Notices

Remapping for standard unleaded?!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 17 June 2007, 03:17 PM
  #1  
silent running
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
silent running's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: East coast.
Posts: 3,957
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Remapping for standard unleaded?!

For a number of reasons I'm toying with the idea of having my Power FC remapped for standard unleaded rather than V-Power which is what I use at present. Firstly my FMIC totally controls charge temps under any conditions. Secondly V-Power is now over a quid a litre and as petrol prices rise in general it's going to be super unleaded users who get the ****tiest end of the stick. Lastly, I am planning more driving on the continent and super unleaded varies in octane from 97 to 100 depending on country/brand - I need to be able to fill up anywhere, anytime and not worry about it.

Does anyone have experience of what kind of a performance and fuel economy variation a Power FC equipped Impreza will take when downgrading from V-Power to standard unleaded? Spec in brief is MY98/TD05-16G/440's/FMIC with K&N cone/ported up-pipe & headers/everything heat wrapped inlet and exhaust side/oil catch tank/7B plugs/Walbro pump/adjustable FPR(3.5 bar).

Cheers
Old 17 June 2007, 05:07 PM
  #2  
scooby0809
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (11)
 
scooby0809's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Basingstoke, Hants
Posts: 596
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

would be interested in the answer aswell for the same reasons!btt
Old 17 June 2007, 05:36 PM
  #3  
silent running
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
silent running's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: East coast.
Posts: 3,957
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Not just me then. TBH I'm not too bothered about my Scoob going slower than it does at the moment. Even at 0.8 bar which is my lowest current boost setting, it's plenty fast enough for UK roads, and if I need to put my foot down, I've every confidence that it won't overheat or do anything weird.

So I'm really wondering if lower octane fuel might actually give me worse fuel economy or using different makes of standard unleaded might do something odd to the engine. At the moment it has an uninterrupted diet of the finest road fuel money can buy, but will it still be ok if mapped for the normal stuff that I run my wife's Yaris on?
Old 17 June 2007, 05:57 PM
  #4  
fireblade37
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
fireblade37's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 403
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by scooby0809
would be interested in the answer aswell for the same reasons!btt
=============================

Same here, off to bobs next month for a map tweak and i was also considering swapping to a 97 ron.

Silent.. i have near enough the same spec as yourself apart from the fpr, is it worth putting one on, is there any benefit from doing so?

Cheers
Old 17 June 2007, 06:41 PM
  #5  
silent running
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
silent running's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: East coast.
Posts: 3,957
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Well I had the standard FPR on it when I fitted a VF35 with 440's. It was OK up to 1.4 bar and there was still a little headroom, but now I've fitted the TD05 and the bottom line is, it's a higher flowing turbo even though roughly the same size. I don't like running injector duties in the 90's so it was either swap for 550's or fit an adjustable regulator. I've got a good set of 440's in there that were tested as flowing 500cc at 3.5 bar, so I'll fit the SARD regulator later this month , then set it at 3.5 bar when it goes for the remap.
Old 17 June 2007, 07:17 PM
  #6  
Welloilbeefhooked
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Welloilbeefhooked's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Sheffield
Posts: 3,577
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'm looking at LPG through Tinley Tech to help fuel consumption.

Its about £900 for a kit that will run most scoobs. Can be set to switch back to petrol at a preset rpm, say 4k. Still need to find out if I can get it to boost switch which shouldnt be too difficult. I dont want LPG and boost!!
Old 17 June 2007, 07:34 PM
  #7  
silent running
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
silent running's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: East coast.
Posts: 3,957
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I'll be interested to see how you get on. LPG's still cheap, although of course if it ever gets popular, it'll come up to the same price as unleaded, just like diesel did.
Old 17 June 2007, 08:15 PM
  #8  
Scott.T@PolarPerformance
Scooby Regular
 
Scott.T@PolarPerformance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: East Sussex - www.polarperformance.co.uk
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I would set the Unleaded boost slightly lower i.e 1 bar instead of 1.2

You will then hit a different load scale on the map which you can adjust to be suitable for the regular unleaded.
This leaves the rows normally hit at 1.2bar and SUL untouched so you can switch in/out as petrol is changed.
Old 17 June 2007, 08:52 PM
  #9  
silent running
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
silent running's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: East coast.
Posts: 3,957
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

So I have a 1.4 bar map on my Power FC at the moment but I'm running at 0.8 bar at present, pending a remap to suit my new TD05. So it would be possible to have the map at 1.4 bar expecting to run V-Power say for track work, and then a tamer map at 1.2 bar for normal unleaded. And never the twain shall meet...as long as I make sure I only use the 1.4 bar setting with a full tank of V-Power?
Old 17 June 2007, 08:58 PM
  #10  
funkyspider
Scooby Regular
 
funkyspider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Lancashire & District Subaru Owners
Posts: 1,335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Wouldnt running a TD05 have a negative effect on ecconomy due to the later and more aggressive spool up than smaller turbo's. I always though turbo assisted engines tended to be pretty inefficient at lower revs if completely off boost, but at their most efficient when the turbo was providing a little assistance (obviously not when at full boost lol). I could be talking bollox however
Old 17 June 2007, 11:11 PM
  #11  
Jolly Green Monster
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
 
Jolly Green Monster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: ECU Mapping - www.JollyGreenMonster.co.uk
Posts: 16,548
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I do silly mileages in my car and run it on which ever fuel takes my fancy and tweak accordingly.. if you want to run anything over 1.2bar then you end up removing a reasonable chunk of timing for 95ron and the power reduction is very noticable, on my car anyway.. around 1.2bar it notices less so but probably 10~20bhp..
The play off between boost and timing is too heavy on the timing side.

