Notices
General Technical
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

STi vs standard panel filter

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 11, 2007 | 09:35 PM
  #1  
ade_sti's Avatar
ade_sti
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 874
Likes: 38
From: Spain
Default STi vs standard panel filter

Hi, have read all the posts on this topic and know that tests were done and the STi filter did not make the most power on the dyno, but what is the deal on the road. I have an STi panel filter, had it for about a year and always thought it was better than the standard.

Read all the stuff on here and so changed it for a standard one last week, just to see. I have to say that i am sure that the STi one gives better throttle response and lets the car breath better. Induction noise ios quieter with standard one in and the car also feels a bit sluggish to come on boost. Have cleaned the old Sti filter the best I can and have now put it back and have to say that it is so much better than the new standard one. Has anyone else git any view on this, regarding drivability - not power. As I am sure the Sti is better, and am now going to order a new one - or is it all in my head, and I should just put the standard one back in and the old Sti one in the bin!

Cheers Ade
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2007 | 09:43 PM
  #2  
Northern Nick's Avatar
Northern Nick
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,266
Likes: 0
From: Up-North Like!
Default

Originally Posted by ade_sti
Hi, have read all the posts on this topic and know that tests were done and the STi filter did not make the most power on the dyno, but what is the deal on the road. I have an STi panel filter, had it for about a year and always thought it was better than the standard.

Read all the stuff on here and so changed it for a standard one last week, just to see. I have to say that i am sure that the STi one gives better throttle response and lets the car breath better. Induction noise ios quieter with standard one in and the car also feels a bit sluggish to come on boost. Have cleaned the old Sti filter the best I can and have now put it back and have to say that it is so much better than the new standard one. Has anyone else git any view on this, regarding drivability - not power. As I am sure the Sti is better, and am now going to order a new one - or is it all in my head, and I should just put the standard one back in and the old Sti one in the bin!

Cheers Ade
I'm pretty sure Subaru Technica International wouldn't have fit it in the first place if it wasn't better than the standard filter.

Now whether it is better on your car is a different story.
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2007 | 09:47 PM
  #3  
ade_sti's Avatar
ade_sti
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 874
Likes: 38
From: Spain
Default

Totally agree mate, but would it not make sense that on every impreza it would be better than the standard?
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2007 | 10:02 PM
  #4  
Northern Nick's Avatar
Northern Nick
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,266
Likes: 0
From: Up-North Like!
Default

Well yes and no,

If you've a standard set up than it probably would be better. Like you say, better air flow, better throttle responce. If a car has been mapped to the standard filter then a higher flow filter maybe more of a hinder than a help.

I have fitted a Green WRC cotton weave TSL filter which s suppose to be the only panel filter better than the standard STi panel filter (newage) and AndyF did comment at the high air flow the car had. Not sure if that was good or bad
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2007 | 10:14 PM
  #5  
ade_sti's Avatar
ade_sti
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 874
Likes: 38
From: Spain
Default

car running about 290 bhp /299 torque on prosports rollers last year, so must be mapped. It was owned by a guy who worked at prodrive so god know what was done to it habe owned it for 2 years,- on standard turbo, just decats and hks system - what you saying is that if the filter has better air flow but if the car has not been mapped to this then would not run as well with standard filter? Whould the ecu compensate for small changes in airflow, mixture, even if mapped?

Last edited by ade_sti; Nov 11, 2007 at 10:16 PM. Reason: added a bit
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2007 | 10:25 PM
  #6  
Northern Nick's Avatar
Northern Nick
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,266
Likes: 0
From: Up-North Like!
Default

Yea, I'd guess your car would compensate for small changes like that. I think its more to do with cone filters and CAI kits that affect more.

If the car was set up right on the edge for a standad filter, then putting a higher flow filter would cause a lean mixture, iirc the early import wrx were bad for that wit them being tuned on 102 fuel, on 98 fuel over here, they ran ok if they were bog standard but put an exhaust and filter on, they'd go POP!

How much is a genuine STi filter? You can get a TSL Green WRC for about £30ish
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2007 | 10:31 PM
  #7  
ade_sti's Avatar
ade_sti
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 874
Likes: 38
From: Spain
Default

I had my filter on for over a year and car has run ace. The filters cost bewteen £45 - 60 depending where you go, but only last 12 - 15 k though then need to be put in the bin.

Would get the car on a dyno and get tests with both, but can't be bothered. Is the filter that you have dry or oiled?
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2007 | 10:39 PM
  #8  
Northern Nick's Avatar
Northern Nick
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,266
Likes: 0
From: Up-North Like!
Default

It is lightly oil
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2007 | 10:40 PM
  #9  
ade_sti's Avatar
ade_sti
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 874
Likes: 38
From: Spain
Default

cheers mate, will have a look at this - just a pain having an 00 model with crap maf.
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2007 | 10:48 PM
  #10  
stigaz's Avatar
stigaz
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 667
Likes: 0
From: dundee
Default

not sure what all this is about the sti panel filter,it was the first thing i changed on my my00 sti ,it was just a paper filter,replaced it with a k&n
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2007 | 11:58 PM
  #11  
TonyBurns's Avatar
TonyBurns
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 25,565
Likes: 2
From: 1600cc's of twin scroll fun :)
Default

The "uprated" STi panel filter isnt your normal paper one, you will definately see the difference as it has mesh over the outside.
We tried one out when I owned my spec c, car only had a couple of thousand miles on the clock, ran the car 2 times without the filter (car was running optimax and octane booster) and then changed the filter on the rollers (car was still running so heatsoak ) and she pushed another 12bhp and 15lbs of torque, improvement above 6.5k where on the standard filter she seemed to struggle, that changed after that and she revved freely to
8k
Let you make your mind up if they are any good or not, the filter has a life expectancy of 20k miles and is a service item (change every 2 years)

Tony
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2007 | 12:15 PM
  #12  
ade_sti's Avatar
ade_sti
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 874
Likes: 38
From: Spain
Default

cheers for that Tony - it is not just in my head then!
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2007 | 12:23 PM
  #13  
Elmer Fudpucker's Avatar
Elmer Fudpucker
BANNED
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,941
Likes: 0
From: House
Default

The uprated STi filter I once fitted to my old RB5 stifled the **** out of it,so reverted back to the oem paper affair.Much,much better
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Bazil_SW
Engine Management and ECU Remapping
24
Sep 21, 2015 11:55 PM




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:16 PM.