Notices

Has anyone tried this extremely cheap Mod?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07 June 2003, 08:13 PM
  #1  
*Sonic*
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
*Sonic*'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: R.I.P Piphead, at least you are home now :(
Posts: 10,026
Received 15 Likes on 10 Posts
Post

Just saw this, and wondered if anyone on here has tried it, or even if we have this 'restrictor' in place

http://www.scoobymods.com/forums/sho...&threadid=1564


Steve
Old 08 June 2003, 11:09 AM
  #2  
Jamesn
Scooby Regular
 
Jamesn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Sonic,


This is raved about as the "free boost upgrade" on the 200 SX site.
I have heard that the restrictor is to prevent boost spikes occuring which can damage the engine.

Better to just fit a Dawes - connects between the same two places.


J.
Old 08 June 2003, 12:04 PM
  #3  
*Sonic*
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
*Sonic*'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: R.I.P Piphead, at least you are home now :(
Posts: 10,026
Received 15 Likes on 10 Posts
Post

yep I thought so, I got a dawes in the cupboard, had it on the car, but took it off again temporarily

Might stick it back on, now I got all my gauges & knocklonk working etc

Steve
Old 08 June 2003, 01:02 PM
  #4  
Turbo_Steve
Scooby Regular
 
Turbo_Steve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,355
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool

The restrictor is there to "smooth out" the ECU control of boost.
With a larger restrictor, boost tends to grow quicker, and spike briefly before the ECU gets it under control.

You are unlikely to cause any damage, but you ARE likely to hit fuel cut on cold days at high load.

The Dawes (which goes between the bleed nipple on the turbo, and the actuator, NOT connected to the factory plumbing) is generally a better solution as you retain a degree of control: even if the ECU doesn't.

Changing the restrictor CAN have benefits on a re-mapped engine.
Old 08 June 2003, 01:47 PM
  #5  
*Sonic*
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
*Sonic*'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: R.I.P Piphead, at least you are home now :(
Posts: 10,026
Received 15 Likes on 10 Posts
Post

Thanks Steve

the biggest thing is Dawes 50 quid, new restrictor (bigger) about 60 pence

Old 09 June 2003, 04:00 PM
  #6  
4wheel
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
4wheel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 542
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

where can you get this bigger restrictor pipe and will it work on my 95 wrx import r u sure it doesnt damage engne in any way
Old 10 June 2003, 01:18 AM
  #7  
StickyMicky
Scooby Regular
 
StickyMicky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Zed Ess Won Hay Tee
Posts: 21,611
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

hmmm i just replaced all them pipes today with nice red silicone ones and i dont think there was a restrictor there?

Trending Topics

Old 10 June 2003, 09:31 AM
  #8  
ZIPPY
Scooby Regular
 
ZIPPY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,780
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

It does improve spool up especially on the 3 MY01 cars i've fitted it too.
80p each and 2 minutes to change, what more do you want.

Zippy
Old 10 June 2003, 01:30 PM
  #9  
Miniman
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Miniman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 995
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Where can you get them over here?
Old 10 June 2003, 02:32 PM
  #10  
WRXKM
Scooby Regular
 
WRXKM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 280
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

I have this in mine....

I am running Nos and only had problem with boost spiking (Hitting boost limiter) only when nos came in in 5th gear!

Used jet out of Webber DCOE Carbs and works extremmely well

Give it a try they are only pence
Old 10 June 2003, 03:01 PM
  #11  
4wheel
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
4wheel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 542
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

where from
Old 11 June 2003, 02:29 AM
  #12  
submannz
Scooby Regular
 
submannz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 799
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Yep, I have many plans on how to use these restrictors, if anyone interested I will post them on my web site.
Old 11 June 2003, 09:49 AM
  #13  
StickyMicky
Scooby Regular
 
StickyMicky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Zed Ess Won Hay Tee
Posts: 21,611
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

link lol?
Old 11 June 2003, 03:45 PM
  #14  
WRXKM
Scooby Regular
 
WRXKM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 280
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

