Notices

17 MPG??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 14 December 2003, 06:18 PM
  #1  
Derek FKS 85
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Derek FKS 85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Beautiful Edinburgh
Posts: 380
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Just measured my town running fuel consumption of Optimax today and it's 17 MPG!

I am not heavy footed and rarely bring the turbo in in the town. Could there be a problem somewhere? It appears to drive fine enough although on light acceleration there seems to be very slight surging, as if the turbo spools up and then stops, spoools up again etc etc.

Maybe I'm wrong but I would have expected around 25 MPG the way it's driven.

Help chaps please this'll kill my wallet if it goes on much longer!!
Old 14 December 2003, 06:24 PM
  #2  
zhastaph
Scooby Regular
 
zhastaph's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Isle of Wight
Posts: 2,720
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking

25 MPG


Yeah feckin right.

I reckon I'm well under 20mgp. (MY00 classic, with decat no other mods)

I once got about 30mpg on the motorway
Old 14 December 2003, 08:10 PM
  #3  
Kane
Scooby Regular
 
Kane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 512
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

If your worried about fuel dont buy a 4wd turbo sportscar...:-)

I never think twice about my fuel because i realised the implications when i bought my beast and love every min i am in it.

Its normal mpg your getting...maybe think about buying a day to day diesel car and have the scooby as the second car, my sccoby is the second car..so maybe dont hit me wallet as much as yours..
Old 14 December 2003, 08:34 PM
  #4  
alanjack
Scooby Regular
 
alanjack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

I wish I got 17 MPG

Just this week I got 95miles to a full tank
Old 14 December 2003, 09:01 PM
  #5  
Derek FKS 85
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Derek FKS 85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Beautiful Edinburgh
Posts: 380
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

I do know what I bought and I did expect heavier fuel consumption than I was used to, but I don't drive the car hard in town and two of my friends have exactly the same car and get far better consumption than I do so there IS something not right. I can do without the 'buy a diesel if you want good fuel consumption' comments, you are missing the point. Thank you.
Old 14 December 2003, 09:11 PM
  #6  
H18JGM
Scooby Regular
 
H18JGM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question

What model do you have m8?

Old 14 December 2003, 09:15 PM
  #7  
lordharding
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
lordharding's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: cumbria
Posts: 6,802
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Cool

I have a MYoo and to be honest that all i can get in the town


Buy a diesel whoops sorry someone said that one
Old 14 December 2003, 09:22 PM
  #8  
zhastaph
Scooby Regular
 
zhastaph's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Isle of Wight
Posts: 2,720
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking

I can do without the 'buy a diesel if you want good fuel consumption' comments, you are missing the point
I don't think he woz taking the ****, it seemed quite a serious comment.

Personally my car almost never sees a motorway, and that's the sort of mileage I get, whether I've been hoofing it or not, on a full tank (about 40 odd quids worth) I expect to get 220-230 miles, it never changes whether the weathers bin bad or not.

If you really do believe your vehicle is at fault other people may be able to suggest something. When you say a "slight surging", exactly what do you mean? That the power suddenly comes in and then drops off again, or just that the power suddenly comes in?
Old 14 December 2003, 09:45 PM
  #9  
Derek FKS 85
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Derek FKS 85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Beautiful Edinburgh
Posts: 380
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

It's a 00MY no engine mods yet other than an ITG filter.
It's almost as if you are playing with the throtle...on and off on and off...... very slight but it's there.
My mate has a 98MY with 285 BHP and gets 24-26 in town. My one is standard so should get at least the same. I am hoping that the de-cat next week helps.
Old 14 December 2003, 09:49 PM
  #10  
dnb
Scooby Regular
 
dnb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: oustide the asylum?
Posts: 3,306
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Could be the lambda sensor is getting ready to die, or the coolant temp sensor is acting up. Both of these will cause rich running and possible hesitation.

Are the exhaust pipes sooted up?

