Notices
Drivetrain Gearbox, Diffs & Driveshafts etc

2.0 litre rebuilds - reliability experiences please

Old Jan 14, 2003 | 09:21 PM
  #1  
john banks's Avatar
john banks
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 1
From: 32 cylinders and many cats
Post

Interested in actual experiences of those who have daily driven 2 litre rebuilt engines running over 350 BHP confirmed on rollers or sensibly estimated.

How many miles and what sort of use at each power level?

Care to share any issues you have had?

Reason for asking is that there are many recommendations based on specification or theory and I have come across little based on experience of running x power for y miles.

Some may not wish to share this info, if you mail me offline I would be grateful. As it is I keep nothing about my own car secret and happily share any developments. Others feel differently I understand, so realise this will by no means be a complete archive.

My use for the information is simply to choose the correct spec to go faster for longer and enjoy my car more having engineered it appropriate to the power I wish.

For my part I have now been running at (estimates) 300 BHP on a standard UK engine 2000 miles, then 320 BHP for 3000 miles and then 350 BHP for 6000 miles with no issues at all with regards to the health of the engine or drivetrain. The car is used as a daily driver and gets looked after in terms of warm up/cool down, but I do use all the power available whenever appropriate to do so. I am looking for similar info on rebuilt engines (but with substantially higher power figures).
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2003 | 09:53 PM
  #2  
CraigH's Avatar
CraigH
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,675
Likes: 0
Post

John,

Ran between 360 and 400hp in mine. Components used I can tell you and what else was changed. It appears engine wouldn't have lasted long (10k) but that was more down to build than anything.

Can't see any real reliability issues on a decent build.


[Edited by CraigH - 1/14/2003 9:56:38 PM]
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2003 | 10:58 PM
  #3  
Bob Rawle's Avatar
Bob Rawle
Sponsor
 
Joined: Mar 1999
Posts: 3,938
Likes: 1
From: Swindon
Post

My engine spec you know, just under 11,000 miles all together. Daily drive as yours.

Bob
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2003 | 11:03 PM
  #4  
ustolemyname??stevieturbo's Avatar
ustolemyname??stevieturbo
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,786
Likes: 0
From: Norn Iron
Post

Id say that it would be hard to claim reliability from that??? How much of the milage was actually producing the 350+bhp... probably very few as most of the miles was normal driving.
You could be very unlucky, and within a few miles, break a rod or similar, or you may be lucky, and last for 20,000 miles of hard driving, and nothing happen.
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2003 | 11:57 PM
  #5  
harvey's Avatar
harvey
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (48)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 10,419
Likes: 1
From: Darlington
Post

Engine was rebuilt by Matt Clark (Roger Clark Motorsport) at 14,487mls. This was 10mls after I fitted an APS cold air kit and removed the bumble bee mesh in front of the MAF sensor. No2 piston picked up the bore in only 10mls. Rebuild included forged pistons,steel rods and oil pump modification.Power was 320bhp April 02.Power increased with a few mods in stages to 377 bhp at22,640mls August 02. In October with 26,375mls the Ion Performance turbo was fitted, giving 417 bhp. Now circa 31,000 mls and no issues whatsoever with the engine. Did have a problem of my own making with the turbo but that has been resolved.
With the Cosworth pistons the car is using 4litres oil in 3000mls and if I was to do this exercise again I would go for alternative pistons designed by Matt Clark which I believe will show a number of performance gains over the existing.
The engine is treated carefully when cold but not molly coddled in any other way.
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2003 | 09:01 AM
  #6  
David_Wallis's Avatar
David_Wallis
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 15,239
Likes: 1
From: Leeds - It was 562.4bhp@28psi on Optimax, How much closer to 600 with race fuel and a bigger turbo?
Post

Harvey is your block closed deck?

Why about the pistons?? do they run a bigger clearance than some??

David
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2003 | 09:54 AM
  #7  
harvey's Avatar
harvey
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (48)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 10,419
Likes: 1
From: Darlington
Post

Open deck and no problems.
Piston clearance is 2.5 thou but some of the later engines with less clearance still had a similar oil consumption but I expect that has been cured with the new family of pistons which Matt Clark has developed. They also have a better skirt and I think are lighter.
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Jan 15, 2003 | 10:22 AM
  #8  
David_Wallis's Avatar
David_Wallis
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 15,239
Likes: 1
From: Leeds - It was 562.4bhp@28psi on Optimax, How much closer to 600 with race fuel and a bigger turbo?
Post

interesting
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2003 | 10:45 AM
  #9  
steve McCulloch's Avatar
steve McCulloch
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 1999
Posts: 2,271
Likes: 0
Post

Jeez thats a lot of oil consumption

Perhaps I should be looking at this.. but then I guess I have different uprated pistons

Willbe able to comment on mine in the next 6 months on a basic 2 liter rebuild... no issues with the original engine - just fancied more power

As long as I dont write off. May get rid of it just after summer..

