Notices
General Technical
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Air Charge temp test

Old Oct 31, 2015 | 06:01 PM
  #1  
boosted's Avatar
boosted
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,514
Likes: 1
From: harlow
Default Air Charge temp test

I have just fitted a temp probe after my newage WRX Intercooler, in the pipe that connects it to the inlet manifold.
I want to see if I need better intetcooling.
2.0 with big 16g running 353bhp and peak of 1.7 bar, anyone want to hazard a guess what temps I'll see? Not driven the car since fitting the gauge
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2015 | 07:36 PM
  #2  
hedgecutter's Avatar
hedgecutter
Scooby Regular
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 3,890
Likes: 708
From: far, far west
Default

If you are running that kind of power on a wrx intercooler successfully, I guess it is pointless for me to swap to a sti one when I put my billeted td04 and pinks on my wagon shortly ? I thought that anything above 300bhp really needed better intercooling ?
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2015 | 08:03 PM
  #3  
trevsjwood's Avatar
trevsjwood
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,660
Likes: 6
From: Northampton
Default

Originally Posted by boosted
I have just fitted a temp probe after my newage WRX Intercooler, in the pipe that connects it to the inlet manifold.
I want to see if I need better intetcooling.
2.0 with big 16g running 353bhp and peak of 1.7 bar, anyone want to hazard a guess what temps I'll see? Not driven the car since fitting the gauge
I would guess 20-30 c above outside air temp
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2015 | 08:43 PM
  #4  
banny sti's Avatar
banny sti
Scooby Senior
20 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (68)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 16,600
Likes: 24
From: Type R
Default

3 or 4 decent pulls, the gauge will go off the scale
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2015 | 09:01 PM
  #5  
boosted's Avatar
boosted
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,514
Likes: 1
From: harlow
Default

Originally Posted by banny sti
3 or 4 decent pulls, the gauge will go off the scale
This is my worry, think it reads to 70 odd degrees. Tomorrow/next week will be the test. I think with better intetcooling and a retune the car could make more power
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2015 | 09:03 PM
  #6  
boosted's Avatar
boosted
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,514
Likes: 1
From: harlow
Default

Originally Posted by trevsjwood
I would guess 20-30 c above outside air temp
So 30-40 degrees C, 30 is acceptable to me, above 40 is a worry
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2015 | 09:04 PM
  #7  
boosted's Avatar
boosted
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,514
Likes: 1
From: harlow
Default

Originally Posted by hedgecutter
If you are running that kind of power on a wrx intercooler successfully, I guess it is pointless for me to swap to a sti one when I put my billeted td04 and pinks on my wagon shortly ? I thought that anything above 300bhp really needed better intercooling ?
Better intetcooling will always yield more timing/power so it's always a benefit. But no, you don't need it at that power, nor do you need the pinks 👍
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Oct 31, 2015 | 09:47 PM
  #8  
stamina_daddy's Avatar
stamina_daddy
Scooby Regular
10 Year Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,100
Likes: 31
From: Uk
Default

Originally Posted by hedgecutter
If you are running that kind of power on a wrx intercooler successfully, I guess it is pointless for me to swap to a sti one when I put my billeted td04 and pinks on my wagon shortly ? I thought that anything above 300bhp really needed better intercooling ?
I'm running brand new billet 16g td04.Blue Hawk injectors and standard wrx wagon intercooler. I'm over 300 but not sure how much.
Rich at fb tuning said maybe 310,310.
Not bothered about rollers.
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2015 | 11:39 PM
  #9  
trevsjwood's Avatar
trevsjwood
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,660
Likes: 6
From: Northampton
Default

Originally Posted by boosted
So 30-40 degrees C, 30 is acceptable to me, above 40 is a worry
the STI topmount would do better, I've seen figures of high 20's.
also a turbo running at 1.7bar would create more heat than at 1.5 bar
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2015 | 08:36 AM
  #10  
boosted's Avatar
boosted
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,514
Likes: 1
From: harlow
Default

