Notices

Driveability comparison between VF28 and AFP5-20 (TD05-20g)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 18 August 2007, 12:28 AM
  #1  
Mr Footlong
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
Mr Footlong's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Stalking Kate Beckinsale
Posts: 4,265
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Driveability comparison between VF28 and AFP5-20 (TD05-20g)

Hey folks. My new turbo will be coming from Andy F at the end of the month once I give him the cash and we settled on a 20g as the replacement for my VF28. Being a bloke I told him that I wanted as much power as poss while still being mildly sensible. Not being fussy I also would like great punch from 3500 rpm onwards (use this a lot for motorway overtaking and would like to not have to drop to 4th as much ). Now I could ask Andy all this but I have spammed him enough for one week I think and was wondering if the ones amongst us with knowledge in this area could give me their opinions?

Basically what difference in performance/power delivery across the rev band is there between a VF28 and a Andy F TD05-20g? Whether I buy the 18g from him or the 20g they cost the same so he has no vested interest in selling me one or the other .

Cheers,

Nick .
Old 18 August 2007, 05:16 PM
  #2  
Mr Footlong
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
Mr Footlong's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Stalking Kate Beckinsale
Posts: 4,265
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Back to page 1 .
Old 18 August 2007, 05:51 PM
  #3  
Henrik
Scooby Regular
Support Scoobynet!
iTrader: (5)
 
Henrik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: London
Posts: 4,119
Received 145 Likes on 109 Posts
Default

We've got a WRX, so maybe not completely comparable, with a AFP5-20G.

Compared to the standard TD04, the car is rather dead under 3k to be honest but nice kick at 3500 RPM onwards, though. Pootling around town is a bit of a pain, as the car needs to be revved all the time to move, but when you're "going for it" it's fantastic

I don't know if me and my wife being crap at driving, but pulling off fast in first is really hard. With the TD04 getting near perfect starts every time was not a problem, but so far we haven't managed to start quickly once with the 20G. Only tried about 3 times, but still

First gear is completely useless as it's over too fast and it doesn't have time to hit peak boost in 1st either. 2nd gear is slightly better, although that's over in about two something seconds as well (still not hitting peak boost i think). In third the car flies, but then you're already doing 80.

It's a great turbo for hooning about, but I wish I had some more low down torque. Then again, it probably makes almost as much power lower down as it did earlier, but it's just that the top end is so much better now that it feels comparably rubbish, if you see what I mean. The wife, who to be fair drives it more than me anyway, doesn't mind.

Mods include:

* AFP5-20G
* Lateral 3 bolt headers and up-pipe
* PPP sports cat
* decat centre
* resonated centre
* PPP backbox
* Autobahn FMIC
* apexi power induction kit
* walbro 255
* Ecutek remap


Here's a power / torque graph: http://www.bilar.co.uk/subaru/graphs
Old 19 August 2007, 10:30 AM
  #4  
Mr Footlong
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
Mr Footlong's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Stalking Kate Beckinsale
Posts: 4,265
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks for your detailed take on your setup Henrik .

Ooh look, that gets a bump

I am still sorely tempted to change my Hyperflow TMIC to a FMIC but I think that the change to that and the 18/20 will seem like lag city. Hmm, don't want much, great midrange punch and doesn't run out of puff along with instant response.......
Old 19 August 2007, 10:37 AM
  #5  
Mr Footlong
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
Mr Footlong's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Stalking Kate Beckinsale
Posts: 4,265
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Hmm, just looking at your graph is very informative, serious top end turbo.
Old 19 August 2007, 04:29 PM
  #6  
harvey
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (48)
 
harvey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Darlington
Posts: 10,419
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I have a VF 28 spooling to 1 bar in 4th at 3,150 rpm. It typically runs at 1.3 bar dropping to 1.2bar. My own TD05-o6 20G(if that is what you are comparing) by comparisson, will hit 1 bar at 3350 rpm. The VF 28, a roller bearing turbo is a bit more responsive low down. The TD05-06 20 G is sleve bearing and runs to 1.7 bar max and will probably run a bit more but there is no point. Incidentally it is running 422 bhp which is a high figure for an o5-06 20g. Typical 05-06 20G that I have seen on the rollers will make around 385 bhp which in similar circumstances is 50-60 bhp ahead of the VF28 on similar mods.

Last edited by harvey; 19 August 2007 at 04:33 PM.
Old 19 August 2007, 05:25 PM
  #7  
Mr Footlong
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
Mr Footlong's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Stalking Kate Beckinsale
Posts: 4,265
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks Harvey.

Ok, heres a brainless question, but one that might just make my decision for me.

Just for example (of course ). Sitting at approx 70-80mph in fifth, behind a queue of cars not going in to the completely empty slow lane for no good reason, all being held up by a Saab, BMW or Audi . Suddenly everyone gets out of my way and I put my foot to the floor, staying in fifth. In general, which turbo is going to pass the traffic more quickly, the 18 or the 20?. If I dropped to 4th instead would the results be the same?

Silly question I know, but had to at least put it down and see what folks say .