PS My rattly old MY96 gets 23 to 25 mpg in town

[Edited by dnb - 12/14/2003 9:49:49 PM]
Old 14 December 2003, 09:50 PM
  #11  
lordharding
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
lordharding's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: cumbria
Posts: 6,802
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Wink

decat will make you smile and your reear passengers deaf !!

never noticed better consumption with mine as you boot it even more to hear the noise
Old 14 December 2003, 09:51 PM
  #12  
stevebt
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (8)
 
stevebt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 16,732
Received 33 Likes on 19 Posts
Post

25 mpg i couldnt even get that when my car was standard 17 mpg is close enough to what i get, i would say £20 worth of optimax gets about 50-60 miles around the streets if your lucky
Old 14 December 2003, 10:28 PM
  #13  
tailfin
Scooby Regular
 
tailfin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs up

I wish I got 17 MPG in town
average on my00 is 220 on a full tank
Old 14 December 2003, 10:33 PM
  #14  
nom
Scooby Senior
 
nom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 2,602
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

If you're getting less than 25mpg on a long & gentle journey, your lambda's knackered. 20mpg is not normal or expected for typical driving! Lambda sensors should be replaced every 30k or 3 years - they are a consumable. As they age, they under-read, causing the ECU to overfuel on cruise - bad for economy, the pocket & the bores, over time!
If your 'on boost' performance is fine, it's quite possible your lambda's knackered. I'd get it sorted if I were you If your 'on boost' performance has gone a bit odd, look for leaks & stuff
Old 14 December 2003, 10:33 PM
  #15  
zhastaph
Scooby Regular
 
zhastaph's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Isle of Wight
Posts: 2,720
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

My mate has a 98MY with 285 BHP and gets 24-26 in town.
Also bear in mind that Scoob's do run rich from standard and thus guzzle more, if your mate has had ECU work done then it is likely to be more economical.

I agree with DNB on the Lambda as this measures the mixture as it comes out of the engine. As these fail your engine then tends to run rich. It's my understanding that they start to go after about 30k.
Old 15 December 2003, 07:41 AM
  #16  
Derek FKS 85
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Derek FKS 85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Beautiful Edinburgh
Posts: 380
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Thanks for the tip guys, I'll change the lambda and see if that makes a difference.
Any idea how much they are and how easy to change. I would assume it's just a swop out and no re-setting of anything needed?

[Edited by Derek FKS 85 - 12/15/2003 7:42:28 AM]
Old 15 December 2003, 09:16 AM
  #17  
The_Judge
Scooby Regular
 
The_Judge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Out of darkness cometh light
Posts: 1,457
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Motor Factors in Edinburgh You don't need to, but if you reset the ECU, it would also give you the opportunity to see if your MAF's OK.
Old 15 December 2003, 09:41 AM
  #18  
Derek FKS 85
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Derek FKS 85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Beautiful Edinburgh
Posts: 380
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

How easy is it to re-set the ECU?
Old 15 December 2003, 10:21 AM
  #19  
The_Judge
Scooby Regular
 
The_Judge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Out of darkness cometh light
Posts: 1,457
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Piece of cake mate! Click here and follow the instructions...
Old 15 December 2003, 10:31 AM
  #20  
Derek FKS 85
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Derek FKS 85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Beautiful Edinburgh
Posts: 380
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Mmmmmmm..... a bit dodgy for me to do that Judge but thanks anyway mate!
Old 15 December 2003, 12:42 PM
  #21  
scoobsteve
Scooby Regular
 
scoobsteve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

I also have an my00, and found that the best i've ever managed is 240 miles to a tank, but it's generally less.

I'm led to believe that the 802 ecu, over fuels quite considerably. Good for knock, bad for economy! Also I experienced the hesitation on acceleration, mainly in higher gears. Is this the same as you?

I changed to a Tek 2 ecu on Saturday, and this seems to have stopped the hesitation. So i think it was a trait of the standard map.