Originally Posted by trevsjwood
the STI topmount would do better, I've seen figures of high 20's.
also a turbo running at 1.7bar would create more heat than at 1.5 bar
For sure, more boost is more power though, if you can keep it cool. I'll not be going to STi top mount or front mount route, I would be using a charge cooler if I find my ACT's are high.
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2015 | 08:38 AM
  #11  
boosted's Avatar
boosted
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,514
Likes: 1
From: harlow
Default

14 mile drive to work today, ambient temp started off about 3 degrees, rising to about 6 degrees by the time I got to work. The only pulls i could do (running out of road/getting too much speed up etc) I managed to get the temps up to 14-18 degrees, so about 10 degrees above ambient. This is holding it at 1.7 bar for 10 seconds or so, bit of left foor braking too just to add load to the system.
More testing required for sure, but the OEM intercooler doesn't look bad?
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2015 | 09:37 AM
  #12  
alcazar's Avatar
alcazar
Scooby Regular
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 40,788
Likes: 30
From: Rl'yeh
Default

It's not day to day driving you need worry about. Mine was fine at 300bhp on an STi6 intercooler...........until I did a bit of "spirited" driving against a GT4 on a vfrench motorway, arrived at a toll booth, queued and drove away, to find that heatsoak had killed the engine.

I now have one of Harvey's FMIC's, my temperature probe shows about 6 deg above ambient, never more.
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2015 | 09:46 AM
  #13  
Rescue Dude's Avatar
Rescue Dude
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,760
Likes: 0
From: Herefordshire
Default

I have a new age intercooler fitted to my V3 STi and have a temp gauge fitted in the exit of the intercooler in the flow of air to the throttle body so a similar place to yours.

I find that in normal driving mostly off boost type stuff I run at about 6 degrees C above ambient. If I give it the beans it'll obviously run higher but with the bigger intercooler the temp comes down quite rapidly. A bigger intercooler is well worth it to get temps down quicker.
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2015 | 09:55 AM
  #14  
boosted's Avatar
boosted
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,514
Likes: 1
From: harlow
Default

Originally Posted by alcazar
It's not day to day driving you need worry about. Mine was fine at 300bhp on an STi6 intercooler...........until I did a bit of "spirited" driving against a GT4 on a vfrench motorway, arrived at a toll booth, queued and drove away, to find that heatsoak had killed the engine.

I now have one of Harvey's FMIC's, my temperature probe shows about 6 deg above ambient, never more.
But thats all I do, day to day driving. Im never in traffic (there isnt any here)
Heatsoak is an issue (on the drag-strip que perhaps), but cant this be fixed with fans? As an intercooler it seems to work well
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2015 | 10:02 AM
  #15  
bludgod's Avatar
bludgod
Scooby Regular
15 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,879
Likes: 24
From: Belfast
Default

perrin did some testing which could be of use here:
http://blog.perrinperformance.com/th...ercooler-test/

They saw around 60-65 degrees on their standard top mount test.

Out of curiosity, where did you get your sensor kit - any pics of it installed?
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2015 | 10:24 AM
  #16  
boosted's Avatar
boosted
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,514
Likes: 1
From: harlow
Default

Originally Posted by bludgod
perrin did some testing which could be of use here:
http://blog.perrinperformance.com/th...ercooler-test/

They saw around 60-65 degrees on their standard top mount test.

Out of curiosity, where did you get your sensor kit - any pics of it installed?
I will go have a look, my temp gauge is just an LCD battery operated thermometer, bought it off ebay a hundred years ago, quite accurate as it shows my body temp bang on the money.
Looks gansta, Its just poked tight in a hole through a temporary silicon connector after the intercooler.
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2015 | 10:27 AM
  #17  
Rescue Dude's Avatar
Rescue Dude
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,760
Likes: 0
From: Herefordshire
Default

Even when I thrash my car around in really hot temps I don't see a lot more than mid 40's at most. That's country lane type thrashing so up and down the box. On motorways/Dual carriageways it doesn't get anywhere near as hot as that.

If it's parked up after a bit of 'spirited driving' or stuck in very slow/stationary traffic I've see temps up to 60-65 but once the traffic moves the temps fly down.

