Notices
Engine Management and ECU Remapping This section is to discuss the various aspects of engine management modification for your Subaru.

More Power.....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02 January 2015, 10:50 AM
  #1  
Norman Jacks
Scooby Newbie
Thread Starter
 
Norman Jacks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default More Power.....

I have a 2004 WRX which I bought standard a few months ago and was looking to get more power out of it.

I have already put a straight through exhaust system on so what next?
A bigger turbo then a map?

Some have said to put a cone air filter on but some have said not to....?

I have had a lot of people say a lot of different things and would appreciate more opinions.

Thank you
N
Old 02 January 2015, 12:11 PM
  #2  
jaygsi
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (46)
 
jaygsi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: uk
Posts: 14,530
Received 256 Likes on 222 Posts
Default

We had someone ask this the other day, what kind of power you after?

If you get panel filter, full system i'd go sports cat not decat, and larger intercooler even front mounted for STI and remap should see you 260-300bhp seen loads of different figures achieved with those mods
Old 02 January 2015, 12:19 PM
  #3  
Reef
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Reef's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Horsham, Sussex
Posts: 784
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I did my WRX last year.

Fuel Pump
De-Cat
K&N Filter
PF7 Plugs
Re-Map

I've now got 279bhp, Its transformed the car...
Old 02 January 2015, 12:32 PM
  #4  
jaygsi
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (46)
 
jaygsi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: uk
Posts: 14,530
Received 256 Likes on 222 Posts
Default

Completely pointless bud you need a panel filter, cone filter will not improve power at all, may even reduce power in the hight of summer when the engine is sucking all that hot air from under your bonnet

Watch video below better explained


Originally Posted by Norman Jacks
Some have said to put a cone air filter on but some have said not to....?
Old 02 January 2015, 01:08 PM
  #5  
Norman Jacks
Scooby Newbie
Thread Starter
 
Norman Jacks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'm looking at around 270 / 300.

Yes I heard that about the cone filters...

Thanks for your help
Old 02 January 2015, 01:11 PM
  #6  
Reef
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Reef's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Horsham, Sussex
Posts: 784
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I've been told I need a TD04 Hybrid or VF35 and pink injectors to see 300 on top if what I've already done listed above.
Old 02 January 2015, 01:22 PM
  #7  
Norman Jacks
Scooby Newbie
Thread Starter
 
Norman Jacks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Mines TD05 or VF34.

are injectors a must have if you upgrade the turbo?
Old 02 January 2015, 01:36 PM
  #8  
Reef
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Reef's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Horsham, Sussex
Posts: 784
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'm pretty sure a TD04 is the standard turbo on a Blob WRX. It sounds like you're car has been modified before you got it.

I would be tempted to get it to a mapper and get them to check whats already been done and what bhp you've got now. You may already have bigger injectors, etc...
Old 02 January 2015, 01:42 PM
  #9  
Norman Jacks
Scooby Newbie
Thread Starter
 
Norman Jacks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

No sorry I meant to upgrade i need a TD05 or a VF34
Mine has a TD04 currently as it is standard.

It was 100% completely standard when i bought it, I triple checked as I spent a long time looking for a blank canvas.
Old 02 January 2015, 02:14 PM
  #10  
Reef
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Reef's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Horsham, Sussex
Posts: 784
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Ahh, sorry my mistake

With a bigger turbo you are increasing the amount of air so you'll need more fuel. Bigger injectors and fuel pump is a must to get the best out of the turbo.

I'm replacing the suspension now before I go any further with power...
Old 02 January 2015, 02:54 PM
  #11  
RS_Matt
Scooby Regular
 
RS_Matt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Wakefield
Posts: 5,303
Received 18 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Norman Jacks
Mines TD05 or VF34.

are injectors a must have if you upgrade the turbo?
Yes. Gives you more headroom when upping boost and they'll protect you if you get overboost on a cold day. Lots of WRX/STI owners experience it at some stage. Vac pipes splitting, EBC or actuator issues etc.

If you plan on sustained hard driving then it's probably worth getting a turbo blanket and wrapping the up-pipe/downpipe whilst fitting. A lot of WRX's that fail have failed on #3 cylinder as it's the closest cylinder to the heat of the exhaust/turbo.
Old 02 January 2015, 03:13 PM
  #12  
Norman Jacks
Scooby Newbie
Thread Starter
 
Norman Jacks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Ahh okay this is making more sense to me now.

So what would you suggest before my first map ... a panel filter and a bigger top mount?
Old 02 January 2015, 03:16 PM
  #13  
Reef
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Reef's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Horsham, Sussex
Posts: 784
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I've been told the WRX top mount is good for 300.