Trending Topics

Old 19 August 2007, 08:12 PM
  #8  
harvey
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (48)
 
harvey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Darlington
Posts: 10,419
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

So the leading question is, what revs do you see in 5th at 70-80mph and what are the revs in4th at that speed? Let me know and I will give you my experience.
Different models= different diffs and gear ratios coupled with different tyre combinations so there can be very signifigant differences in response.
Old 19 August 2007, 09:48 PM
  #9  
Mr Footlong
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
Mr Footlong's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Stalking Kate Beckinsale
Posts: 4,265
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I won't be driving for a couple of days but if memory serves the speedo shows 90 at 4000 in 5th (speedo reads a bit high compared to GPS so prob low 80's to mid 80's tops). Just an educated guess would be useful to be honest
Old 19 August 2007, 10:02 PM
  #10  
Henrik
Scooby Regular
Support Scoobynet!
iTrader: (5)
 
Henrik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: London
Posts: 4,119
Received 145 Likes on 109 Posts
Default

I would think that from that rev onwards the 20g would have the edge, and the 18g below (but that's just my guess)
Old 19 August 2007, 11:50 PM
  #11  
harvey
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (48)
 
harvey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Darlington
Posts: 10,419
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Below, around 3,500 rpm the 05-06 20G needs a gear change if you want the fastest get away. Above 4,000 rpm the 05-06 20G will just walk away. The transition is somewhere between 3500 and 4000 rpm which is why I was interested in your geared speed figures.
The VF28 is very nice to drive around town and on tight roads but the 05-06 20G comes into its own with a vicious surge of power where higher speeds are attained.
Old 20 August 2007, 02:12 PM
  #12  
GazTheHat
Scooby Regular
 
GazTheHat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: 392/361 MY04 STi
Posts: 7,638
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Between the two, the 18g is a better "real-world" turbo. Not the mentioned lag issues. Depends how you drive though, the 20g owners have warned you.
Old 21 August 2007, 08:34 PM
  #13  
Mr Footlong
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
Mr Footlong's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Stalking Kate Beckinsale
Posts: 4,265
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Cheers guys, the info is most useful and I will make my final decision shortly .
Old 22 August 2007, 03:19 PM
  #14  
harvey
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (48)
 
harvey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Darlington
Posts: 10,419
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Gaz, is that from your experience of driving 18g and 20g turbos.
The step up from a VF28 to an 18g is perhaps not enough to make the change worthwhile in terms of added performance versus cost.
Old 22 August 2007, 07:52 PM
  #15  
GTscoob
Scooby Newbie
 
GTscoob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

VF28 is a lot like the VF29 I had on my old USDM motor. I'd get 19psi by 3100 revs or so. Its my favorite turbo for a 2.0 as far as all around response, I've driven other cars with VF30s and VF39s but the 29 felt better at any point in the powerband.
Old 23 August 2007, 01:28 PM
  #16  
rasonline
Scooby Regular
 
rasonline's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: South East Africa
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The VF28 came on the STi 5 and sti 6 models. Later sti 6 models came with the vf29.

vf28 is also very similar to the vf24 (almost exactly the same actually).

On my STi 6 i had the vf28 which was brilliant for driveability. But also consdier gear ratios, as i have shorter gears than the wrx. So 3,500rpm in 1st or 2nd just to get the turbos in their zone wasn't issue.. short-gearing.

I've recently changed over to a Garret T3 T04E turbo.. which i think is bigger than a TD05-20G? But still tuning the car so can't comment on setups yet. Will keep updated.. just to confuse the issue even more
Old 23 August 2007, 06:07 PM
  #17  
Andy.F
Subaru Tuning Specialist
 
Andy.F's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: 7.74 @179 mph 1/4 mile - road legal
Posts: 6,654
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

VF 24 (similar to 28) against a 20G on the same car.

This was mapped specifically to protect the UK box, ie regulating the midrange torque output.


Click to enlarge
Old 23 August 2007, 07:15 PM
  #18  
Mr Footlong
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
Mr Footlong's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Stalking Kate Beckinsale
Posts: 4,265
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Wow that graph makes it look like there is no real reason not to get the 20G! I had already decided to stick with your judgement on this one but that that clear image is the icing on the cake tbh .

Thanks.
Old 23 August 2007, 10:28 PM
  #19  
Henrik
Scooby Regular
Support Scoobynet!
iTrader: (5)
 
Henrik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: London
Posts: 4,119
Received 145 Likes on 109 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Andy.F
VF 24 (similar to 28) against a 20G on the same car.

This was mapped specifically to protect the UK box, ie regulating the midrange torque output.


Click to enlarge
Which one of the maps was regulated?

Also, out of interest, have you got a similar graph for a standard uk wrx with a td04 (prior to remap)?
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
GeeDee
Subaru
18
04 March 2020 07:10 PM
ATWRX
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
88
01 February 2016 07:28 PM
Danowrx
General Technical
9
23 September 2015 02:48 PM
mdb8899
General Technical
5
20 September 2015 05:48 PM
InTurbo
General Technical
0
19 September 2015 02:16 PM



Quick Reply: Driveability comparison between VF28 and AFP5-20 (TD05-20g)



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:04 PM.