It was Teeside motor factors who fitted mine...
Would imagine most places that deal with carbs wil.l have them in

work a treat
Old 11 June 2003, 06:33 PM
  #15  
Joth
Scooby Regular
 
Joth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

I tried this in my MY98 JDM Forester, first of all the restrictors look nothing alike, mine was a brass insert in the hose between the compressor nozzle and the T junction, really small hole, less than a millimeter. I made two alternate restrictors with bigger and smaller holes, the smaller hole, less restriction, lowered my boost from 10psi to 7 psi, the smaller hole bigger restriction allowed it to spike up to about 13psi on acceleration and gear change but would go to 10psi when holding boost. Eventually I just went back to the stock.
But this is of course stock boost. No mods there
Old 11 June 2003, 07:24 PM
  #16  
StanS
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
StanS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Norfolk
Posts: 2,239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking

Did it on my UK98 about two and a half years ago and ran it for about 18 months Used a 0.8mm orifice (part number22326AA260), and gradually drilled it out until it gave me the peak boost I wanted. This was achieved at 1.0mm. I used it with a second hand ppp ecu (£200), and with a decat exhaust and K&N filter (rest was std) - achieved 278BHP/268ft-lbs on RR with P1 achieving 289BHP running after me (for comparison).
It peaked at 21-22psi, and tailed off (thanks to ecu) to about 14psi at 6k rpm. Peak boost came in at 3k,so was excellent on the road. I used SUL and octane boost.
Then, "experts" said 280BHP on std internals was crazy !!!!
Now we have 400+BHP on std ! So much for experts !
I had it regularly (3 mnths) select monitor checked and it was fine. When examined (when stripped for upgrade) pistons were perfect.
Best power increase ever for £1.18p !!!!!!!!
Stan
Old 12 June 2003, 11:47 AM
  #17  
Gridlock Mikey
Scooby Regular
 
Gridlock Mikey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: http://www.facebook.com
Posts: 15,233
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question

sO DOES THIS DO THE SAME AS A dAWES EXCEPT WITH ecu CONTROL?

mIKEY (Sorry about the caps lock, can't be bothered to re-type

Old 12 June 2003, 12:24 PM
  #18  
ZIPPY
Scooby Regular
 
ZIPPY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,780
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Mikey, it isnt antwhere near what a Dawes will give you, it just allows the boost to build that bit smoother and earlier and increases the peak boost very slightly in the lower gears.The 3 cars i've fitted it too all said they could instantly tell the difference, me included.

Zippy
Old 12 June 2003, 12:52 PM
  #19  
spence7
Scooby Regular
 
spence7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

IT's not quite £1.18 though Stan is it surely ? Cos you wouldn't have gotten 280bhp odd without a remapped ECU as well. On the other hand I guess you wouldn't have seen 280bhp with a remapped ECU though if used without the restrictor ?

So using a bigger orifice only increases the rate of change of boost, not the peak ? Am I right ?

Old 12 June 2003, 02:09 PM
  #20  
Jay m A
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Jay m A's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Class record holder at Pembrey Llandow Goodwood MIRA Hethel Blyton Curborough Lydden and Snetterton
Posts: 8,626
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Forgive me if I'm wrong but max power is seen way after the boost spike so this mod should'nt affect top BHP. This mod should give more low down torque when boost comes in - which on the road is probably why a difference is reported

Erm, I think
Old 12 June 2003, 10:47 PM
  #21  
THOMO
Scooby Regular
 
THOMO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,081
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wink

if thats correct its amazing that remapping cost so much for less
gain.(safety would be my concern). nice one stan .have you had your car on a rolling road tune.
Old 13 June 2003, 08:10 PM
  #22  
StanS
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
StanS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Norfolk
Posts: 2,239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wink

Thomo - what do you mean "if that is correct" ? I am not in the habit of telling lies [img]images/smilies/mad.gif[/img]
If you need proof it was in the Jap Perf Mag July/Aug '01, page 68 on the Well Lane shootout article in Feb '01 !!
Author (obviously a knowledgable person ) said "21 psi is dodgy without STi internals" !!!!!
So what would he say now with people getting 470BHP on std internals !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Still, it was in a mag so what he said must be true !
Stan

