Notices

Breather VTA-Block off PCV or not ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 19 April 2007, 12:06 AM
  #1  
340BHP-WRX
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
340BHP-WRX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Gloucestershire
Posts: 2,541
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Breather VTA-Block off PCV or not ?

Im going to vent all 3 of my breathers using 3 seperate pipes-2 for each of the cam breathers and 1 for the crankcase breather.
My original plan was to block off the PCV valve but I cant make my mind up whether this is a good or bad thing !!
Anyone got any ideas ?
Old 19 April 2007, 01:00 PM
  #2  
jasonius
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
jasonius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Half way up
Posts: 4,791
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Blocked my PCV, and ran two hoses, 0ne 19mm (iirc) from block and one 17mm (iirc) from branched rocker covers down under finishing just above/behind rear axle, ie VTA..

Been like it 18 months no problems..
Old 20 April 2007, 10:31 PM
  #3  
silent running
Scooby Regular
 
silent running's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: East coast.
Posts: 3,957
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I've got a 'green' system that fully recirculates back into the inlet as intended, my catch tank simply intercepts the crankcase breather-to-inlet pipe line.

I tried it with the PCV blocked and found the tank and the pipes were getting absolutely filthy and filled really quick. Reconnected the PCV line and it performance was identical, but much cleaner because it was collecting the oil only when on boost, when it actually matters. IMHO disconnecting the PCV is pointless as it just means that when you're off boost your crankcase has no decent vacuum. It basically then saves all that filth up for when you do put your foot down, meaning your catch tank has to do loads more work.
Old 20 April 2007, 10:51 PM
  #4  
340BHP-WRX
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
340BHP-WRX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Gloucestershire
Posts: 2,541
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by silent running
I've got a 'green' system that fully recirculates back into the inlet as intended, my catch tank simply intercepts the crankcase breather-to-inlet pipe line.

I tried it with the PCV blocked and found the tank and the pipes were getting absolutely filthy and filled really quick. Reconnected the PCV line and it performance was identical, but much cleaner because it was collecting the oil only when on boost, when it actually matters. IMHO disconnecting the PCV is pointless as it just means that when you're off boost your crankcase has no decent vacuum. It basically then saves all that filth up for when you do put your foot down, meaning your catch tank has to do loads more work.
What boost are you running mate ?
Old 21 April 2007, 06:54 AM
  #5  
silent running
Scooby Regular
 
silent running's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: East coast.
Posts: 3,957
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

1.4 bar. On my green system my catch tank is regularly collecting oil sludge, return pipe to the inlet is clean as a whistle, not a spot of oil anywhere in the inlet tract at all.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
33
29 August 2017 07:18 PM
JonMc
Wanted
10
02 October 2015 08:03 PM
Ganz1983
Subaru
5
02 October 2015 09:22 AM
ScottyPPP
Subaru Parts
4
27 September 2015 07:26 PM



Quick Reply: Breather VTA-Block off PCV or not ?



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:29 AM.