Front mount will always be better and more consistent with temps as it's not sat on top of the engine.
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2015 | 10:48 AM
  #18  
boosted's Avatar
boosted
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,514
Likes: 1
From: harlow
Default

Originally Posted by Rescue Dude
Even when I thrash my car around in really hot temps I don't see a lot more than mid 40's at most. That's country lane type thrashing so up and down the box. On motorways/Dual carriageways it doesn't get anywhere near as hot as that.

If it's parked up after a bit of 'spirited driving' or stuck in very slow/stationary traffic I've see temps up to 60-65 but once the traffic moves the temps fly down.

Front mount will always be better and more consistent with temps as it's not sat on top of the engine.
After reading the Perrin test it seem flow is more of a consideration than just temperature alone. bigger intercoolers flow more, and subsequently drop less boost pressure higher up the rpm range.
I am considering a charge cooler to keep the boost pipe lengths short, increase flow and keep the temps cooler for longer.
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2015 | 10:52 AM
  #19  
Rescue Dude's Avatar
Rescue Dude
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,760
Likes: 0
From: Herefordshire
Default

Originally Posted by boosted
After reading the Perrin test it seem flow is more of a consideration than just temperature alone.
Absolutely!!

The temps I quoted are pretty extreme examples but once the car's moving, even fairly slowly the temps come down steadily. I also have intercooler spray which helps a lot after heat soak.
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2015 | 11:14 AM
  #20  
boosted's Avatar
boosted
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,514
Likes: 1
From: harlow
Default

Originally Posted by Rescue Dude
I also have intercooler spray which helps a lot after heat soak.
I too have the spray, another thing to test. im not convinced about it
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2015 | 02:45 PM
  #21  
Rescue Dude's Avatar
Rescue Dude
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,760
Likes: 0
From: Herefordshire
Default

Originally Posted by boosted
I too have the spray, another thing to test. im not convinced about it
I've found that using the spray cools the intercooler quicker than it does when I don't use it. Quite a lot quicker to be fair.
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2015 | 04:43 PM
  #22  
trevsjwood's Avatar
trevsjwood
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,660
Likes: 6
From: Northampton
Default

Originally Posted by boosted
I will go have a look, my temp gauge is just an LCD battery operated thermometer, bought it off ebay a hundred years ago, quite accurate as it shows my body temp bang on the money.
Looks gansta, Its just poked tight in a hole through a temporary silicon connector after the intercooler.
to be accurate the device needs to read at least twice a second as it could well miss the temperature spikes being produced by the turbo.
I monitor pre- intercooler temps and they can fluctuate between 70c up to 140c and back down in a split second depending on the pressure of my right foot. For measuring heat soak this wouldn't matter of course.
The figures you've posted seem good though and are confirmed by the power being achieved on a wrx topmount
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2015 | 05:01 PM
  #23  
boosted's Avatar
boosted
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,514
Likes: 1
From: harlow
Default

Originally Posted by trevsjwood
to be accurate the device needs to read at least twice a second as it could well miss the temperature spikes being produced by the turbo.
I monitor pre- intercooler temps and they can fluctuate between 70c up to 140c and back down in a split second depending on the pressure of my right foot. For measuring heat soak this wouldn't matter of course.
The figures you've posted seem good though and are confirmed by the power being achieved on a wrx topmount
Tbh my temp gauge refreshes every 8 seconds! Not brilliant as you say, but as long as your pull is 8 seconds you get a good idea of temp.
Did a pull in way home, 1-2-3, top end of 3rd was showing 42 degrees! 11 degree ambient. Came down pretty quick
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2015 | 05:05 PM
  #24  
Dazzles Fiesti's Avatar
Dazzles Fiesti
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 165
Likes: 3
From: Over the Pond, North side!
Default

Always interesting to read these type of threads.
I've been looking into this and the good old debate of 'TMIC versus FMIC' but I don't want to take this off subject but there was some good points in this thread https://www.scoobynet.com/954531-bhp...nd-fmic-4.html