[Edited by steve McCulloch - 1/15/2003 12:20:44 PM]
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2003 | 12:28 PM
  #10  
AlexM's Avatar
AlexM
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Apr 1999
Posts: 1,035
Likes: 0
Post

Isn't oil consuption more related to how well the oil control rings are sealing than the piston to bore clearance?.

Reply
Old Jan 15, 2003 | 12:33 PM
  #11  
Katana's Avatar
Katana
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,153
Likes: 0
From: In a house
Post

interesting
Haven't the misus banned you from the workshop yet?
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2003 | 12:38 PM
  #12  
R19KET's Avatar
R19KET
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 2,637
Likes: 0
From: SSO2003 2nd, SSO2005 1st, SSO2006 2nd, TACC Rd4 5th 4wd: In my car ;-)
Post

Poor oil consumption can be caused by several things. I wasn't aware that piston design was one of them, well at least not the Cosworth piston.

Worn oil stem seals, and valve guides, bore/hone finish, poor exhaust valve seating.

Mark.

Reply
Old Jan 15, 2003 | 01:19 PM
  #13  
Floyd's Avatar
Floyd
Scooby Regular
25 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 5,471
Likes: 10
Question

John

"I do use all the power available whenever appropriate to do so"

I thought you'd started to limit the power in lower gears for fear of reliability or are you 'anything goes' now?

F
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2003 | 01:32 PM
  #14  
john banks's Avatar
john banks
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 1
From: 32 cylinders and many cats
Post

Tend not to go mad in first gear that is all.
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2003 | 01:53 PM
  #15  
SecretAgentMan's Avatar
SecretAgentMan
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,912
Likes: 0
Post

LOL

Forget 1st gear JB - I shot 3rd gear.



/J
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2003 | 01:56 PM
  #16  
easyrider's Avatar
easyrider
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 950
Likes: 1
Question

John

What mods were you using to get 300bhp on your "std" engine-im interested as this is the power i would like to have in mine.

Reply
Old Jan 15, 2003 | 02:31 PM
  #17  
David_Wallis's Avatar
David_Wallis
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 15,239
Likes: 1
From: Leeds - It was 562.4bhp@28psi on Optimax, How much closer to 600 with race fuel and a bigger turbo?
Post

katana.. thats why I make an effort to stay single

Then I can spend as I like...

Its interesting as it must be the highest powered open deck block subaru.. I thought mine was doing well at 345

David
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2003 | 02:31 PM
  #18  
john banks's Avatar
john banks
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 1
From: 32 cylinders and many cats
Post

Ported OEM exhaust manifold, Hybrid TD04 turbo, full exhaust system, remap, 1.4 bar dropping to about 1.15 bar at peak power, upgraded fuel pump, upgraded TMIC.

This is not what I would now recommend for 300 BHP.

Would now suggest: ported OEM manifold, bigger turbo, full exhaust system, 1.2 bar midrange maybe drop to about 1.1 bar top end and upgraded fuel pump, ECU remap. This should breach 300 BHP and 300lbft very easily - bit of tweaking of those boost targets up and down to suit.

To go up to 350 BHP: FMIC, induction kit and inlet pipe, uppipe, 550cc injectors and a fair bit more boost.

And if you had half a brain you would stop before 350 BHP IMHO. I lost my brain a while ago hence all this talk about rebuilds.

[Edited by john banks - 1/16/2003 11:15:41 AM]
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2003 | 03:20 PM
  #19  
Adam M's Avatar
Adam M
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 7,957
Likes: 0
Post

iirc, hyperex' car was a 2.5 open deck and was running 490bhp at low boot.
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2003 | 03:21 PM
  #20  
Adam M's Avatar
Adam M
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 7,957
Likes: 0
Post

that would be boost!
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2003 | 06:34 PM
  #21  
Pavlo's Avatar
Pavlo
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 6,316
Likes: 2
From: home
Post

Trout's and Steve McCulloch's cars both had open deck blocks, with more power (except at WL3!)

