moderator
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: The Terry Crews of moderation. P P P P P P POWER!!
Posts: 18,687
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ns04
#12
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (22)
I've just gone from a VF28 on a 2.0L to a rotated GT30R on a 2.5L
I have to say that this combination is far from laggy and unresponsive.
Its incredibly driveable throughout the rev range. Off boost its very perky.
If I nail it though all hell breaks loose.
Its equally as quick as the 2.0L vf28 was off the mark. Plus it just keeps on pulling and pulling very very hard indeed.
Its peaking at 1.5 bar to the redline at the moment. When its build with forged internals, sleeved and mapped to 2bar its going to be astounding!!
However going back to the OP's question regarding the 2.0L. The MD321 series has to be top of the list. I've heard nothing but good reports and Terry B had some fabulous results last year.
I have to say that this combination is far from laggy and unresponsive.
Its incredibly driveable throughout the rev range. Off boost its very perky.
If I nail it though all hell breaks loose.
Its equally as quick as the 2.0L vf28 was off the mark. Plus it just keeps on pulling and pulling very very hard indeed.
Its peaking at 1.5 bar to the redline at the moment. When its build with forged internals, sleeved and mapped to 2bar its going to be astounding!!
However going back to the OP's question regarding the 2.0L. The MD321 series has to be top of the list. I've heard nothing but good reports and Terry B had some fabulous results last year.
Last edited by dazdavies; 04 December 2007 at 07:20 PM.
#15
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Edinburgh (ish)
Posts: 8,089
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I've just gone from a VF28 on a 2.0L to a rotated GT30R on a 2.5L
I have to say that this combination is far from laggy and unresponsive.
Its incredibly driveable throughout the rev range. Off boost its very perky.
If I nail it though all hell breaks loose.
Its equally as quick as the 2.0L vf28 was off the mark. Plus it just keeps on pulling and pulling very very hard indeed.
Its peaking at 1.5 bar to the redline at the moment. When its build with forged internals, sleeved and mapped to 2bar its going to be astounding!!
However going back to the OP's question regarding the 2.0L. The MD321 series has to be top of the list. I've heard nothing but good reports and Terry B had some fabulous results last year.
I have to say that this combination is far from laggy and unresponsive.
Its incredibly driveable throughout the rev range. Off boost its very perky.
If I nail it though all hell breaks loose.
Its equally as quick as the 2.0L vf28 was off the mark. Plus it just keeps on pulling and pulling very very hard indeed.
Its peaking at 1.5 bar to the redline at the moment. When its build with forged internals, sleeved and mapped to 2bar its going to be astounding!!
However going back to the OP's question regarding the 2.0L. The MD321 series has to be top of the list. I've heard nothing but good reports and Terry B had some fabulous results last year.
#16
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (22)
Its not been rolling roaded yet. Another scoobyneter had his very similar specced car rolling roaded at scoobyclinic at 1.5 bar and he said it made 486bhp. This I feel was optimistic.
I would imagine that I'm somewhere around the 420 to 450 mark at the moment. But I think more of it as each day passes it just gets better and better.
Roll on sleeves, forged internals and a proper remap!!!
I would imagine that I'm somewhere around the 420 to 450 mark at the moment. But I think more of it as each day passes it just gets better and better.
Roll on sleeves, forged internals and a proper remap!!!
#17
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: South Wales, Scoobless, Type R is gone!
Posts: 3,618
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have no doubt the MD321T is a better turbo but the FP green works out about £750 with current US exchange rates so less than half the price of a new MD.
#18
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Edinburgh (ish)
Posts: 8,089
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Its not been rolling roaded yet. Another scoobyneter had his very similar specced car rolling roaded at scoobyclinic at 1.5 bar and he said it made 486bhp. This I feel was optimistic.
I would imagine that I'm somewhere around the 420 to 450 mark at the moment. But I think more of it as each day passes it just gets better and better.
Roll on sleeves, forged internals and a proper remap!!!
I would imagine that I'm somewhere around the 420 to 450 mark at the moment. But I think more of it as each day passes it just gets better and better.
Roll on sleeves, forged internals and a proper remap!!!
#20
Scooby Regular
Its not been rolling roaded yet. Another scoobyneter had his very similar specced car rolling roaded at scoobyclinic at 1.5 bar and he said it made 486bhp. This I feel was optimistic.
I would imagine that I'm somewhere around the 420 to 450 mark at the moment. But I think more of it as each day passes it just gets better and better.
Roll on sleeves, forged internals and a proper remap!!!
I would imagine that I'm somewhere around the 420 to 450 mark at the moment. But I think more of it as each day passes it just gets better and better.
Roll on sleeves, forged internals and a proper remap!!!
what makes you doubt it? would have been done on there dyno wouldn't it?
#22
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: 335i LAND
Posts: 318
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
[QUOTE= ive got a vf34 turbo which is amazing but having my bottom end rebuilt with forged pistons con rods, [/QUOTE]
hi mate, did your bottom end go? why? miles?
what power were you running?
cheers tim
hi mate, did your bottom end go? why? miles?
what power were you running?
cheers tim
Last edited by SPIDERWRX; 05 December 2007 at 01:44 PM. Reason: 1
#23
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: The right side of 30psi
Posts: 539
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#24
Scooby Regular
never known a dyno dynamcis RR to lie, strange hes says he was told it was spinning the wheels, seen a scoob running 500bhp at the wheels fail to light them up in the dyno, sounds very fishy to me
#26
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Edinburgh (ish)
Posts: 8,089
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#28
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 537
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
bhp 360 engine covered 36k number four piston melted. reason i think is to do with the bottom end being comletely standard, and maybe being mapped to the max on the vf34. all the orignal work was carried out before i owned the car so previous owner might of asked for it to be mapped like that knowing the pistons wouldnt last.
#29
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 537
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
im not going to even compare the two turbos, as the md321T is sweet as a nut. how ever the fp green and the md321H are very very similar, apart from the md is a BB cartridge, but only good for 400 but the green is good for 450 if you have the right mods..
#30
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (20)
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: 8.95 @ 168mph. Zero to 1KM 194.1mph
Posts: 1,150
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Zak at Mocom has done an independent "back to back" test between the MD321T, & FP Green, carried out on his own car.
He has told me that the MD321T spools up between 4-500rpm earlier, and has better throttle response, but both turbos make similar power at the same boost.
I appreciate the MD321T is a few hundred pounds more, but the difference between the turbos is something "you" will appreciate every time you put your foot down !
Mark.
He has told me that the MD321T spools up between 4-500rpm earlier, and has better throttle response, but both turbos make similar power at the same boost.
I appreciate the MD321T is a few hundred pounds more, but the difference between the turbos is something "you" will appreciate every time you put your foot down !
Mark.