Notices
Drivetrain Gearbox, Diffs & Driveshafts etc

difference between VF 23 and VF 29

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 18 April 2002, 01:35 PM
  #1  
kurt
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
kurt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Can any one tell my the difference between VF 23 and VF 29 in performance when upgrading to these from standard WRX turbo

kurt
Old 18 April 2002, 02:29 PM
  #2  
john banks
Scooby Regular
 
john banks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: 32 cylinders and many cats
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Post

IIRC, VF 29 is a little bit "smaller", so lower boost threshold, less at the top end from my simplistic understanding. http://www.mrtrally.com.au/performan...turbo-data.pdf but the link doesn't work for me at present - I think it had VF29 in there.
Old 18 April 2002, 02:29 PM
  #3  
Adam M
Scooby Regular
 
Adam M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 7,957
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

the answer is about 6!
Old 18 April 2002, 02:50 PM
  #4  
SecretAgentMan
Scooby Regular
 
SecretAgentMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,912
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

I've dabbled a bit with a VF23, a hybrid-ed VF23, and my own VF24 (roughly the same as the 28/29 IIRC)...and it all depends on what you're asking from it...

The difference in spool up is negligable between my 24 (fmic'ed) and the 23...the TD hybrid is on par with the 24.

At 1.2 there's really not too much in it....but IMHO the difference in flow up high will become larger with upped boost...

So...for my car I've chosen to stay with the 24, and added an FMIC....and I'm not going to run more than 1.3 bar (for now), until I can afford proper internals (and a gearbox).

My car with the 24 at 1.3 is a completely different thing to a VF23 @ 1.2 with a TMIC.

IMHO of course.

Adam, I know what you're going to say - so FO mate.

/J
Old 18 April 2002, 03:16 PM
  #5  
R19KET
Scooby Regular
 
R19KET's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: SSO2003 2nd, SSO2005 1st, SSO2006 2nd, TACC Rd4 5th 4wd: In my car ;-)
Posts: 2,637
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Jerry,

"The difference in spool up is negligable between my 24 (fmic'ed) and the 23...the TD hybrid is on par with the 24."

So are you saying they spool up about the same then ?

"My car with the 24 at 1.3 is a completely different thing to a VF23 @ 1.2 with a TMIC."

You don't say !!! So does this mean that my car running my turbo, with a completely different setup to you, would be different again ?

Mate........what the hell are you today !!!!!

Mark.

Old 18 April 2002, 03:40 PM
  #6  
SecretAgentMan
Scooby Regular
 
SecretAgentMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,912
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wink

LMAO - Mark...my excuse is being non-limey by birth, and still lacking somewhat in the limey langwitch ...what's yours?

I was a wee bit disturbed by the bigboss when I was writing that bit regarding the spool up...the regular 23 is a tad later on the spool up...say ~2-300 rpm, the hybrid I tried was on par with the 24.

What I was trying to say is....don't get a bigger turbo than your needs demand, hybrids are v v v nice....but pricey, I went the fmic way instead of swapping the 24 for a hybrid 23.



/J
Old 18 April 2002, 03:55 PM
  #7  
R19KET
Scooby Regular
 
R19KET's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: SSO2003 2nd, SSO2005 1st, SSO2006 2nd, TACC Rd4 5th 4wd: In my car ;-)
Posts: 2,637
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Jerry,

I agree about turbo sizing. The problem is that most people have turbo's that are too small, for what they want, and over drive them. In most of these cases, they would be better off reducing the boost, and advancing the ignition.

Mark.
Old 18 April 2002, 05:21 PM
  #8  
BugEyed
Scooby Regular
 
BugEyed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,029
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Mark

It is always tempting to fit a small turbo and get the most from it - you get the benefit of a lower spool up speed and you never know what you lost at the top end. You are correct however in warning against the churning effect and getting the desired boost but with high inlet temps.

Duncan

PS According to MRT the VF29 has a smaller turbine housing than a VF23, so will benefit from a lower spool up speed. It should make reasonable power (it was after all fitted to the STi6 in Japan at 280 BHP), but without knowing your power target and other criterea it is impossible to say which is better.
Old 18 April 2002, 06:37 PM
  #9  
kurt
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
kurt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

I'm looking for about 300 bhp so the VF 29 will do the job I think if that is what I can make of reading your comments and on a later date, I can change it to a hybrid version

kurt
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
scoobhunter722
ScoobyNet General
52
20 October 2015 04:32 PM
KK3960
General Technical
3
07 October 2015 12:33 PM
bluebullet29
General Technical
9
05 October 2015 02:17 PM
blackieblob
ScoobyNet General
4
01 October 2015 11:37 AM
jonnyricer2
Wanted
2
30 September 2015 06:52 PM



Quick Reply: difference between VF 23 and VF 29



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:04 AM.