It's interesting when you look at flow through the intercooler rather than just size!
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2015 | 10:40 PM
  #25  
Welloilbeefhooked's Avatar
Welloilbeefhooked
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,577
Likes: 0
From: Sheffield
Default

Boosted, interesting reading as Im about to fit my big 16g, sti7 tmic and 550cc injectors to my sti3. Before I do I was thinking the same about logging some charge temps. What guage did you purchase?
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2015 | 10:46 PM
  #26  
boosted's Avatar
boosted
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,514
Likes: 1
From: harlow
Default

Originally Posted by Dazzles Fiesti
Always interesting to read these type of threads.
I've been looking into this and the good old debate of 'TMIC versus FMIC' but I don't want to take this off subject but there was some good points in this thread https://www.scoobynet.com/954531-bhp...nd-fmic-4.html

It's interesting when you look at flow through the intercooler rather than just size!
To quote trevsjwood; (I agree entirely that the heat comes from the compressor and that it is here you should look first)
I just wonder how many people have installed a fmic when they didn't really need to.
I was stuck on a below expectation 380hp and the advice from two top mappers was to go front mount.
What actually was happening was the oem dv was bleeding boost, causing the turbo to overwork, creating excessive heat, 180c+ pre intercooler. The short of it is, the dv was replaced,temps now 137c pre-intercooler at 1.6bar, the car went on to produce 421hp on straight Vpower, (at 380hp it was on Vpower/10%meth with no further progress possible). On 20%meth it produced 441hp/480lbsft, all this on a 400hp turbo, the MD321H. The tmic is an AVO which is a good bar and plate type and slightly smaller than the V8 STI TMIC.
Ok, I run a water/meth injection system which helps bring the ACT's down to 5/6 degrees of ambient and EGT'S of 600C at full boost. Previously the W/M system was only helping to mask the problem of the overworked turbo by keeping ACT's in some sort of check.
My next step is to fit a BILLET T which I'm hoping will give me another 30hp and a stronger top end which the H does lack on my set-up.
My point is more work should be done on whats coming out of the compressor wheel end of the turbo because in my experience it can vary enormously and any intercooler be it top or front would be challenged by temps of 180c+ and a lot better off with something around 130c.
Trev
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2015 | 01:45 PM
  #27  
ScottyPPP's Avatar
ScottyPPP
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,497
Likes: 3
From: Hampshire
Default

Just sold a spare STi top mount I had. It came with the IC to TB hose though so I've kept that as I was going to rig something up for mine to monitor the temp also.

Don't forget you're doing this in November also, in July your 42 degrees would be a **** load more!
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2015 | 02:18 PM
  #28  
boosted's Avatar
boosted
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,514
Likes: 1
From: harlow
Default

Originally Posted by ScottyPPP
Just sold a spare STi top mount I had. It came with the IC to TB hose though so I've kept that as I was going to rig something up for mine to monitor the temp also.

Don't forget you're doing this in November also, in July your 42 degrees would be a **** load more!
yeah the temps are 32 degrees above ambient, so your speaking 55 degrees act when the car was mapped in the summer! ouft.
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2015 | 02:26 PM
  #29  
boosted's Avatar
boosted
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,514
Likes: 1
From: harlow
Default

I plan on fitting a chargecooler similar to the ones I have used with success before. One on a 2.0 16V peaking 2.0 bar boost and holding 1.8. Another on a 2.8 24v peaking and holding 1.5 bar boost.
Name:  A56330C9-BFAE-4078-9822-0D8F5F02766D-6524-000008EC6E3ECCFE_zpsb1045788.jpg
Views: 0
Size:  186.2 KB
Name:  91932338-4FD4-46DC-BD53-8FC2D772A8F7-41438-000045AEE494813F.jpg
Views: 0
Size:  334.9 KB
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2015 | 02:28 PM
  #30  
ScottyPPP's Avatar
ScottyPPP
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,497
Likes: 3
From: Hampshire
Default

Few guys in the states have done that. Fitted in the top mount location with the heat exchanger up front in the normal FMIC place.
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:57 AM.