Hope this helps
Old 15 December 2003, 01:12 PM
  #22  
The_Judge
Scooby Regular
 
The_Judge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Out of darkness cometh light
Posts: 1,457
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Why dodgy?! It's dead easy, honest...

As for the hesitation and over-fuelling, you're right, they are known AE802 characteristics. A manual boost controller can help. It's a hell of a lot cheaper than a re-map, although admittedly not as safe. It helps my taking advantage of the slightly richer fuelling, and also bypasses the boost solenoid, which can be one of the things that causes hesitation (mine did anyway!). Just be cautious, as you're taking control away from the ECU. A few gauges are awlays a good idea...
Old 15 December 2003, 01:32 PM
  #23  
babber
Scooby Regular
 
babber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,370
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wink

I had this with my old MY 00 and changed the AE802 ECU for an older (but better) AE801 ECU. Not sure if the fuel economy got better, but the hesitation disappeared. Is the hesitation around the 3 to 4 k rpm range ? I would go along to your local meet and ask someone with a MY 99 if you can try there ECU for 30 mins or so

If your near to Bristol, you welcome to try mine

I've since got rid of the MY 00 and bought a MY 99. I had a Tek 2.5 (John Banks) fitted and can honestly say car is returning 32 MPG on a run with air con on So I get better performance and as a result fuel economy is increased over the stock MY 99 ECU and MY 99 PPP ECU If you keep the car for a few years, the remap is the way forward. A AE801 will set you back £150 second hand. A Tek 1 flashed onto your AE802 will make a hell of a difference

Hope this helps, Phill

Old 15 December 2003, 02:04 PM
  #24  
Derek FKS 85
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Derek FKS 85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Beautiful Edinburgh
Posts: 380
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Thanks guys.
I went to my local dealer at lunchtime and he basically confirmed that the hesitation is a trait of the car, which I am quite happy with. I also bought a lambda sensor which I'll fit tonight. He also said that this was the most likely cause of poor consumtion.

Hope I havn't wasted my £104!!!!!!!!

[Edited by Derek FKS 85 - 12/15/2003 2:05:20 PM]
Old 15 December 2003, 02:09 PM
  #25  
The_Judge
Scooby Regular
 
The_Judge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Out of darkness cometh light
Posts: 1,457
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

422 miles to a tank?!?!?!? You sure that's right? You'd better not let Gordon Brown here about it. He'd probably impose excise duty on Tek remaps...!
Old 15 December 2003, 02:39 PM
  #26  
babber
Scooby Regular
 
babber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,370
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wink

As I said 32 MPG consistantly, but I have to take it quite easy and cruise around 80 to 90 MPH

I never run the tank empty, as I don't like doing that, but will see 320 to 340 on 7/8 of a tanks In fairness though around a track I can get that as low as 7 MPG

Phill
Old 15 December 2003, 03:37 PM
  #27  
The_Judge
Scooby Regular
 
The_Judge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Out of darkness cometh light
Posts: 1,457
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

I suppose if my willpower was good enough to drive around without invoking the turbo, I could probably get more out of a tank... but it isn't, so I'll have to make do with 220 ish out of 50 litres.
Old 15 December 2003, 03:53 PM
  #28  
babber
Scooby Regular
 
babber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,370
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wink

PS MY 99 / 00 have 60 litre tanks

Phill
Old 15 December 2003, 04:02 PM
  #29  
The_Judge
Scooby Regular
 
The_Judge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Out of darkness cometh light
Posts: 1,457
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Indeed, but I never let mine run below 10 litres, so my calcs are based on 50 litres...
Old 15 December 2003, 04:12 PM
  #30  
Jiggerypokery
Scooby Regular
 
Jiggerypokery's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Location: Location:
Posts: 1,097
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Thankfully the 03's are more efficient! I get 30mpg easily on a long run, even when averaging 50mph on winding roads in Scotland.
Sorry, I know this isn't helping your case, but it's useful info.


Quick Reply: 17 MPG??



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:44 AM.