boost.
#2
I have the same with my AVCR/Commander although its no where near as different with yours.
I found that using silicon vacuum piping to the MAP sensors made it worse so I went back to OE ones (maybe the silicon ones expand slightly under pressure?). I would also clip the vacuum hoses in place where they attach to the manifold and sensors to eliminate any minor leaks
I have found through experimenting, that the PFC/Commander seems so be most accurate using the Subaru OE MAP sensor
Generally mine will show at peak boost:
AVCR: 1.66Bar
Commander 1.67Bar
so within +/- 0.01 of each other
Hope that helps
Chris
I found that using silicon vacuum piping to the MAP sensors made it worse so I went back to OE ones (maybe the silicon ones expand slightly under pressure?). I would also clip the vacuum hoses in place where they attach to the manifold and sensors to eliminate any minor leaks
I have found through experimenting, that the PFC/Commander seems so be most accurate using the Subaru OE MAP sensor
Generally mine will show at peak boost:
AVCR: 1.66Bar
Commander 1.67Bar
so within +/- 0.01 of each other
Hope that helps
Chris
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
john banks
Drivetrain
48
01 September 2002 10:44 PM