I'd go filter, fuel pump and plugs.
Old 02 January 2015, 03:55 PM
  #14  
jaygsi
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (46)
 
jaygsi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: uk
Posts: 14,530
Received 256 Likes on 222 Posts
Default

Agreed, although STI intercooler would help

Originally Posted by Reef
I've been told the WRX top mount is good for 300.

I'd go filter, fuel pump and plugs.
Old 02 January 2015, 04:30 PM
  #15  
RS_Matt
Scooby Regular
 
RS_Matt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Wakefield
Posts: 5,303
Received 18 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Norman Jacks
Ahh okay this is making more sense to me now.

So what would you suggest before my first map ... a panel filter and a bigger top mount?
As much as you can afford!

TD05, VF34/35, SC36 turbo
STI pinks
Walbro fuel pump
STI top mount
Panel filter
NKG PFR7
Snorkelectomy
Wrapped Decat up-pipe
Sports cat/de-cat downpipe
De-cat centre section
Backbox
Silicone turbo inlet hose
Silicone intercooler hose
Turbo blanket

Fuel pressure regulator, oil Cooler, 3 port boost controller, FMIC, Syvecs ECU or even a SC42 if you have money to burn! I think you might just get away with 400/340 on a WRX with good heat management.
Old 02 January 2015, 04:37 PM
  #16  
Norman Jacks
Scooby Newbie
Thread Starter
 
Norman Jacks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Great!
So it is best to do it all in one go?
I was under the impression you do it in stages

Thanks for the advice
Old 02 January 2015, 05:10 PM
  #17  
Dave Y
Scooby Regular
Support Scoobynet!
iTrader: (52)
 
Dave Y's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Forest of Dean
Posts: 5,167
Received 133 Likes on 97 Posts
Default

get as many mods together as possible then its one mapping session.
If you keep adding bits you will then need the map tweak each time.
Old 02 January 2015, 05:33 PM
  #18  
Reef
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Reef's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Horsham, Sussex
Posts: 784
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RS_Matt
As much as you can afford!

TD05, VF34/35, SC36 turbo
STI pinks
Walbro fuel pump
STI top mount
Panel filter
NKG PFR7
Snorkelectomy
Wrapped Decat up-pipe
Sports cat/de-cat downpipe
De-cat centre section
Backbox
Silicone turbo inlet hose
Silicone intercooler hose
Turbo blanket

Fuel pressure regulator, oil Cooler, 3 port boost controller, FMIC, Syvecs ECU or even a SC42 if you have money to burn! I think you might just get away with 400/340 on a WRX with good heat management.
Top post!

I notice you don't recommend a Hybrid TD04, any reason why not?

Also, what the hell is a Snorkelectomy?
Old 02 January 2015, 05:38 PM
  #19  
fat-thomas
BANNED
iTrader: (4)
 
fat-thomas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: fawor's car wash
Posts: 4,258
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Reef
Top post!

I notice you don't recommend a Hybrid TD04, any reason why not?

Also, what the hell is a Snorkelectomy?
I'd disagree ,advising someone to run 400 bhp through a wrx internals is going to lead to a big bill.
Old 02 January 2015, 05:44 PM
  #20  
Reef
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Reef's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Horsham, Sussex
Posts: 784
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by fat-thomas
I'd disagree ,advising someone to run 400 bhp through a wrx internals is going to lead to a big bill.
Ahh yes I don't agree with that bit just the mod list. On my own WRX I would go above 330/330 without engine work.

Not sure the gearbox would last long on 400
Old 02 January 2015, 06:21 PM
  #21  
gazney101
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
gazney101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: co durham
Posts: 1,114
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by fat-thomas

I'd disagree ,advising someone to run 400 bhp through a wrx internals is going to lead to a big bill.
Youre probably right there but not in all cases, i would say it depends on the owner and how its mapped, everything has a life span and i think if treat right, a 400hp wrx engine could live a considerable lifespan.

Probably wouldnt be much fun though, especially when the glassbox shatters every 50ft
Old 02 January 2015, 09:07 PM
  #22  
RS_Matt
Scooby Regular
 
RS_Matt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Wakefield
Posts: 5,303
Received 18 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Reef
Ahh yes I don't agree with that bit just the mod list. On my own WRX I would go above 330/330 without engine work.

Not sure the gearbox would last long on 400
Don't listen to fat-thomas, he's full of ****.

Torque kills the box so 400/330 or 330/330 poses the same moderate threat. Torque also kills the weak rods so my guessing is that the rings and pistons will be ok anywhere under 400bhp if you can keep temps low.

Low boost, oil cooler, richer fuel map, thicker oil and bigger intercooler all helps. Exhaust/turbo wrapping and not driving hard for sustained periods will help too.