Micheal White's legacy is open deck, as is harvey's

Reply
Old Jan 15, 2003 | 06:49 PM
  #22  
Bob Rawle's Avatar
Bob Rawle
Sponsor
 
Joined: Mar 1999
Posts: 3,938
Likes: 1
From: Swindon
Post

"Id say that it would be hard to claim reliability from that??? "

Was that aimed at me Stevieturbo? If not please ignore this post.

One or two others here can testify to how I drive my car (and their's).

Oil consumption has a great deal to do with piston design in my view and its not about clearances or skirt shape.
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2003 | 08:39 PM
  #23  
steve McCulloch's Avatar
steve McCulloch
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 1999
Posts: 2,271
Likes: 0
Post

Yes Bob - people acuse me of driving fast........ let me introduce you to Mr Loonattttttiicccccc.

Or was it that I just was'nt used to being in a catapult.. i.e. the passenger seat of a car... I'm not usually scared

And its not the first time either..... Bob must get about 50 miles to the tank!

Drive sensibly and at low boost, etc... we talking about the same Mr Rawle?
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2003 | 09:17 PM
  #24  
CraigH's Avatar
CraigH
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,675
Likes: 0
Post

Was running 3 thou clearance on mine and didn't get through 4 litres in 3k miles.......

FWIW most of the power figures are pretty meaningless as they haven't all been done in the same conditions.

Seeing Harveys spec for instance, I'd be very confident to have got over 420hp at Well Lane.

Doubt it'd be the same elsewhere tho......

Still - right components, good build and map and I can't see reliability being a "real" issue.

Would be interesting to see one of these spec engines at 30k though.......
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2003 | 10:12 PM
  #25  
Bob Rawle's Avatar
Bob Rawle
Sponsor
 
Joined: Mar 1999
Posts: 3,938
Likes: 1
From: Swindon
Post

Its not a clearance issue, I have checked around and most Cossie powered engine's use some oil, not just Subaru either. The oil control ring design needs some attention imho. Since installing the Omegas I have covered the 2500 miles or so without using a drop so I'm well pleased with that. bear in mind that they were designed to be used in an engine that would get an oil change every 100-200 miles or so.
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2003 | 11:11 PM
  #26  
Andy.F's Avatar
Andy.F
Subaru Tuning Specialist
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,654
Likes: 1
From: 7.74 @179 mph 1/4 mile - road legal
Question

Would this be an appropriate place to mention 'piston ring end gap'

I have seen so many different recommendations for this setting.

Ranging from 0.008" to 0.020" !!

comments ?
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2003 | 11:14 PM
  #27  
john banks's Avatar
john banks
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 1
From: 32 cylinders and many cats
Question

Any experience with Lateral Performance 2 litre pistons and oil usage?
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2003 | 11:50 PM
  #28  
Trout...'s Avatar
Trout...
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,835
Likes: 0
Post

Running around 55,000 miles - of which 30,000 have been running 350-360bhp - on road, track and dragstrip.

Car is a daily driver - and even tho it has been mostly tuned by me has been absolutely fine. There is evidence of some wear - there can be the faintest blue haze in the exhaust when run hard and hot - but oil usage is minimal.

Oh - and it is an open deck block built by Mr Fuji Heavy Industries.

Recently has been running 1.7 bar held (not all the time of course) and still has been fine - seems quite strong at that boost level

So who needs a new engine

Trout

PS According to my BMW manual - a litre of oil every 1000miles is within tolerance
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2003 | 10:02 AM
  #29  
fivepint's Avatar
fivepint
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 869
Likes: 0
From: The Emerald Isle
Post

@JB, AFAIR you are an Autospeed subcriber? I recall an article where they rebulit there own legacy RS ej20 before, with some tips... you may have already read it

http://www.autospeed.com/members/article0158.pdf

just in case...

Cheers
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2003 | 10:36 AM
  #30  
David_Wallis's Avatar
David_Wallis
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 15,239
Likes: 1
From: Leeds - It was 562.4bhp@28psi on Optimax, How much closer to 600 with race fuel and a bigger turbo?
Post

i'm

how can piston design affect how much oil is being used..

Surely if the clearances are greater then theres more chance of oil being blown in to the combustion chamber and being burnt?

Surely the ring end gap would cause the same problem?

It just seems confusing to me as surely its all down to tollerances somewhere, be it piston clearance or rings..??

Im confused..

I have been looking at various pistons for my new engine.. so am very interested in this..
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:42 PM.