I have been for a number of years running 1~1.2bar on 95ron and more boost than that on super unleaded, altering the 1~1.2bar part of the map to take the 95ron fuel.

Fuel economy is actually slightly better on super when trying to save fuel and drive sensibly. .

This is on a PowerFc.. If had it mapped in with two boost two fuels on an ecu that altered the timing itself like original ecu with ecutek or similar it would need resetting between to reset the advance multiplier..

Simon
Old 17 June 2007, 11:28 PM
  #12  
dan83590
Scooby Regular
 
dan83590's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,214
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by funkyspider
Wouldnt running a TD05 have a negative effect on ecconomy due to the later and more aggressive spool up than smaller turbo's. I always though turbo assisted engines tended to be pretty inefficient at lower revs if completely off boost, but at their most efficient when the turbo was providing a little assistance (obviously not when at full boost lol). I could be talking bollox however
You could well be right. If you do some reseach the turbo was acutualy designed to save fuel. Power was a by-product. Sensible driving WILL help Economy. More boost = more fuel dependent on the map.. Anyone?
Old 18 June 2007, 05:18 PM
  #13  
silent running
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
silent running's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: East coast.
Posts: 3,957
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

So I could keep the full strength map at 1.2 bar and above and have the timing pulled at 0.8-1.0 bar for economy mode, then simply set boost as necessary.
Old 18 June 2007, 05:54 PM
  #14  
Jolly Green Monster
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
 
Jolly Green Monster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: ECU Mapping - www.JollyGreenMonster.co.uk
Posts: 16,548
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Yes.. however.. you need the car to be running on 95ron to map it for the 95ron part of the map.. then another mapping session on the 99ron to do the higher boost.. or some guess work / checking needs to be carried out.

Simon
Old 18 June 2007, 10:09 PM
  #15  
silent running
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
silent running's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: East coast.
Posts: 3,957
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Spot on Simon, many thanks!
Old 18 June 2007, 10:57 PM
  #16  
scooby0809
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (11)
 
scooby0809's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Basingstoke, Hants
Posts: 596
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

thanks chaps! more food for thought!
Old 22 June 2007, 05:16 PM
  #17  
silent running
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
silent running's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: East coast.
Posts: 3,957
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Quick update. Just as a little experiment I ran my tank of V-Power halfway down then filled it up with 30 litres of standard Shell unleaded - a not insignificant saving of £2 on half a tank. People say 'what's £2', but I used to say what's a fiver when I used to smoke. It all adds up.

Anyway, on this half V-Power/half standard brew I've had not a sniff of knock at all, under my normal driving conditions and hot weather. I'll run this lot down and then fill up with a full tank of 95 octane and see what happens then.

Bear in mind this is at my minimum 0.8 bar setting that I am currently using everyday. Max boost is 1.4 on V-Power.
Old 22 June 2007, 10:01 PM
  #18  
Jolly Green Monster
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
 
Jolly Green Monster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: ECU Mapping - www.JollyGreenMonster.co.uk
Posts: 16,548
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Firstly do you know the powerfc detects knock? ie. you have seen a higher knock recorded when the car has detted before?

what type of driving have you done to ensure it is not detting?

You will need to do a couple of tanks to get pure 95
Old 23 June 2007, 09:08 AM
  #19  
silent running
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
silent running's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: East coast.
Posts: 3,957
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Yes it definitely does detect it when it happens. I've done normal cruising, stop-start traffic driving, hard runs through the gears so far. Still need to do a fast motorway cruise in 5th.
Old 24 September 2007, 01:17 AM
  #20  
Welloilbeefhooked
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Welloilbeefhooked's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Sheffield
Posts: 3,577
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Simon, and others of course,

When you say map the 95ron part, do you mean just the on boost rows or do you mean everything from there back down to row 1 on the Apexi?

Just considering a 95ron @ 1bar /98ron @1.4 bar map.

Wayne.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Abx
Subaru
22
09 January 2016 05:42 PM
blackieblob
ScoobyNet General
2
02 October 2015 05:34 PM
sedge69
Wanted
0
01 October 2015 09:44 PM
shorty87
Wheels And Tyres For Sale
0
29 September 2015 02:18 PM
shorty87
Other Marques
0
25 September 2015 08:52 PM



Quick Reply: Remapping for standard unleaded?!



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:53 AM.