As for the TD04 Hybrid I've seen a lot of dyno figures to suggest it's not worth it for power gains alone and some tuners have reported mapping issues from the incredibly fast spool. Obviously get it if you want to hover around 300bhp, it's perhaps the best turbo for those levels.
Old 02 January 2015, 09:08 PM
  #23  
JusNoGood
Scooby Regular
 
JusNoGood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Surrey
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I bought a standard 2004 blob.

I installed a Pipercross airfilter, Walbro fuel pump and a WR Sport back box (second hand from eBay).

Duncan remapped it in December and it made 272bhp. He thought it would make 290 by removing the cat in the down pipe (I think he said)

For me the best effect of the remap is the smoothness of the delivery of power.

oh yea, I'm getting about 50-60 less miles to a tank.

Last edited by JusNoGood; 02 January 2015 at 09:12 PM.
Old 02 January 2015, 09:25 PM
  #24  
RS_Matt
Scooby Regular
 
RS_Matt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Wakefield
Posts: 5,303
Received 18 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

I've put my 400bhp WRX theory to a lot of the top tuners on the planet (Inc Mike Adkins) and so far none have got back to me.
Old 02 January 2015, 09:58 PM
  #25  
jaygsi
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (46)
 
jaygsi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: uk
Posts: 14,530
Received 256 Likes on 222 Posts
Default

All this info helps as i've been thinking about going down this path aswell. Standard bhp is poor by todays standards. Id be happy with 280-300.
Old 02 January 2015, 10:56 PM
  #26  
MattyB1983
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (51)
 
MattyB1983's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Around
Posts: 12,716
Likes: 0
Received 46 Likes on 30 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by fat-thomas
I'd disagree ,advising someone to run 400 bhp through a wrx internals is going to lead to a big bill.
Let them get on with it, this forum is full of bad advice lately.
Old 03 January 2015, 12:14 AM
  #27  
bigdal
Scooby Regular
 
bigdal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: London
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

http://www.andyforrestperformance.co.uk/26911.html

Last edited by bigdal; 03 January 2015 at 02:02 AM.
Old 03 January 2015, 08:08 AM
  #28  
Reef
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Reef's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Horsham, Sussex
Posts: 784
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Sorry for taking over this thread Norman but this is really interesting. Thanks for all the responses guys

TD05, VF34/35, SC36 turbo
STI pinks
Walbro fuel pump FITTED
STI top mount (should you get undertray and scoop as well?)
Panel filter FITTED
NKG PFR7 FITTED
Snorkelectomy ???
Wrapped Decat up-pipe FITTED
Sports cat/de-cat downpipe FITTED
De-cat centre section FITTED (with resonator)
Backbox FITTED (Prodrive one)
Silicone turbo inlet hose
Silicone intercooler hose FITTED
Turbo blanket

Currently running 279/301 on a Ecutek map
I'm pretty happy with the car for road use only thing I don't like is how the power drops off high in the rev range.

What should I go for in the above to cure this and see 300/300?

Thanks for the Andy Forrest link as well I've seen this before it's very informative.

Last edited by Reef; 03 January 2015 at 08:32 AM.
Old 03 January 2015, 08:22 AM
  #29  
fat-thomas
BANNED
iTrader: (4)
 
fat-thomas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: fawor's car wash
Posts: 4,258
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RS_Matt
Don't listen to fat-thomas, he's full of ****.

Torque kills the box so 400/330 or 330/330 poses the same moderate threat. Torque also kills the weak rods so my guessing is that the rings and pistons will be ok anywhere under 400bhp if you can keep temps low.

Low boost, oil cooler, richer fuel map, thicker oil and bigger intercooler all helps. Exhaust/turbo wrapping and not driving hard for sustained periods will help too.

As for the TD04 Hybrid I've seen a lot of dyno figures to suggest it's not worth it for power gains alone and some tuners have reported mapping issues from the incredibly fast spool. Obviously get it if you want to hover around 300bhp, it's perhaps the best turbo for those levels.
OK for a change I'll ask for a serious answers,firstly by trying to run low torque all you are doing is trying to make up for the weak wrx components, namely the bottom end and gearbox.
So how exactly do you map for high bhp and low torque as they go hand in hand upwards on tuned engines.
Say what you want but advising someone to run 400 bhp through wrx components which are commonly known to only be able to handle 350 bhp is very poor advice and furthermore unfounded as you haven't done it.
the red highlighted part tells you all you need to know about the post

Last edited by fat-thomas; 03 January 2015 at 08:30 AM.
Old 03 January 2015, 08:24 AM
  #30  
fat-thomas
BANNED
iTrader: (4)
 
fat-thomas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: fawor's car wash
Posts: 4,258
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MattyB1983
Let them get on with it, this forum is full of bad advice lately.
I know ,I know ☺


Quick Reply: More Power.....



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:16 AM.