[Edited by StanS - 6/13/2003 8:16:13 PM]
Old 17 June 2003, 12:00 PM
  #23  
flatfour0
Scooby Regular
 
flatfour0's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

If this mod is so good why don,t every one do it?
I fancy doing it but not sure if it will do any damage to my engine.
Old 17 June 2003, 06:58 PM
  #24  
StanS
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
StanS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Norfolk
Posts: 2,239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Good question - I was prepared for the worst happening, because of all the ignorant comments. I used SUL and octane booster, and had it regularly (3-monthly) checked on select monitor. And my engine/set up was fine. Can't say yours will be - but can't see why not if engine is checked like I did mine. PPP ecu had a lot to do with it I suspect - reducing the boost at "high" revs to about 1 bar.
Best £1.18 spent!
Stan
Old 17 June 2003, 10:24 PM
  #25  
ScoobyKev
Scooby Regular
 
ScoobyKev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 815
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

I had my P1 decatted last week and found that it was hitting fuel cut. Took the car down to Power Engineering and they imnstalled a restrictor, as it was peaking at 1.46 bar....they said it could bend a con rod. Now it boosts at 1 bar and still goes very well. At least I know it is running safe now

Regards

Kev
Old 18 June 2003, 04:31 PM
  #26  
st33ly
Scooby Regular
 
st33ly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: FiFe
Posts: 558
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Have tried this mod and have to say that spool up time is quicker and seems to pull harder. Have an MY01 WRX plus PPP. The mod did not even cost me anything as dad had a few small stainless steel Y pieces in his tool box. One question i do have though is will this cause my engine to blow up???

Regaeds craig
Old 19 June 2003, 12:48 AM
  #27  
Turbo_Steve
Scooby Regular
 
Turbo_Steve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,355
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

A PPP -IS- a remap, of course. That's the whole point.
Changing the restrictor is simply reducing the ECUs control over boost levels. If you have a boost gauge (and a knocklink) then I'd go right ahead.

It's a "pot luck" thing. Chances are you can change the restrictor and have a car that feels lots faster because the boost builds quicker and peaks a little, and you will have no problems.

But if you are not monitoring knock / AFR then I can only advise caution: This mod should (at least) be treated the same as fitting a dawes device and monitored carefully.
Only changing the restrictor has LESS control than a dawes: A dawes achieves a specific boost and stays there. Changing the restrictor simply reduces the ECUs control: fine under normal conditions...but what happens in a boost spike? On a really cold morning? When you fit that super-de-cat downpipe?


As for the PPP ECU, as some of the later ones have been associated with running lean, pushing the boost beyond it's normal limits on one of these is something I could not advise.

I am sure some of the more technical folks on here will have better arguments than me.

At the end of the day, your factory fuel cut is likely to protect you from most nasties, but I'd still want to monitor it with a knocklink / AFR.

Just a final thought: driveability. I've had a car that boosts massively before the ECU reins it back into standard. It feels great, but lacking in top-end, so you end up stirring gears more. And you pull out to overtake, shoot forwards.....and wonder where the acceleration went?
Old 19 June 2003, 09:27 PM
  #28  
StanS
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
StanS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Norfolk
Posts: 2,239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

I fitted a boost gauge at same time as restrictor, as driving blind with any "iffy" mod is only for those with bottomless wallets. Its how I knew when I got the peak boost I wanted as I drilled out the hole !
Great driveability, as peak boost came in at 3k - as opposed to 4.4k with current set up (although this gives much bigger grin!)
Stan
Old 20 June 2003, 05:15 PM
  #29  
flatfour0
Scooby Regular
 
flatfour0's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

How much is a boost guage? And were is the best place to get one?
Old 20 June 2003, 08:10 PM
  #30  
Turbo_Steve
Scooby Regular
 
Turbo_Steve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,355
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Unhappy

I strongly suspect you'll be changing it back when the temperatures drop. I had to Fuel cut is a horrible thing.


Quick Reply: Has anyone tried this extremely cheap Mod?



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:31 AM.