Who needs a 2.5 when a 2.0 goes like this ?
#1
Subaru Tuning Specialist
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: 7.74 @179 mph 1/4 mile - road legal
Posts: 6,654
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Two recent AP22 power runs from Harveys rapid Sti6.
The runs were in different directions hence the difference in power recorded.
This was a gentle start 1st and 2nd then a 3rd gear full power 'roll on' from low speed and into 4th gear.
The gearing on this car has been changed and hence is not typical Sti.
Average of 388 bhp at the wheels equates to approx 477 flywheel horsepower........not bad for a daily driver
The runs were in different directions hence the difference in power recorded.
This was a gentle start 1st and 2nd then a 3rd gear full power 'roll on' from low speed and into 4th gear.
The gearing on this car has been changed and hence is not typical Sti.
Average of 388 bhp at the wheels equates to approx 477 flywheel horsepower........not bad for a daily driver
#4
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: RIP Moneys Scoob 440bhp/470lbsft 31-07-08
Posts: 6,005
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
He drives this round daily!!! Top man. Very nice
I take it he has spent a fortune on it?! He should make an article or word document what he has done. Will be interesting to read
I take it he has spent a fortune on it?! He should make an article or word document what he has done. Will be interesting to read
#5
Subaru Tuning Specialist
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: 7.74 @179 mph 1/4 mile - road legal
Posts: 6,654
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
IIRC he has done over 20,000 miles on this Roger Clark Motorsport built engine which has an iON Performance turbo
The full spec is on the TyneTees Subaru web site, don't have a link I'm afraid.
The full spec is on the TyneTees Subaru web site, don't have a link I'm afraid.
#7
Trending Topics
#15
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (48)
Hi Andy: Just seen this. Thanks for posting.
Paul: I now have a closed deck block so I can start again and incorporate further developments. Looks like I will buck the trend (again) and stay with 2 litres (2016cc) as I am sure there is lots more potential from the EJ20 and it will be possible to build a high reving engine. Bearing in mind that up to last October 360/380bhp was around the ceiling for most high power Scoobies things have come on a long way pretty quickly.
It will be very interesting to see the results from bigger capacity engines and how they perform on the road/track. Should be a few around soon as they have been in the melting pot for some time.
Paul: I now have a closed deck block so I can start again and incorporate further developments. Looks like I will buck the trend (again) and stay with 2 litres (2016cc) as I am sure there is lots more potential from the EJ20 and it will be possible to build a high reving engine. Bearing in mind that up to last October 360/380bhp was around the ceiling for most high power Scoobies things have come on a long way pretty quickly.
It will be very interesting to see the results from bigger capacity engines and how they perform on the road/track. Should be a few around soon as they have been in the melting pot for some time.
#16
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Southampton, 12.7 1/4 mile purple Scooby
Posts: 839
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Harvey I can't wait to see this on the rollers at the G Force meet in a couple of weeks time
Colin.
[Edited by colin c - 3/24/2003 7:55:38 PM]
Colin.
[Edited by colin c - 3/24/2003 7:55:38 PM]
#19
Shouldn't the power between gears be zero if the roll resistance and CdA values are correct? It seems to me that the power is about 75bhp off at 100mph. Or am i completely missing something here?
#20
Pete,
yeah, you are right, the power figures should be negative between the gears, since the car will be decellerating, so something is a litte amiss with the figures....
Cheers,
Pat.
yeah, you are right, the power figures should be negative between the gears, since the car will be decellerating, so something is a litte amiss with the figures....
Cheers,
Pat.
#21
negative power due to decelleration?
maybe due to no drive, but just because it's decellerating that doesn't mean there's no power, just less power than that required to overcome the drag.
I think it's a lack of response from the AP22 more than anything.
Paul
maybe due to no drive, but just because it's decellerating that doesn't mean there's no power, just less power than that required to overcome the drag.
I think it's a lack of response from the AP22 more than anything.
Paul
#23
Subaru Tuning Specialist
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: 7.74 @179 mph 1/4 mile - road legal
Posts: 6,654
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
The 'base line' trace on the AP22 is the calculated power (from Cd, frontal area and rolling drag) to maintain that velocity. You will see it does not increase linearly with mph. Ie just to hold that mph steady requires bhp, in this case, between gears, momentum is effectivly providing the power to move the car.
Andy
Christian - Can you make me up one of them but change the scale to 800
Andy
Christian - Can you make me up one of them but change the scale to 800