PPP ECU
22 February 2002, 07:11 PM
#2
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: 32 cylinders and many cats
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
215 BHP and 215 lbft to 237 (240) BHP and 258 (261) lbft - MY01 in brackets. There is about 20% more torque in the midrange. On the MY01 you are not getting a full ECU but a sophisticated voltage clamp - I wouldn't buy it personally, but I did buy MY00 PPP.
22 February 2002, 07:17 PM
#4
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: 32 cylinders and many cats
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Don't know. But since you don't need to keep a warranty I would choose other methods. I don't think any of the earlier ones surpassed the gains on the later model - if anything one magazine tested a PPP and found it slower. The MY99/00 was much better.
Have you thought about a manual boost controller? Should be as effective and about 80 times cheaper. http://www.dawesdevices.com
Have you thought about a manual boost controller? Should be as effective and about 80 times cheaper. http://www.dawesdevices.com
22 February 2002, 07:24 PM
#6
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: 32 cylinders and many cats
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Fuelling is MAF based. If the MAF signal is not saturated, the injectors are not at a stupid duty cycle, you are at a sensible point on the compressor map, intake temps, exhaust gas temps and air fuel ratio are fine and there is no knock then I reckon you are fine. In practice this seems to be the case up to fuel cut on a MY99/00 UK spec. Possibly not the case on imports or some other models, but many are using them and the safety data seems OK.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
28
28 December 2015 11:07 PM
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
12
18 November 2015 07:03 AM